Art and Prostheses: on the Ways of Human Ectasy and Synchronization of Worlds

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article deals with the problem of defining the boundaries of the human and its connection with the concept of “experience” in philosophical and art history. To be human means to have the experience of possessing a human body, this experience is constantly changing due to many factors: scientific and technical progress, the emergence of new philosophical and cultural concepts, new ethical approaches, and also as a result of the fact that art becomes a conduit of these new modern ideas. The author proposes to use the concept of ectasia (stretching) to describe the practices of human interaction with his/her body and redefining the boundaries of the body, i.e. to work with posthumanist problematics. The question is then posed: can reincarnation, which humans have practiced since ancient times, allow for a “non-human” experience? For answers, the author turns to philosophical texts and works of art from the field of Art&Science that express themselves in the field of the described problematic. Art projects together with theoretical texts become a tool of analysis and the notion of prosthesis as a means of accessing the posthuman through art is discussed. Also, art practices are considered as one of the methods of humanitarian research. The conclusion formulates criteria for determining whether art objects belong to “prostheses” that expand the boundaries of experience in the direction of interspecies communication. Such practices in the territory of contemporary art can be a useful exercise that trains mental flexibility and empathy for other species, and can contribute to awareness of the world around us and of ourselves.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Anastasia Alekhina

Higher School of Economics

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: contact@alekhina.cc

Postgraduate Student of the School of Design

俄罗斯联邦, 20, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000

参考

  1. Agamben D. Otkrytoe: chelovek i zhivotnoe [Open: Man and Animal], transl. from Ital. by B.M. Skuratov. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2012.
  2. Alekhina A. Sinteticheskaya morfologiya. Performans. PERMM Museum, 2024 [Electronic resource] URL: https://alekhina.cc/synthetic-morphology/ (date of access: 07.01.2025).
  3. Alekhina A., Pisarev A. Art&Science i postgumanizm: tekhnonauka, estetika i telesnost’ [Art& Science and Posthumanism: Technoscience, esthetics and Physicality]. Nauka televideniya. 2023. № 19(3). P. 43–67.
  4. Arendt H. Vita Activa, ili o deyatel’noj zhizni [Vita Activa, or about Active Life], transl. from Germ. by V.V. Bibihin. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 2017.
  5. Arhangel’skaya I.G. M. MakLyuen i ego kniga “Ponimanie sredstv kommunikacii: Prodolzhenie cheloveka” [Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man]. Vestnik NNGU. 2008. № 4.
  6. Baudrillard Zh. Prozrachnost’ zla [La Transparence du Mal], transl. from French ed by L. Lyubarskaja, E. Markovskaja. Moskow: Dobrosvet Publ., 2000. Р. 32–33.
  7. Viril’o P. Mashina zreniya [La machine de vision], transl. from French ed by A.V. Shestakov by V.Yu. Bystrov. St. Petersburgb.: Nauka Publ., 2004. P. 63–84.
  8. Caillois R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral’noe [Myth and Man. Man and the Sacred], transl. from French. ed by S.N. Zenkin. Moscow: OGI Publ., 2003.
  9. Ketova T. Telesnost’ kak proizvedenie iskusstva v epohu antropologicheskih transformacij. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. 2013. № 4.
  10. Klebaner V. Aleksandr Bogdanov i ego nasledie. Voprosy filosofii. 2003. N 1. P. 105–110.
  11. Nagel’ T. Kakovo byt’ letuchej mysh’yu? [What is it Like to be a Bat?], transl. from Engl. ed by M.E. Eskina. Dennet D., Hofshtadter D. Glaz razuma. Samara: Bahrah-M Publ., 2003.
  12. Nansi Zh-L. [Corpus], compil., notes ed by E. Petrovskaja. Moscow: Ad Marginem Publ., 1999.
  13. Safronov P., Frolov A. Soznanie mira i ontologicheskij opyt [Consciousness of the World and Ontological Experience]. Censura, 2006 [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://censura.ru/articles/worldexp.htm (date of access: 09.09.2024).
  14. Stepanov M. Mashiny abstrakcij i konec protezirovaniya. Mediafilosofiya. 2009. V. 2, N 2. P. 123–137.
  15. Sloterdaĭk P. [Sfery. Mikrosferologiya. V. I. Puzyri]. St. Petersburgb Publ., 2005.
  16. Hajdegger M. Bytie i vremya [Sein und Zeit], transl. from Germ. ed by V.V. Bibihin. Har'kov: Folio Publ., 2003.
  17. Forum: novye tekhnologii i telesnost’ kak predmet antropologicheskih issledovanij [Forum: New Technologies and Physicality as a Subject of Anthropological Research]. Antropologicheskij forum. 2018. № 38. S. 11–82.
  18. Expanding Human Perception: The Interface Project by Jose Chavarría. PAI_32, 2024 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://pai32.com/2024/08/06/expanding-human-perception-the-interface-project-by-jose-chavarria/ (date of access: 09.09.2024).
  19. Rosell M. ART ORIENTÉ OBJET, blurring the constraints of our relationship with animals // CLOT Magazine, 2015. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://clotmag.com/biomedia/art-oriente-objet (date of access: 09.09.2024).
  20. Menstruation Machine – Takashi’s Take // SPUTNICO! 2024 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://sputniko.com/Menstruation-Machine (date of access: 09.09.202).
  21. Until I Die – Dmitry Morozov // ::vtol::, 2024 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://vtol.cc/filter/works/until-I-die (date of access: 07.01.2025).
  22. Stelarc web-site // bio [Электронный ресурс] http://stelarc.org/projects.php (date of access: 07.01.25)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Art Orient. Objet (France) "Let the horse live in me!". Photo: Yuri Palmin. Source: https://laboratoria.art/ru/da-zhivet-inoe-vo-mne-izobretaya-gibridnye-soobshhestva1/

下载 (381KB)
3. Dmitry Morozov (Russia). "Until I Die", sound installation and performance, Ljubljana, 2016. Source: provided by the author

下载 (488KB)
4. Anastasia Alyokhina (Russia). Exhibition "Open Bodies", PERMM Museum, Perm. Photo: Alexander Beloborodov. Source: author's personal archive

下载 (465KB)

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025