The role of the Kazan surgical school in better understanding of sepsis

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The work aims to give a clinical assessment of the scientific research of representatives of the Kazan surgical school in the 40–60s of the last century on the problem of sepsis and to consider the practical significance of the results obtained in the light of modern concepts about the purulent-septic disease, as well as to study the effectiveness of the methods used to reduce mortality in wound sepsis. The representatives of the Kazan surgical school were among the first physicians in the national medical society to substantiate the key role of the local focus/foci and generalization of infection in the development of sepsis. They first laid the foundations for the prevention of generalization of infection from the primary focus — as the main factor for developing sepsis. Their data on the role of bacteremia in the etiology of sepsis and the prevention of fulminant sepsis are still relevant. These achievements remain priorities for the domestic surgical school and have become part and parcel of the international guidelines 2016 on sepsis (“Sepsis-3”).

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V E Volkov

Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulianov

Author for correspondence.
Email: volkovserguei@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Cheboksary, Russia

S V Volkov

Chuvash State University named after I.N. Ulianov

Email: volkovserguei@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Cheboksary, Russia

References

  1. Volkov V.E., Volkov S.V. Evolution of percieving the problem of sepsis: from the period of Pirogov’s life to nowa­days. Zdravookhraneniye Chuvashii. 2019; (2): 93–100. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25589/GIDUV.2019.28.91.009.
  2. Savel′yev V.S., Gel′fand B.R. Sepsis v nachale XXI veka. Prakticheskoye rukovodstvo. (Sepsis at the dawn of XXI century. A practical guide.) M.: Litterra. 2006; 176 р. (In Russ.)
  3. Savel′yev V.S. Sepsis v khirurgii: sostoyaniye problemy i perspektivy. (Sepsis in surgery: state of the art and prospectives.) In: 80 lektsiy po khirurgii. (80 lectures on surgery.) M.: Litterra. 2008; 696–700. (In Russ.)
  4. Volkov V.E., Volkov S.V. Shok. Sepsis. Poliorgannaya nedostatochnost′. (Shock. Sepsis. Multiple organ failure.) Cheboksary: PBOYUL Naumov L.A. 2009; 348 р. (In Russ.)
  5. Vishnevskiy A.V. Mestnoye obezbolivaniye po metodu polzuchego infil′trata. (Local anaesthesia using the technique of tight tissue infiltration.) M.: Medgiz. 1956; 352 р. (In Russ.)
  6. Sokolov N.V. Khirurgicheskiy sepsis. (Surgical sepsis.) Kazan′: Tatknigoizdat. 1957; 144 р. (In Russ.)
  7. Kalil A., Pinsky M.R. Septic shock. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/168402-overview (access date: 18.01.2021).
  8. Shankar-Hari M., Phillips G., Levy M.L., Seymour C., Vincent X., Deutschman C., Angus D., Rubenfeld G., Singer M. Developing a new definition and assessing new clinical criteria for septic shock: For the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016; 315 (8): 775–787. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2021 Volkov V.E., Volkov S.V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies