Comprehensive Investigation of Long-Term Outcomes of Transpapillary Interventions in Patients With Choledocholithiasis



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of the long-term outcomes of endoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis is understudied, resulting in dissatisfaction in both patients and surgeons.

AIM: To study the diagnostic capabilities of various integrated methods for the long-term assessment of the major duodenal papilla and bile duct function after different transpapillary interventions for choledocholithiasis.

METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with choledocholithiasis aged 19 to 83 years (mean age 61.3 ± 5.7 years) underwent hepatobiliary scintigraphy, endosonography, and duodenoscopy 12 to 36 months after transpapillary interventions. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 36) received sphincter-preserving treatment, and group 2 (n = 31) received non–sphincter-preserving treatment. We assessed the diameter of the choledochus, wall thickness, and presence of gallstones in the common bile duct. We used nonparametric Mann–Whitney tests to conduct a statistical analysis of the between-group differences. We analyzed the parameter relationships using nonparametric correlation analysis and the calculation of gamma rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS: Long-term duodenoscopy after transpapillary interventions allows us to estimate the preservation coefficient of the intramural choledochus, that is, the degree of sphincter of Oddi dissection of less than 30% and greater than 70%. When this parameter exhibited a low value, the following conditions were detected significantly more often by endosonography: increased diameter of choledochus ≥ 7 mm (p = 0.007; the reference value is ≤6 mm), wall thickening of the common bile duct > 1 mm (p < 0.001), aerobilia and transient dilatation of the choledochus with water load (p = 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively), and a gallstone in the common bile duct (p = 0.002). Correlation analysis showed a meaningful (p < 0.05) relationship between radiopharmaceutical agent transit time > 20 minutes and the dysfunction index (γ = 0.750 for dysfunction index > 1; γ = −0.785 for dysfunction index ≤ 1), which indicates the risk of decompensation of barrier function and possible complications with persistently slow transit.

CONCLUSION: The integrated approach using hepatobiliary scintigraphy, endosonography, and duodenoscopy is an unbiased assessment method of the major duodenal papilla and bile duct function after transpapillary interventions for choledocholithiasis.

About the authors

Ilyas M. Sayfutdinov

Interregional Clinical-Diagnostic Center; Kazan State Medical Academy

Author for correspondence.
Email: ISayfutdinov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5768-6096
SPIN-code: 6771-5167
Scopus Author ID: 57192999417

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor, Depart. of Endoscopy, General and Endoscopic Surgery, Head, Depart. of Endoscopy

Russian Federation, Kazan; Kazan

Dmitry M. Krasilnikov

Kazan State Medical University

Email: dmkras131@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4973-4040
SPIN-code: 8395-0990

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head, Depart. of Surgical Diseases

Russian Federation, Kazan

Alexander N. Chugunov

Kazan State Medical Academy

Email: chugunov-an@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-6076-5029
SPIN-code: 4360-8238

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head, Depart. of Endoscopy, General and Endoscopic Surgery

Russian Federation, Kazan

Lev E. Slavin

Interregional Clinical-Diagnostic Center; Kazan State Medical Academy

Email: lev.s@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4121-4545
SPIN-code: 3862-2719

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Depart. of Endoscopy, General and Endoscopic Surgery, Chief Specialist in Surgery

Russian Federation, Kazan; Kazan

Mikhail V. Panasyuk

Kazan Federal University

Email: mp3719@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2884-8815
SPIN-code: 8906-2240

Dr. Sci. (Geography), Professor, Leading Specialist, Depart. of Organization and Support of Scientific Research

Russian Federation, Kazan

References

  1. Kageoka M, Watanabe F, Maruyama Y, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Dig Endosc. 2009;21(3):170–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2009.00880.x
  2. Nzenza TC, Al-Habbal Y, Guerra GR, et al. Recurrent common bile duct stones as a late complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12876-018-0765-3.12
  3. Rolny P., Andrén-Sandberg A, Falk A. Recurrent pancreatitis as a late complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: diagnosis and therapy. Endoscopy. 2003;35(4):356–359. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38137
  4. Schreurs WH, Juttmann JR, Stuifbergen WNHM, et al. Management of common bile duct stones: selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(7):1068–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9104-8
  5. Ugljesić M, Bulajić M, Milosavljević T, Stimec B. Endoscopic manometry of the sphincter of Oddi in sphincterotomized patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 1995;42(4):348–351.
  6. Potashov LV, Polyglottov OV, Shchetinin VN, et al. Immediate results of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis depending on the method of dissection of the large duodenal papilla. The Scientific Notes of the Pavlov University. 2009;16(3):74–75. EDN: UKFSPL
  7. Solodinina EN, Starkov YuG, Shumkin LV. Endosonography in differential diagnosis of common bile duct stenosis. Experimental and clinical gastroenterology. 2015;116(4):22–26. EDN: TXVAVP
  8. Kuznetsov NA, Sokolov AA, Akkuratova AYu, et al. Dynamic hepatobiliscintigraphy with a drug test in the diagnosis of pathology of the large duodenal papilla. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University. 2010;6:31–35. EDN: NMWAXT
  9. Repin MV, Mikryukov VYu, Wagner TE, Pleshkova NM. Diagnosis of Oddi sphincter insufficiency in patients with postcholecystectomy syndrome according to hepatobiliscintigraphy. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2015;6:5–11. doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2015-0-6-107-113 EDN: VBTTSL
  10. Sugiyama M, Suzuki Y, Abe N, et al. Endoscopic retreatment of recurrent choledocholithiasis after sphincterotomy. Gut. 2004;53(12):1856–1859. doi: 10.1136/gut.2004.041020
  11. Geenen JE, Toouli J, Hogan WJ, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: follow up evaluation of effects on the sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology. 1984;87(4):754–758. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(84)90066-0
  12. Patent RUS № 2794916/Declared 12.01.2022. Published 25.04.2023. Byul. №12. Sayfutdinov IM, Valiullina NM. A method for comprehensive diagnostics of sphincter of Oddi insufficiency after endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/RU2794916C1/ru (In Russ.) EDN: EPWHOJ
  13. Patent RUS № 2771260/Declared 25.05.2021. Published 29.04.2022. Byul. №13. Sayfutdinov IM. Method of endoscopic sphincter-preserving atypical papillotomy in choledocholithiasis. Available from: https://yandex.ru/patents/doc/RU2644307C1_20180208 (In Russ.) EDN: WBOLPS
  14. Sayfutdinov IM, Krasilnikov DM, Slavin LE, et al. Long-term results of the improved author's method of sphincter-preserving papillotomy in patients with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic surgery. 2023;29(3):31–37. doi: 10.17116/endoskop20232903131 EDN: QDXEMO

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2025 Eco-Vector