Catalytic properties of a nanozyme based on silver nanoparticles immobilized in a polymethacrylate matrix

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

This article presents studies on the catalytic, peroxidase-like properties of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) immobilized in polymethacrylate matrix (PMM). Ag NPs were prepared by thermal reduction of silver cations pre-immobilized in PMM. The morphology of the nanocomposite was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and the average size of the synthesized individual spherical nanoparticles was 18 ± 5 nm. It was demonstrated that silver nanoparticles immobilized in a polymethacrylate matrix (PMM-Ag0) exhibit pronounced peroxidase-like activity in the oxidation reaction of the chromogenic substrate – indigocarmine in the presence of H₂O₂. The Michaelis–Menten model was used to assess the kinetic parameters of the reaction. The values of Michaelis constant (Km) observed for indigocarmine and H₂O₂ (0.1 mM and 1.0 mM, respectively) show strong affinity of the substrates to silver nanoparticles in PMM.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

S. Bragina

National Research Tomsk State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: braginask@gmail.com
Ресей, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050

N. Gavrilenko

National Research Tomsk State University

Email: braginask@gmail.com
Ресей, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050

N. Saranchina

National Research Tomsk State University

Email: braginask@gmail.com
Ресей, Lenin Ave., 36, Tomsk, 634050

M. Gavrilenko

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

Email: braginask@gmail.com
Ресей, Lenin Ave., 30, Tomsk, 634050

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Zhang R., Yan X., Fan K. // Acc. Mater. Res. 2021. V. 2. P. 534.
  2. Tang G., He J., Liu J., Yan X., Fan K. // Exploration. 2021. V. 1. № 1. Р. 75.
  3. Li X., Zhu H., Liu P., Wang M., Pan J., Qiu F., Ni L., Niu X. // TrAC Trend. Anal. Chem. 2021. V. 143. 116379.
  4. Alula M.T., Feke K. // J. Clust. Sci. 2023. V. 34. № 1. Р. 614.
  5. Yan W.U., Zhou J.M., Jiang Y.S., Wen L.I., Meng-Jie H.E., Xiao Y., Chen J.Y. // Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2022. V. 50. № 12. 100187.
  6. Cui Y., Lai X., Liang B., Liang Y., Sun H., Wang L. // ACS Omega. 2020. V. 5. № 12. Р. 6804.
  7. Wang H., Wan K., Shi X. // Adv. Mater. 2019. V. 31. № 45. 1805368.
  8. Jiang C., Wei X., Bao S., Tu H., Wang W. // RSC Adv. 2019. V. 9. № 71. 41568.
  9. Li D., Tian R., Kang S., Chu X.Q., Ge D., Chen X. // Food Chem. 2022. V. 393. 133386.
  10. Karim M.N., Anderson S.R., Singh S., Ramanathan R., Bansal V. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018. V. 110. P. 8.
  11. Saranchina N.V., Bazhenova O.A., Bragina S.K., Semin V.O., Gavrilenko N.A., Volgina T.N., Gavrilenko M.A. // Talanta. 2024. V. 275. 126159.
  12. Bragina S.K., Bazhenova O.A., Gavrilenko M.M., Chubik M.V., Saranchina N.V., Volgina T.N., Gavrilenko N.A. // Mendeleev Commun. 2023. V. 33. № 2. P. 263.
  13. Gavrilenko N.A., Saranchina N.V. // J. Anal. Chem. 2010. V. 65. № 2. Р. 153.
  14. Tolstov A.L., Lebedev E.V. // Theor. Exp. Chem. 2012. V. 48. № 4. P. 211.
  15. Lian J., Yin D., Zhao S., Zhu X., Liu Q., Zhang X., Zhang X. // Colloid Surface A. 2020. V. 603. 125283.
  16. Lian Q., Chen L., Peng G., Zheng X., Liu Z., Wu S. // Chem. Phys. 2023. V. 570. 111895.
  17. Darabdhara G., Sharma B., Das M.R., Boukherroub R., Szunerits S. // Sensor. Actuat. B: Chem. 2017. V. 238. P. 851.
  18. Jiang C., Bai Z., Yuan F., Ruan Z., Wang W. // Spectrochim. Acta A. 2022. Vol. 265. 120348.
  19. Wei F., Cui X., Wang Z., Dong C., Li J., Han X. // Chem. Eng. J. 2021. V. 408. 127240.
  20. Alula M.T., Hendricks-Leukes N.R. // Spectrochim. Acta A. 2024. V. 322. 124830.
  21. Mazhani M., Alula M.T., Murape D. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2020. V. 1107. P. 193.
  22. Khagar P., Bagde A.D., Sarode B., Maldhure A.V., Wankhade A.V. // Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022. V. 141. 109622.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Absorption spectra of PMM-Ag0 at different Ag contents in PMM depending on the contact time with AgNO3 solution: 1 – 4 min (aAg = 0.56 wt.%); 2 – 3 min (aAg = 0.29 wt.%); 3 – 2 min (aAg = 0.17 wt.%).

Жүктеу (526KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Absorption spectra of PMM-Ag0 at different storage times.

Жүктеу (676KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. SEM images of Ag nanoparticles in PMM obtained by thermal reduction, at scales of 2 μm (a) and 400 nm (b).

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Size distribution of Ag nanoparticles in PMM.

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Photograph and absorption spectra of solutions: 1 – indigo carmine, 2 – indigo carmine + H2O2, 3 – indigo carmine + PMM-Ag0, 4 – indigo carmine + H2O2 + PMM-Ag0. Cindigo carmine = 2.2 × 10–4 M, CH2O2 = 2.7 × 10–3 M, pH 4.0, reaction time – 50 min.

Жүктеу (603KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of indigo carmine conversion (ΔA/A0) on reaction conditions: a – Ag nanoparticle content in PMM, b – pH value, c – temperature. Reaction conditions: Cindigo carmine = 2.2 × 10–4 M, CH2O2 = 2.7 × 10–3 M.

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Kinetic curves of indigo carmine concentration oxidized by H2O2 in the presence of PMM-Ag0 as a function of time: a – at an initial indigo carmine concentration of 9.5 × 10–4 M and initial H2O2 concentrations of 1.6 × 10–4 (1), 5.3 × 10–4 (2), 1.6 × 10–3 (3), 2.7 × 10–3 (4), and 3.7 × 10–3 M (5); b – at an initial H2O2 concentration of 2.6 × 10–3 M and initial indigo carmine concentrations of 2.0 × 10–5 (1), 3.9 × 10–5 (2), 1.1 × 10–4 (3), 1.9 × 10–4 (4), and 2.6 × 10–4 M (5).

Жүктеу (863KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 8. Curves of initial rate (V0) of indigo carmine oxidation in the presence of PMM-Ag0 versus initial concentrations of H2O2 (a) and indigo carmine (b) in the studied solutions. Graphs of V0 of indigo carmine oxidation in the presence of PMM-Ag0 versus initial concentrations of H2O2 (c) and indigo carmine (d) in Lineweaver–Burk coordinates.

Жүктеу (1MB)
Метадеректер
10. Oxidation of indigo carmine

Жүктеу (538KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025