Recurrent and residual cholesteatoma rates after different types of sanitation surgery on middle ear

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Aim. To compare the recurrent and residual cholesteatoma rates after four variants of sanitation operations on the middle ear (open and closed techniques, mastoidal cavity obliteration and posterior wall reconstruction using the allogeneic cartilage).

Methods. The study involved 231 patients: 123 men and 108 women aged 15 to 64 years. Patients were divided into four groups depending on the type of surgery. Patients of all groups were examined in the distant period - a minimum within 1 year (range 1-15 years). The surgery results were evaluated using otomicroscopy (OPMI Sensera microscope) by two parameters. The first parameter - the presence or absence of recurrent and residual cholesteatoma in postoperative period. The second parameter - «bad», adverse retraction pockets occurrence in postoperative period. We referred to them cases when the pocket was in medial section of the external auditory canal (i.e. closer to neotympanic membrane or tympanic membrane remnants), had a narrow or convoluted entrance (i.e. epidermal masses evacuation from pocket was difficult) and was filled with epidermal, sulfur or fungal masses.

Results. Open type of sanitation operation showed the lowest likelihood of cholesteatoma recurrence - 1.27%. Trepanation cavity obliteration method using fascial-muscle flap on the lower pedicle showed the highest rate of cholesteatoma recurrence - 33.33%.

Conclusion. The minimum probability of recurrent and residual cholesteatoma occurrence is characteristic for open type of sanitation operation; method of trepanation cavity obliteration using fascial-muscle flap is not recommended for use because of the high rate of adverse outcomes.

About the authors

S Yu Ognetov

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: ognetovlor@rambler.ru

A P Kravchuk

Izhevsk State Medical Academy

Email: ognetovlor@rambler.ru

References

  1. Борисенко О.Н., Сушко Ю.А., Полищук Г.С. и др. О рецидивной и резидуальной холестеатоме после различных вариантов тимпанопластики у больных хроническим гнойным средним отитом. Ж. ушных, носовых и горловых болезней. 2000; (6): 9-13.
  2. Карнеева О.В., Поляков Д.П., Намазова-Баранова Л.С. и др. Способ динамического наблюдения ретракционного кармана барабанной перепонки для раннего выявления ретракционной холестеатомы у детей. Патент №2464934RU, МПК A61B 8/00 (2006.01). Бюлл. №30 от 27.10.2012.
  3. Косяков С.Я., Лазебный В.В., Коршок В.В., Пчеленок Е.В. МРТ в предоперационном обследовании и послеоперационном контроле при хроническом среднем отите с холестеатомой. Вестн. оториноларингол. 2012; (5): 14-19.
  4. De Foer B., Vercruysse J.-Ph., Bernaerts A. et al. Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with nonecho-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otol. Neurol. 2008; 29: 513-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31816c7c3b
  5. Kerckhoffs K.G.P., Kommer M.B.J., van Strien T.H.L. et al. The disease recurrence rate after the canal wall up (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) technique in adults. Laryngoscope. 2015; 125 (4): 1-8.
  6. Sade J. Treatment of cholesteatoma and retraction pockets. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 1993; 250 (4): 193-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00171523
  7. Sade J. Treatment of retraction pockets and cholesteatoma. J. Laryngol. Otolog. 1982; 96: 685-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100093002
  8. Smyth G.D.L. Surgical treatment of cholesteatoma: the role of staging in closed operations. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1988; 97 (7): 667-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348948809700616

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2016 Ognetov S.Y., Kravchuk A.P.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies