Effect of p38 MAPK inhibition on the severity of intestinal dysfunction in suppurative peritonitis under antibacterial therapy

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying new treatment strategies aimed at restoring intestinal wall integrity and preventing the development of abdominal sepsis remains a pressing issue in modern medicine.

AIM: This study aimed to examine the course of experimental peritonitis and the resulting intestinal dysfunction during etiotropic antibacterial therapy combined with pathogenetic treatment using a p38 MAPK inhibitor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Male Wistar rats were divided into control groups 1 and 2 and experimental groups 1, 2, and 3. All animals underwent induction of postoperative diffuse peritonitis via intraperitoneal injection of a suspension containing 109 microbial bodies/mL of Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis. One day after peritonitis modeling, rats in the control groups received 3 mL of saline intraperitoneally, while rats in the experimental groups received 3 mL of an aqueous solution of the p38 MAPK inhibitor (a conjugate of 4-[4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-1H-imidazole-5-pyridine] with poly-1-vinylimidazole). All animals received antibacterial therapy (cefoperazone + sulbactam, 47 mg/day intramuscularly) starting on day 1 post-modeling. In control group 1 and experimental group 1, the duration of antibiotic therapy was 5 days; in control group 2 and experimental groups 2 and 3, it was 10 days. Animals were euthanized on days 3, 7, 14, and 28. Peritoneal fluid underwent microbiological analysis, and intestinal wall samples were examined histologically. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10 for Windows. The significance of differences between the compared samples (p values) was assessed using the Wilcoxon (W) test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

RESULTS: Administration of the p38 MAPK inhibitor alongside 5-day antibiotic therapy significantly reduced the severity of intestinal dysfunction on days 3 (pu = 0.005), 7 (pu = 0.005), and 14 (pu = 0.003), compared with control group 1. With 10-day antibiotic therapy, both early (group 2) and delayed (group 3) administration of the inhibitor resulted in reduced intestinal wall damage on days 14 (pu = 0.001) and 28 (pu = 0.003), compared with control group 2.

CONCLUSION: The p38 MAPK inhibitor attenuated the severity of destructive changes in the intestinal wall when administered alongside antibacterial therapy.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elena E. Chepurnykh

Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology

Author for correspondence.
Email: chepurnikh.ee@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3197-4276
SPIN-code: 6020-9356

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Academic Secretary, Assist. Prof., Depart. of Faculty Surgery

Russian Federation, 1 Bortsov Revolyutsii st,Irkutsk, 664003

Irina A. Shurygina

Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology

Email: shurygina@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3980-050X
SPIN-code: 6745-5426

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof. of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Director for Science, Head of Lab., lab. of Cellular Technologies and Regeneration Medicine

Russian Federation, 1 Bortsov Revolyutsii st,Irkutsk, 664003

Tatyana V. Fadeeva

Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology

Email: fadeeva05@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4681-905X
SPIN-code: 3407-0335

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Lab. of Cell Technologies and Regenerative Medicine

Russian Federation, 1 Bortsov Revolyutsii st,Irkutsk, 664003

Natalya N. Dremina

Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology

Email: drema76@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2540-4525
SPIN-code: 8038-3583

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Senior Researcher, Lab. of Cell Technologies and Regenerative Medicine

Russian Federation, 1 Bortsov Revolyutsii st,Irkutsk, 664003

Mikhail G. Shurygin

Irkutsk Scientific Centre of Surgery and Traumatology

Email: shurygin@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5921-0318
SPIN-code: 6638-5630

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Scientific Laboratory Depart.

Russian Federation, 1 Bortsov Revolyutsii st,Irkutsk, 664003

References

  1. Pathak AA, Agrawal V, Sharma N, et al. Prediction of mortality in secondary peritonitis: A prospective study comparing p-POSSUM, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, and Jabalpur Peritonitis Index. Perioper Med. 2023;12(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00355-7 EDN: YECGPE
  2. Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Catena F, et al. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study). World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0055-0 EDN: WOILLN
  3. Saraev AR, Nazarov ShK. Pathogenesis and classification of advanced peritonitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;12:106–110. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20191211067 EDN: VZWNUL
  4. Weledji EP, Ngowe MN. The challenge of intra-abdominal sepsis. Int J Surg. 2013;11(4):290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.02.021
  5. Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, et al; European Surgical Outcomes Study (EuSOS) group for the Trials groups of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the European Society of Anaesthesiology. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7 day cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380(9847):1059–65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9
  6. Aliev SA., Aliev ES. Enteral insufficiency syndrome: Current provisions about the terminology, pathogenesis and treatment (review of literature). Grekov’s Bulletin of Surgery. 2020;179(6):101–106. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-6-101-1062 EDN: LSOOKW
  7. Meng M, Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. New insights into the gut as the driver of critical illness and organ failure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23(2):143–148. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000386
  8. Fan TT, Cheng BL, Fang XM, et al. Application of Chinese medicine in the management of critical conditions: A review on sepsis. Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(6):1315–1330. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500640 EDN: QCZJZC
  9. Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, et al; STOP-IT Trial Investigators. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):1996–2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411162 EDN: XOOUTT
  10. Montravers P, Tubach F, Lescot T, et al; DURAPOP Trial Group. Short-course antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: The DURAPOP randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):300–310. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5088-x EDN: VFOONW
  11. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al; Sepsis Definitions Task Force. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):775–787. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289 EDN: RJMEIO
  12. Castelo-Soccio L, Kim H, Gadina M, et al. Protein kinases: Drug targets for immunological disorders. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023;23(12):787–806. doi: 10.1038/s41577-023-00877-7 EDN: HOYSTW
  13. Heng CKM, Gilad N, Darlyuk-Saadon I, et al. Targeting the p38α pathway in chronic inflammatory diseases: Could activation, not inhibition, be the appropriate therapeutic strategy? Pharmacol Ther. 2022;235:108153. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108153 EDN: ABRTEA
  14. Shurygina IA, Shurygin MG, Zelenin NV, Ayushinova NI. Influence on mitogen-activated protein kinases as a new direction of connective tissue growth regulation. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017;16(4):86–93. doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2017-4-86-93 EDN: YQMYBF
  15. Shurygina I, Trukhan I, Dremina N, Shurygin M. Mitogen-activated protein kinases as a target for regulating the connective tissue growth. In: Advances in Health and Disease. Vol. 67, Chapter 4. Lowell TD, editor. New York; 2023. P. 99–122. EDN: BBZYKT
  16. Zhang HW, Ding JD, Zhang ZS, et al. Critical role of p38 in spinal cord injury by regulating inflammation and apoptosis in a rat model. Spine. 2020;45(7):E355–E363. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003282 EDN: MVOBRI
  17. Chepurnykh EE, Shurygina IA, Fadeeva TV, et al. p38 MAPK inhibitors in the treatment of experimental peritonitis. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2024;12(3):32–39. doi: 10.33029/2308-1198-2024-12-3-32-39 EDN: QORSIN
  18. Patent RUS № 2716482/ 11.03.2020. Byul. № 8. Chepurnykh EE, Shurygina IA, Fadeeva TV, Grigoriev EG. Method for modeling peritonitis. (In Russ.)
  19. Chepurnykh EE, Shurygina IA, Fadeeva TV, Grigoriev EG. Experimental modeling of general purulent peritonitis. Acta biomedica scientifica. 2019;4(3):117–121. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2019-4.3.15 EDN: FXHDPM
  20. Shurygina IA, Adelshin RV, Drozdova PB, et al. Bacteroides fragilis strain ISCST1982, whole genome shotgun sequencing project. [cited 2024 Jun 23] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_QUBP00000000.1
  21. Patent RUS № 2749435/ 10.06.2021. Byul. № 16. Shurygina IA, Shurygin MG, Chepurnykh EE. A method for the treatment of enteral insufficiency in inflammatory and traumatic injuries of the peritoneum. (In Russ.)
  22. Fadeeva TV, Shurygina IA, Dremina NN, et al. Bacterial translocation in experimental peritonitis. Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin. 2019;(4):128–133. doi: 10.52485/19986173_2019_4_128 EDN: YIMYLB
  23. Shurygina IA, Chepurnykh EE, Dremina NN, Shurygin MG. Development of a scale for assessing the expression of enteral insufficiency. Modern problems of science and education. 2021;(5):95. doi: 10.17513/spno.31151 EDN: HMHFVB
  24. Kosinets VA. Enteral insufficiency syndrome: pathogenesis, modern principles of diagnosis and treatment. Novosti Khirurgii. 2008;16(2):130–138. (In Russ.) EDN: PDINUZ
  25. Suslov AV, Mitroshin AN, Solomakha AA, et al. Effect of antibacterial therapy on the barrier function of the intestinal wall. Clinical and Experiment Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2019;7(4(26)):78–83. doi: 10.24411/2308-1198-2019-14010 EDN: MZKSES
  26. Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. The gut as the motor of multiple organ dysfunction in critical illness. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(2):203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2015.11.004
  27. Li H, Limenitakis JP, Fuhrer T, et al. The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8292. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9292
  28. Williamson AJ, Alverdy JC. Influence of the microbiome on anastomotic leak. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2021;34(6):439–446. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735276 EDN: TQDJFQ

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Dynamics of the severity of enteral insufficiency during morphological examination in control group 1 and the experimental group 1 against the background of 5-days antibacterial therapy. КГ — control group, OГ — main group.

Download (39KB)
3. Fig. 2. Changes in the severity of enteric insufficiency in rats with modeled peritonitis, based on histological examination in CG-2, EG-2, and EG-3 during 10 days of antibacterial therapy

Download (39KB)
4. Fig. 1. Dynamics of the severity of enteral insufficiency during morphological examination in control group 1 and the experimental group 1 against the background of 5-days antibacterial therapy. КГ — control group, OГ — main group.

Download (30KB)
5. Fig. 2. Dynamics of the severity of enteral insufficiency during morphological examination in control group 2, experimental group 2 and the experimental group 3 against the background of 10-days antibacterial therapy. КГ — control group, OГ — main group. 

Download (32KB)

© 2025 Eco-Vector