Legal Regulation of the Remediation of Accumulated Environmental Damage at Industrial Sites in the USA

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The practice of eliminating accumulated environmental damage in the United States of America is reviewed. The relevance of the stated problems for the Russian Federation and the need for critical analysis of similar foreign experience is stated. The general legal regulation of handling hazardous chemicals in the USA is described, the direct subject of the research is defined as legal and institutional forms of elimination of consequences of releases of hazardous chemicals into the environment in accordance with the CERCLA law. The historical background of the regulatory act is investigated, and the negative influence of political circumstances on its quality is revealed. The main elements f the system of liquidation of accumulated environmental damage created by CERCLA are thoroughly analysed, the features of legal procedures related to preparation and implementation of measures on remediation of contaminated objects are revealed in detail. The problems of financial sustainability of these measures caused by changes in tax regimes are revealed, some peculiarities of prosecuting persons guilty of environmental contamination with hazardous chemicals are revealed. Based on the results of the study, conclusions are formulated about the possibility of adopting some positive features of foreign experience and the need to continue comparative research in the field of elimination of accumulated environmental damage.

About the authors

R. Yu Kolobov

Federal Research Centre “A.E. Favorsky Irkutsk Institute of Chemistry of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences”; Law Institute of Irkutsk State University

Email: kolobov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1488-7530
ResearcherId: H-4644-2016
Candidate of Sciences (Law), Associate Professor, Researcher Irkutsk, Russiaт Federation; Irkutsk, Russiaт Federation

References

  1. О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон «Об охране окружающей среды» и отдельные законодательные акты Российской Федерации от 30 декабря 2021 г. № 446-ФЗ. Собрание законодательства РФ. 2022. № 1 (ч. 1) ст. 15.
  2. Закон включён в 103 главу 42 раздела Кодекса Соединённых Штатов Америки. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title42/html/USCODE-2011-title42-chap103.htm#9601_3 (accessed 15.10.2023).
  3. Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act. Available at: https://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/regs/statutes/bcsra.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  4. U.S.C. § 9601 (22). Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/9601 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  5. U.S.C. § 9661. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/9661 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  6. Economic Impacts of Superfund Taxes. P. 2–1. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2018-02/documents/ee-0096_1-2_acc.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  7. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-117publ169/uslm/PLAW-117publ169.xml (accessed 15.12.2023).
  8. Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-117publ58 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  9. U.S.C. § 1321 (d). Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2018-title33/pdf/USCODE-2018-title33-chap26.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  10. § 311(b)(2)(A) Федерального закона о контроле за загрязнением вод (англ. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321 (b)(2)(A) и § 112 Закона о чистом воздухе (42 U.S.C. §7412). Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapter-J/part-302/section-302.4 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  11. Appendix A to Part 300 – The Hazard Ranking System. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/100002489.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  12. Clarifying the Definition of «Site» Under the National Priorities List. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/174025.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  13. Superfund: National Priorities List (NPL). Available at: https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=33cebcdfdd1b4c3a8b51d416956c41f1 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  14. Population Surrounding 1,881 Superfund Sites. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-08/FY22%20Population%20Estimates%20Superfund%20Final.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  15. Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) Where You Live Map. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available at: https://epa.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=33cebcdfdd1b4c3a8b51d416956c41f1 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  16. Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/fedfac/community-environmental-response-facilitation-act (accessed 15.12.2023).
  17. Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA) Report Fort Devens Facility Fort Devens, Massachusetts. Available at: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA282109.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  18. Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA) Report I Umatilla Depot Activity Hermiston, Oregon. Available at: https://www.umadra.com/sites/umadra.com/files/Files/historicaldocuments/historical_data/HD0020_CERFA_1994_part1.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  19. Citizen Excellence in Community Involvement Award. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/citizen-excellence-community-involvement-award (accessed 15.12.2023).
  20. Superfund Community Involvement University. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/superfund-community-involvement-university (accessed 15.12.2023).
  21. Guidance for Supporting Community Advisory Groups at Superfund Sites. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/100002540.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  22. Pre-CERCLA Screening Guidance United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Land and Emergency Management OLEM Directive 9200.3-107. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/196807.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  23. Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assessments Under CERCLA. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/157081.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  24. Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/174029.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  25. Docket Reference Manual Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/docket-reference-manual-nov-2013.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  26. Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/100001529.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  27. Guidance for Conducting Treatability Studies under CERCLA. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/175665.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  28. Feasibility Study Analysis for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/175672.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  29. A guide to preparing Superfund Proposed Plans, Records of Decision, and Other Remedy Selection Decision Documents. P. 1–5. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-02/documents/rod_guidance.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  30. Remedial Design / Remedial Action Handbook. Available at: https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/156935.pdf (accessed 15.12.2023).
  31. Redevelopment Economics at Superfund Sites. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/superfund-redevelopment/redevelopment-economicssuperfund-sites (accessed 15.12.2023).
  32. U.S.C. § 9620. Available at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/9620 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  33. Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/summary-small-business-liability-relief-andbrownfields-revitalization-act (accessed 15.12.2023).
  34. Part 312 – Innocent Landowners, Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries. Available at: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-40/chapter-I/subchapterJ/part-312 (accessed 15.12.2023).
  35. Akey, P., Appel, I. 2021. The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution. Journal of Finance, vol. 76, № 1, pp. 5–56.
  36. Baller, J. 1990. The Petroleum Exclusion – Stronger That Ever after Wilshire Westwood. SMU Law Revie, vol. 43, № 3, P. 915–928.
  37. Colten, C. A Historical Perspective on Industrial Wastes and Groundwater Contamination. Geographical Review. 1991. vol. 81. № 2. pp. 215–228.
  38. Davis, C. 1985. Implementing the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976: Problems and Prospects. Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 9, № 2, pp. 218–236.
  39. DeMeo, K. 1994. Is CERCLA Working? An Analysis of the Settlement and Contrubition Provisions. St. John`s Law Review, vol. 68, № 2, P. 493–526.
  40. Ehlers, W.C. 1995. Who Pays? PRP Liability for CERCLA Investigations. Ohio State Journal, vol. 56, P. 259–276.
  41. Fjelland, R. 2016. When Laypeople are Right and Experts are Wrong: Lessons from Love Canal. HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, vol. 16, pp. 105–125.
  42. Колобов Р.Ю. Системы торговли квотами на выброс парниковых газов как основной элемент климатической политики: российский и зарубежный опыт / Право и инновации: цифровизация, промышленность, экология: монография. Иркутск: Изд-во ИГУ. 2023. 152 c.
  43. Maloney, J.P.S. 1992. A Legislative History of Liability Under CERCLA. Seton Hall Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, vol. 16, № 2, P. 517–550.
  44. Мальцев С.А., Вебер Е.В., Иноземцев В.А., Цапок М.В., Беляков П.Е., Ковтун В.А., Антохин А.А. О ходе выполнения первоочередных мероприятий по устранению накопленного вреда окружающей среде от деятельности химических предприятий на территории г. Усолье-Сибирское Иркутской области. Вестник войск РХБ защиты. 2021. № 2. С. 136–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35825/2587-5728-2021-5-2-136-148.
  45. Nagle, J.C. 1997. CERCLA’s Mistales. William and Mary Law Review, vol. 38, P. 1405-1463.
  46. O`Neil, S.G. 2007. Superfund: Evaluating the Impact of Executive Order 12898. Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 115, № 7, pp. 1087–1093.
  47. Panzer, J.E. 1996. Apportioning CERCLA Liability: Cost Recovery or Contribution, Where Does a PRP Stand? Fordham Environmental Law Review, vol. 7, № 2, P. 437–482.
  48. Reinfelder, J.R., Jansen, S.E. 2019. Tracking legacy mercury in the Hackensack River estuary using mercury stable isotopes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 375, pp. 121–129.
  49. Saint-Amour, T. 1996. Is It Consistent or Not Inconsistent - The Question Remains Unanswered following Washington State Department of Transportation v. Washington Natural Gas Co. Villanova Environmental Law Journal, vol. 7, № 2. P. 401–439.
  50. Sanchez-Castro, I., Molina, L., Prieto-Fernandez, M.A., Segura A. Past, present and future trends in the remediation of heavy-metal contaminated soil - Remediation techniques applied in real soil-contamination events. Heliyon. 2023. vol. 9. № 6. Art. e16692. P. 1–24.
  51. Scheller, J.L. 2005. No Good Deed Goes Unpunished: The CERCLA Liability Exposure Unfortunately Created by Pre-acquisition Soil Testing. Michigan Law Review, vol. 103, № 7, P. 1930–1950.
  52. Thomson, J. 2015. Toxic Residents: Health and Citizenship at Love Canal. Journal of Social History, vol. 50. № 1. pp. 1–20.
  53. Weinberg, P. 1988. Masquerade for Privilege: Deregulation Undermining Environmental Protection. Washington and Lee Law Review, vol. 45, № 4, P. 1321–1343.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences