Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical advances in breast cancer contribute to improving the postoperative quality of life.

AIM: The study aimed to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of breast-conserving surgery.

METHODS: The study included the treatment outcomes reported for 194 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who had been admitted to the Samara Regional Clinical Cancer Hospital between 2011 and 2020. Group 1 (n = 96) included patients who had undergone conventional breast-conserving surgeries. For group 2 (n = 98), a modified approach, described as “Choosing the extent of surgery for patients diagnosed with breast cancer,” was used. This technique involved the placement of the lateral adipocutaneous flap in the axillary region, with the free edge positioned as close to the nervus thoracicus longus as possible. The analysis focused on operative time and intraoperative blood loss. The disease-free and overall survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meyer method. The patients were also asked to complete the Breast-Q questionnaire prior to surgery and six months after the treatment. The statistical analysis was performed using the parametric (Student’s t test) and non-parametric (Mann–Whitney test, chi-squared test [χ2], and Fisher’s exact test) methods. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: The short-term surgical outcomes were not significantly different between the groups. The mean operative time was 76.3 ± 23.3 minutes in group 1 and 65.5 ± 18.3 minutes in group 2 (p < 0.001), with the intraoperative blood loss recorded at 53.1 ± 26.2 mL and 49.0 ± 14.3 mL, respectively (p = 0.18). Postoperatively, persistent non-infected seroma (>14 days) was identified in 19 patients from group 1 and 7 patients from group 2 (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION: The proposed method provides a significant reduction in the incidence of complications, with long-term outcomes comparable to those observed in the conventional treatment group.

About the authors

Andrey E. Orlov

Samara regional clinical Oncology dispensary; Samara State Medical University

Email: OrlovAE@samaraonko.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6145-3343
SPIN-code: 8902-5712
Scopus Author ID: 37063437400

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Head, Depart. of Public Health and Health Organization of the IPO, Chief Physician

Russian Federation, Samara; Samara

Oleg I. Kaganov

Samara regional clinical Oncology dispensary; Samara State Medical University

Email: okaganov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1765-6965
SPIN-code: 2705-4187

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head, Depart. of Oncology, Deputy Chief Physician

Russian Federation, Samara; Samara

Maksim V. Tkachev

Samara regional clinical Oncology dispensary; Samara State Medical University

Email: m9277477577@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4183-0647
SPIN-code: 9681-0358

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Lecturer, Depart. of Oncology, Oncologist

Russian Federation, Samara; Samara

Artyom V. Bukin

Samara State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: aarbukin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-8083-2689
Russian Federation, Samara

References

  1. Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, et al. 5th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12)1623–1649. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010 EDN: TAULMW
  2. Derouane F, van Marcke C, Berlière M, et al. Predictive biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: Current and future perspectives for Precision Medicine. Cancers. 2022;14(16):3876. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163876 EDN: JGWWHE
  3. Burstein HJ, Regan MM, Winer EP, et al. Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen international consensus guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021. Annals of oncology. 2021;32(10):1216–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023 EDN: YNWRTD
  4. Stankowski-Drengler TJ, Livingston-Rosanoff D, Schumacher JR, et al. Breast cancer outcomes of neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy by receptor type: A scoping review. J Surg Res. 2020;(254):83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.04.011 EDN: JPAQRP
  5. Agostinetto E, Gligorov J, Piccart M. Systemic therapy for early-stage breast cancer: Learning from the past to build the future. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19(12):763–774. doi: 10.1038/s41571-022-00687-1 EDN: ANNMYM
  6. Volchenko AA, Pak DD, Usov FN. Repair plastic surgery in patients with breast cancer. Tumors of female reproductive system. 2011;3:29–32. EDN: PUJIIT
  7. Certificate of state registration of the database No. 2017621170 Russian Federation. Tkachev MV. Selection of the volume of surgical treatment for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. No. 2017620899. declared 14.08.2017. published 09.10.2017. (In Russ.) EDN: JQYMIV
  8. Dines LM, Stellander AKL, Schmidt VJ, Rose M. Oncoplastic breast surgery for patients with breast cancer. Ugeskr Laeger. 2023;185(34):V11220669. Available from: https://ugeskriftet.dk/videnskab/onkoplastisk-brystkirurgi-til-patienter-med-brystkraeft
  9. Thiessen FEF, Tjalma WAA, Tondu T. Breast reconstruction after breast conservation therapy for breast cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.04
  10. Timerbulatov VM, Timerbulatov ShV, Timerbulatov MV. Classification of surgical complications. Pirogov Russian journal of surgery. 2018;9:61–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.049.12 EDN: VKFVAF
  11. A Scoping Review of the Application of BREAST-Q in Surgical Research. JPRAS Open. 2023;37:9–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.04.005 EDN: AVAKAW

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2025 Eco-Vector