Anatomical Features of the Caval Porta of the Liver: A Cohort Study



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study of in vivo topographic and anatomical features of the hepatic caval porta is a key factor in improving existing surgical approaches and developing new ones for managing liver trauma.

AIM: This study aimed to identify in vivo anatomical and topographic characteristics of the hepatic caval porta among individuals of varying sexes, ages, and body types.

METHODS: The study included 128 patients (56 men and 72 women), aged 19–90 years, who represented three body types. Using contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography of the abdominal organs, the in vivo topography of the hepatic caval porta was assessed, including its length, width, perimeter, and area in the coronal projection, and the length of extrahepatic hepatic vein segments. As the data were not normally distributed, quantitative parameters (e.g., age and anatomical, topographic, and geometric features of the hepatic veins) were compared using the Mann–Whitney, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, and median χ2 tests. Qualitative variables (e.g., sex and porta shape) were evaluated using nonparametric χ2 tests, including Pearson’s and Fisher’s criteria.

RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the in vivo topographic and anatomical structure of the hepatic caval porta among the examined patients. Comparison of age groups showed that mean values in the 18–44-year group were higher for the following parameters: hepatic caval porta width (27.42 mm), length (13.84 mm), and area (515.50 mm2). In the 60–75-year group, higher values were noted for the hepatic caval porta perimeter (107.89 mm) and distance to the confluence of the hepatic veins into the inferior vena cava (2.79 mm). Using the Mann–Whitney test, significant differences were observed between the 18–44 and 60–75 age groups (p ≤ 0.05; p = 0.0460). A similar trend was noted between the 18–44 and 45–59 age groups (p = 0.0922).

CONCLUSION: Differences in the dimensions of the hepatic caval porta were determined across all age groups, with significant differences observed only between the youngest and oldest cohorts. The most pronounced differences were found in width, length, and area of the porta, as well as perimeter and distance to hepatic vein confluence. These parameters exhibited variable trends when individual indices were compared.

About the authors

Evgenii M. Trunin

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Elizabethan Hospital

Email: Evgeniy.Trunin@szgmu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2452-0321
SPIN-code: 5903-0288
Scopus Author ID: 6507770138

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head, Depart. of Operative and Clinical Surgery with Topographic Anatomy named after S.A. Simbirtsev; surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Anton V. Koshcheev

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Elizabethan Hospital

Email: kosheev70@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1803-5298
SPIN-code: 3262-3307
Scopus Author ID: 57222985357

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor, Depart. of Operative and Clinical Surgery with Topographic Anatomy named after S.A. Simbirtsev; surgeon

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint Petersburg

Elena S. Kozyuta

Vsevolozhsk Clinical Interdistrict Hospital

Author for correspondence.
Email: kozyutal12@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-4096-8444

Surgeon

Russian Federation, Vsevolozhsk

Vladislav V. Tatarkin

North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: vlad1k2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9599-3935
SPIN-code: 5008-4677
Scopus Author ID: 57897143900

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor, Depart. of Operative and Clinical Surgery with Topographic Anatomy named after S.A. Simbirtsev

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Yuri L. Vasil’ev

The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University; MIREA — Russian Technological University

Email: y_vasiliev@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3541-6068
SPIN-code: 6710-2080
Scopus Author ID: 57194755259

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Depart. of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy of the N.V. Sklifosovsky; senior research associate, Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Lab MIREA

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Henry L, Fischer N. Delayed haemorrhage and pseudoaneurysms following liver trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):2823–2830. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01889-z EDN: PKYRAP
  2. Borisov AE. Guidelines for surgery of the liver and biliary tract. Saint Petersburg: Skifiya; 2003. 448 p. (In Russ.) Available from: https://reallib.org/reader?file=585635&pg=1
  3. Gaibov AD, Sultanov DD, Kalmykov EL, et al. Reconstruction of hollow veins. Pirogov Russian journal of surgery. 2022;(10):35–43. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202210135 EDN: KEIIHU
  4. Dzidzava II. Topographic and anatomical conditions of reconstruction of the trunk and roots of the portal vein during gastropancreatoduodneal resection. Bulletin of the russian military medical academy. 2021;73(1):33–40. doi: 10.17816/brmma60216 EDN: TRJNKL
  5. Vishnevskiy VA, Efanov MG, Shchegolev AI, et al. Topographic and anatomical substantiation of atraumatic intrahepatic secretion of glissone legs in the liver gate. Annals of HPB surgery. 2008;13(4):58–66. EDN: NXRYKR
  6. Gayvoronskiy IV. Normal human anatomy. Saint Petersburg: SpetsLit; 2020. 567 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-299-00755-8 EDN: ULBAEX
  7. Simonetto D, Liu M, Kamath P. Portal Hypertension and Related Complications: Diagnosis and Management. Mayo Clinic proceeding. 2019;4(94):714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.12.020
  8. Claviena PA, Saff M, Fong Y. Atlas of Upper Gastrointestinal, Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Surgery. Moscow: Izd-vo Panfilova; 2009. 452 p. (In Russ.) ISBN: 978-5-9963-0233-8
  9. Lorente S, Hautefeuille M, Sanchez-Cedillo A. The liver, a functionalized vascular structure. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73208-8 EDN: ZKJTWX
  10. Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Ordonez C, et al; WSES expert panel. Liver trauma: WSES 2020 guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2020;15(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00302-7 EDN: SWWXNZ
  11. Keshav N, Ohliger MA. Imaging Vascular Disorders of the Liver. Radiol Clin North America. 2022;60(5):857–871. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2022.05.008 EDN: PFWVDO
  12. Massarollo PCB, Coelho FF, Brescia MDG, et al. Long-term outcome of a modified piggyback liver transplantation technique using the recipient's right and middle hepatic veins. Transplant Proc. 2020;52(5):1308–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.039 EDN: VXOOGC
  13. Zhang Q, Li A, Chen S, et al. Multiscale reconstruction of various vessels in the intact murine liver lobe. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):260. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03221-2 EDN: KJEUJC
  14. Patarashvili L, Gvidiani S, Azmaipharashvili E, et al. Portacaval fibrous connections - the lesser-known structure of intrahepatic connective-tissue framework: A unified view of liver extracellular matrix. World J Hepatol. 2021;13(11):1484–1493. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1484 EDN: QXVHML

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2025 Eco-Vector