Aspiration drainage in the prevention of postoperative septic complications in rectum sphincter-sparing abdominoperitoneal resection
- Authors: Akhmetzyanov FS.1,2, Shaykhutdinov NT3, Valiev NA3, Shemeunova ZN3, Egorov VI1
-
Affiliations:
- Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia
- Volga Region Branch of Russian Cancer Research Center named after N.N. Blokhin, Kazan, Russia
- Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan, Russia
- Issue: Vol 96, No 6 (2015)
- Pages: 935-939
- Section: Theoretical and clinical medicine
- URL: https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/1616
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ1616
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Aim. Explore the effectiveness of the double-barreled drainage tube «tube in tube», mounted by the developed technique after rectum sphincter-sparing abdominoperitoneal resection due to cancer.
Methods. The data of 52 patients with rectal tumors who underwent rectum sphincter-sparing abdominoperitoneal resection in two surgical wards over the past 4 years were analyzed. At the surgery, the colon was brought down together with anal channel mucosa excision and bringing down the colon mucosa to the anal channel. Rectum sphincter-sparing abdominoperitoneal resection was finished in all patients by placing a double-barreled drainage tube of the original construction to the retroperitoneal part of the cavity of the true pelvis by an original method via the anterior abdominal wall incision. No one-step intestinal stoma was exteriorized in any of the patients.
Results. The average duration of postoperative hospital stay was 17 days; in patients who underwent non-hybrid operation (50 of 52 patients) - 15.3 bed-days. Postoperative complications occurred in a total of 11 (21.1%) patients, and the rate of septic complications was 1.9%, which is lower compared to published data. It is worth noticing that the use of our original method of pelvic cavity draining totally excludes peritoneal fistula formation and facilitates post-operative care.
Conclusion. The proposed method of pelvic cavity draining at rectum sphincter-sparing abdominoperitoneal resections might be effective, as is associated with lower chance of purulent and septic complications. It excludes the possibility of perineal fistula formation, facilitates the post-operative period management.
About the authors
F Sh Akhmetzyanov
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia; Volga Region Branch of Russian Cancer Research Center named after N.N. Blokhin, Kazan, Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: Akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
N T Shaykhutdinov
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan, Russia
Email: Akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
N A Valiev
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan, Russia
Email: Akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
Z N Shemeunova
Tatarstan Regional Clinical Cancer Center, Kazan, Russia
Email: Akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
V I Egorov
Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia
Email: Akhmetzyanov@mail.ru
References
- Александров В.Б. Рак прямой кишки. М.: Вузовская книга. 2001; 208 с.
- Ахметзянов Ф.Ш., Сунгатуллин А.Г., Мельников Е.А. Способ брюшно-анальной резекции прямой кишки. Патент на изобретение №99100404. Бюлл. №22 от 10.08.2001. .
- Ахметзянов Ф.Ш., Шайхутдинов Н.Т., Ахметзянова Ф.Ф. Дренаж послеоперационный «труба в трубе». Патент на изобретение №100726. Бюлл. №36 от 27.12.2010.
- Ахметзянов Ф.Ш., Шайхутдинов Н.Т., Ахметзянова Ф.Ф. Способ послеоперационного дренирования малого таза. Патент на изобретение №2438603. Бюлл. №1 от 10.05.2012.
- Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2012 году. М.: ФГБУ «МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена» Минздрава России. 2013; 232 с.
- Одарюк Т.С., Воробьёв Г.И., Шелыгин Ю.А. Хирургия рака прямой кишки. М.: ООО «Дедалус». 2005; 255 с.
- Фёдоров В.Д., Воробьёв Г.И., Ривкин В.Л. Оперативная колопроктология: руководство для врачей. М.: ГНЦ проктологии. 1994; 432 с.
- Ханевич М.Д., Шашолин М.А., Зязин А.А. Колоректальный рак: подготовка толстой кишки к операции. М.: МедЭкспертПресс; Петрозаводск: ИнтелТек. 2003; 136 с.
- Center M., Siegel R., Jemal A. Global Cancer Facts & Figures 2010. Amer. Cancer Society. 2011; 58 p.
- Yang L., Huang X.E., Zhou J.N. Risk assessment on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: An analysis of 753 patients. Asian Pacif. J. Cancer Prevent. 2013; 14: 4447-4453. http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4447
- Warschkow R., Steffen T., Thierbach J., Bruckner T. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection and reconstruction with colorectostomy. A retrospective study with bootstrap analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010; 18: 2331-2340.
- Weaver M., Burdon D.V., Youngs D.J. Oral neomycin and erythromycin compared with single-dose systemic metronidazole and ceftriaxone prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery. Am. J. Surg. 1986; 151: 437-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(86)90097-8
