Economics, Oikonomia, Domostroi: Introduction to the Anthropology of Household

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article is an introduction to the issue’s special theme on “Economic Anthropology of Household Outside Metropolitan Areas in Contemporary Russia”, featuring contributions by Lidia Rakhmanova, Aleksandra Kasatkina, Daria Tereshina, and Polina Yarovaya. This article contributes to rethinking economic anthropology in terms of culturally specific categories under study. It does so by revisiting the role of household in the genealogy of “economy,” and specifically by looking at Russian terms domokhozaistvo and domostroi. The article shows how domokhozaistvo harks back to oikonomia as Aristotile’s “art of running household” and the new testament’s divine management of the world as god’s home. In turn, domostroi evokes the name of the 16th century Moscow courtly instructions that combine these classical Greek and Christian connotations. The article also suggests thinking through the implications of the Aristotilian categorical foundation of the “economy” in ways in which it is part to an oikonomic ethical judgement based on the state of exception. This allows us, on the one hand, to rethink economic anthropology as part of the anthropology of ethics, and, on the other, to reconceptualize its ethnographic methodologies which “case studies” frequently follow the non-typical and are not necessarily representative.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Nikolay V. Ssorin-Chaikov

Higher School of Economics – Saint Petersburg Branch

Author for correspondence.
Email: nssorinchaikov@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7521-6912

PhD, доцент

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Afanasiev, A.N. 1850. Ob arheologicheskom znachenii “Domostroia” [On the Archaeological Significance of the “Domostroi”]. Otechestvennye zapiski 7: 33–46.
  2. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  3. Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Agamben, G. 2011. The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  5. Barth, F. 1959. Segmentary Opposition and the Theory of Games: A Study of Pathan Organization. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 1: 5–21.
  6. Bentham, J. 1791. Panopticon, Or the Inspection-House. Dublin: T. Payne.
  7. Cessario, R. 1996. Epieikeia and the Accomplishment of the Just. In Aquinas and Empowerment: Classical Ethics for Ordinary Lives, edited by G. Simon Harak, 170–206. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 1996.
  8. Cheal, D.J. 1988. The Gift Economy. London: Routledge.
  9. Englund, H. 2006. Prisoners of Freedom: Human Rights and the African Poor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  10. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
  11. Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality. Vol. I, An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
  12. Foucault, M. 2007. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège De France (1977–1978). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége De France (1978–1979). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  15. Kolesov, V.V. 1994. Domostroi kak pamiatnik srednevekovoi kul’tury [Domostroi as a Literary Monument of Medieval Culture]. In Domostroi [Domostroi], edited by V.V. Kolesov and V.V. Rozhdestvenskaya, 301–357. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
  16. Kondratieva, T. 2006. Kormit’ i pravit’: o vlasti v Rossii XVI–XX vv. [To Feed and to Govern: On Power in Russia of the 16th–20th Centuries]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.
  17. Kotsonis, Y. 2014. States of Obligation: Taxes and Citizenship in the Russian Empire and Early Soviet Republic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  18. Lambek, M. 2010. Toward an Ethics of the Act. In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by M. Lambek, 39–64. New York: Fordham University Press.
  19. Levi-Strauss, C. 1987. Introduction to the Work of Marcel Mauss. London: Routlege; Kegan Paul.
  20. Likhachev, D.S. 1985. Literatura “gosudarstvennogo ustroeniia” (seredina XVI v.) [Literature of the “State Building”]. In Pamiatniki literatury Drevnei Rusi: seredina XVI v. [Literary Monuments of the Ancient Russia (the Middle of 16th Century], edited by L.A. Dmitriev and D.S. Lihhachev, 5–16. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaia literatura.
  21. Malinowski, B. 1922. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: G. Routledge & Sons, ltd., 1922.
  22. Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
  23. Mauss, M. 1990. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
  24. Merridale, C. 2013. Red Fortress: The Secret Heart of Russia’s History. New York: Metropolitan Books.
  25. Miller, D., ed. 2001. Home Possessions: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors. Oxford: Berg.
  26. Moore, H.L. 1992. Households and Gender Relations: The Modelling of the Economy. In Understanding Economic Process, edited by S. Ortiz and S. Lees, 131–148. Lanham: University Press of America.
  27. Paxson, M. 2005. Solovyovo: The Story of Memory in a Russian Village. Boomington: Indiana University Press.
  28. Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.
  29. Rakhmanova, L.Y. 2019. Rybaki i kontroliruiushchie instantsii na Obi: pravoprimenenie v teni lokal’nykh pravil igry [Fishermen and Supervisory Instances on the Ob’ River: Law Enforcement in the Shadow of Local Rules of the Game]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 45–60.
  30. Robbins, L.B. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.
  31. Rogers, D. 2006. How to be a Khoziain in a Transforming State: State Formation and the Ethics of Governance in Post-Soviet Russia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 4: 915–945. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750600034X
  32. Schmitt, C. 1985. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  33. Shestakov, S.P. 1901. Vizantiiskii tip “Domostroia” i cherty ego skhodstva s “Domostroiem” Sil’vestra [Bizantian Type of “Domostroi” and Its Similarities with the “Domostroi” by Sil’vestr]. Vizantiiskii vremennik VIII: 38–63.
  34. Slezkin, Y. 2019. Dom Pravitel’stva [The House of Government]. Moscow: Litres.
  35. Sobolevskii, S.I. 1935. Vvedenie [Introduction]. In Sokraticheskie sochineniia [Socratic Writings], 247–249. Moscow: Akademiia, 1935.
  36. Strathern, M. 1988. Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems With Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  37. Tereshina, D. 2021. Managing Firms and Families: Work and Values in a Russian City. Munster: Verlag.
  38. Tyler, S. 1986. Post-Modern Ethnography. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, edited by J. Clifford and G. Marcus, 122–140. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  39. Weber, M. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Sciences. New York: Free Press.
  40. Wilk, R.R., ed. 2019. The Household Economy: Reconsidering the Domestic Mode of Production. London: Routledge.
  41. Yan, Y. 2012. The Gift and Gift Economy. In A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, edited by J.G. Carrier, 246–461. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  42. Yanagisako, S.J. 1979. Family and Household: The Analysis of Domestic Groups. Annual Review of Anthropology 1: 161–205.
  43. Yudina, T.N. 2014. Novyi domostroi. Konstituiruiushchaia universal’naia perspektivnaia ekonomicheskaia sistema Rossii [New Domostroi: Consitutitive Universal Economic System of Russia]. Moscow: TEIS.
  44. Zabelin, I. 2019. Domashnii byt russkikh tsarei v XVI i XVII stoletiiakh: gosudarev dvor, ili dvorets [House life of Russian Tsars of the 16th–17th Centuries: The State Court or Palace]. Moscow: Litres.
  45. Zeitlyn, D. 2003. Gift Economies in the Development of Open Source Software: Anthropological Reflections. Research Policy 7: 1287–1291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00053-2

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences