Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for abdominal delivery at the regional perinatal center

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. To conduct a comparative pharmacoepidemiological study and assess the rational use of antibiotics in wo­men undergoing caesarean section.

Methods. A retrospective analysis of 1,025 birth histories of women after planned and emergency cesarean section was carried out with a detailed assessment of the use of antibiotics in 2007–2009 (523) and 2016–2017 (502) — with an interval of 10 years for which new clinical guidelines, principles of rational pharmacotherapy and evidence-based medicine were introduced. The time of administration of the first dose, duration of administration, consumption of antibiotics were assessed. The significance of differences in relative indicators was assessed according to Pearson (χ2).

Results. Antibiotics were prescribed to women with planned and emergency caesarean section in 100% of cases in the first period of the study (2007–2009) and prescribed in 98% of women with planned caesarean section and 96% with emergency caesarean section in the second period (2016–2017). In the first period, the first dose of antibiotic was administered: in 110 (44%) cases during surgery and 139 (56%) cases after surgery in planned caesarean section; in 139 (51%) cases during surgery and 135 (49%) cases after surgery in emergency caesarean section. In the second period, antibiotics were administered 30–60 minutes before the operation in 263 (96%) cases in the planned caesarean section and 218 (95%) cases in the emergency; postoperative antibiotics were administered in 7 (2%) women in the planned caesarean section and 2 (1%) women in the emergency (p <0.05). Greater than 5–6 days of antibiotics were used: in 166 (67%) women in the planned operation and 166 (61%) in the emergency for the first period; in 43 (16%) women with the planned operation, and 38 (17%, p <0.05) women with an emergency for the second period. In the first period, 13 antibiotics from 8 pharmacotherapeutic groups were used and in the second period, 7 out of 5 were used.

Conclusion. From 2007 to 2017, the use of antibiotics has become to comply with the implemented clinical guidelines for abdominal delivery: the duration of antibiotic use has decreased, the time of administration of the first dose and the range of antibiotics used changed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ch B Tashtanbekova

Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Author for correspondence.
Email: cholpon.bolotbekovna@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

A A Evstratov

Republican Clinical Hospital

Email: cholpon.bolotbekovna@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

E A Chuenkova

Republican Clinical Hospital

Email: cholpon.bolotbekovna@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia

L E Ziganshina

Russian Medical Academy for Continuing Professional Education; Kazan State Medical University

Email: cholpon.bolotbekovna@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Kazan, Russia; Kazan, Russia

References

  1. Smaill F.M., Gyte G.M. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010; (1): CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub2.
  2. Mackeen A.D., Packard R.E., Ota E., Berghella V., Baxter J.K. Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; (12): CD009516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2.
  3. Westen E.H., Kolk P.R., van Velzen C.L., Unkels R., Mmuni N.S., Hamisi A.D., Nakua R.E., Vlek A.L., van Beekhuizen H.J. Single-dose compared with multiple day antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section in low-resource settings, a randomized controlled, noninferiority trial. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2015b; 94 (1): 43–49. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12517.
  4. Lamont R.F., Joergensen J.S. Prophylactic antibio­tics for caesarean section administered preoperatively rather than post cord clamping significantly reduces the rate of endometritis. Evid. Based Med. 2014; 19 (1): 17. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101429.
  5. Smaill F.M., Grivell R.M. Antibiotic prophyla­xis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; (10): CD007482. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007482.pub3.
  6. Bollig C., Nothacker M., Lehane C., Motschall E., Lang B., Meerpohl J.J., Schmucker C.M. Prophylactic antibiotics before cord clamping in cesarean delivery: a syste­matic review. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2018; 97 (5): 521–535. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13276.
  7. Gouvêa M., Novaes C. de O., Pereira D.M., Iglesias A.C. Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review. Braz. J. Infect. Dis. 2015; 19 (5): 517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2015.06.004.
  8. WHO. Antibiotic resistance is a serious threat to public health. https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/amr-report/ru/ (access date: 15.02.2021). (In Russ.)
  9. Tchilova R.Ya., Istchenko A.I., Rafalskiy V.V., Antonovitch N.I., Belkina E.I., Gaisarova A.R., Maneeva E.S., Nedorozenyuk I.V., Otcheretnaya E.V., Panova I.S., Rozhaev M.V., Suplotova O.V., Toropova I.A., Shevchenko N.P. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in Cesarean section in Russian hospitals. Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2006; 8 (1): 48–53. (In Russ.)
  10. Tashtanbekova Ch.B., Chu­yenkova Ye.A., Yevstratov A.A. Comparative analysis of the prescription of antimicrobial drugs for caesarean section in the interval of 10 years. Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2018; 20 (S1): 43. (In Russ.)
  11. Ziganshina L.E., Magsumova D.R., Kuchayeva A.V., Pikuza O.I., Gerasimov V.B., Yavorsky A.N. ATC/DDD; Classification system in pharmacoepidemiological studies. Kachestvennaya klinicheskaya praktika. 2004; (1): 28–33. (In Russ.)
  12. The Order of Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation No. 583n, issued at 6 November 2012. “On approval of the standard of specialized medical care for delivery by caesarean section”. (In Russ.)
  13. Serov V.N., Adamyan L.V., Filippov O.S., Artymuk N.V., Belokrinitskaya T.E., Kan N.E., Shmakov R.G., Baev O.R., Tyutyunnik V.L., Pyregov A.V., Filippovich G.V., Strizhakov A.N., Bashmakova N.V., Malgina G.B., Erofeev E.N., Tskhai V.B., Salov I.A., Makarov O.V., Tetruashvili N.K., Klimenchenko N.I., Drobinskaya A.N. Russian сlinical recommendations. Caesarean section. Indications, pain relief methods, surgical technique, antibio­ticpropylaxis, postoperative period management. approved Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation May 6, 2014 (15-4/10/2/-3190). М. 2014. https://mz.mosreg.ru/upload/iblock/c23/kesarevo-sechenie.pdf (access date: 15.02.2021). (In Russ.)
  14. Aleksandrova E.G., Abakumova T.R., Evstigneev S.V., Titarenko A.F., Khaziakhmetova V.N., Ziganshina L.E. Multidisciplinary health care monitoring and training program: impact on antibiotic use. Kazan Medical Journal. 2020; 101 (3): 403–411. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/KMJ2020-403.
  15. WHO. ATC/DDD Index 2021. https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (access date: 15.02.2021).
  16. Tashtanbekova Ch.B., Evstratov A.A., Chuenkova E.A., Ziganshina L.E. Antibiotic use for caesarean section prophylaxis at a specialized regional perinatal centre. International Society to Improve the Use of Medicines. People improving the use of medicines: What we know & don’t know. 2020; 79.
  17. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011). Caesarean section. NICE Clinical Guideline. London: The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG132/Guidance/pdf (access date: 10.02.2021).
  18. Gholitabar M., Ullman R., James D., Griffiths M. Caesarean section: Summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2011; 343: 7108. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7108.
  19. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin No. 199: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 132 (3): e103–e119. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002833.
  20. Mackeen A.D., Packard R.E., Ota E., Speer L. Antibiotic regimens for postpartum endometritis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015; 2: CD001067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001067.pub3.
  21. Berríos-Torres S.I., Umscheid C.A., Bratzler D.W., Leas B., Stone E.C., Kelz R.R., Reinke C.E., Morgan S., Solomkin J.S., Mazuski J.E., Dellinger E.P., Itani K.M.F., Berbari E.F., Segreti J., Parvizi J., Blanchard J., Allen G., Kluytmans J.A.J.W., Donlan R., Schecter W.P.; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152 (8): 784–791. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904.
  22. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. A national clinical guideline. Edinburgh: SIGN. 2008; 1–71.
  23. Van Schalkwyk J., Van Eyk N.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Infectious Diseases Committee. Antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetric procedures. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2010; 32 (9): 878–892. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34662-X.
  24. Gyte G.M.L., Dou L., Vazquez J.C. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014; 11: CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub2.
  25. Sommerstein R., Marschall J., Atkinson A., Surbek D., Dominguez-Bello M.G., Troillet N., Widmer A.F.; Swissnoso. Antimicrobial prophylaxis administration after umbilical cord clamping in cesarean section and the risk of surgical site infection: a cohort study with 55,901 patients. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2020; 9: 201. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00860-0.
  26. Jyothi M.S., Kalra J.K., Arora A., Patil A., Suri V., Jain V., Shafiq N., Saini S.S., Gautam V. Randomized controlled trial of cefazolin monotherapy versus cefazolin plus azithromycin single dose prophylaxis for cesarean deliveries: A developing country's perspective. J. Family Med. Prim. Care. 2019; 8: 3015–3021. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_593_19.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

© 2021 Tashtanbekova C.B., Evstratov A.A., Chuenkova E.A., Ziganshina L.E.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies