The Self-help Practices of Students during the Period of “Emerging Adulthood” in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic and their Relation to a Personality’s Subjective Well-being

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the self-help practices of students in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and their relation to a personality’s subjective well-being during the period of “emerging adulthood”. The relevance of the research is determined by high psychical, intellectual, and psycho-emotional loads, especially in the context of COVID-19 pandemic, which makes special demands on resources to cope with them. The sample of the study consists of college students, undergraduate students, master’s degree and PhD students. We tested the hypothesis that self-help practices in difficult real-life situations is depending on the subjective well-being level. The study respondents are aged 16-29 (M = 21, SD = 3.45), 201 are female and 78 are male. We use “Mental Health Continuum” and an open question about preferred self-help practices. The study identified six categories of practices: Self-support practices and self-reliance; Social support: “significant” others and people in the same situation; Institutional support: teachers and mentors; Psychological assistance: psychotherapists and services; Contextual and situational factors and No need for help. At the same time, the differences between the groups of high and low subjective well-being levels are not statistically significant. The only category, the frequency of which significantly predominates among the more prosperous, is “Institutional support: teachers and mentors”. The research results can be used in training programs to improve the level of subjective well-being of students and support programs in coping with difficulties.

About the authors

Milana R. Khachaturova

HSE University

20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation

Victoria G. Yerofeeva

HSE University

20 Myasnitskaya Str., Moscow 101000, Russian Federation

Vasily A. Bardadymov

“Scholae Mundi Russia” Charity Foundation

4/2 Romanov Lane, 125009 Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Анцыферова Л.И. Личность в трудных жизненных условиях:переосмысливание, преобразование ситуаций и психологическая защита // Психологический журнал. 1994. № 1. С. 3–18.
  2. Аракелов Г.Г., Аршинова В.В., Жданова Г.Е. Стресс-факторы, влияющие на формирование психосоциальной устойчивости личности в период студенчества // Психологическая наука и образование. 2008. Т. 13, № 2. С. 52–60.
  3. Битюцкая Е.В. Трудная жизненная ситуация: критерии когнитивного оценивания // Психологическая наука и образование. 2007. №4. С. 87–93.
  4. Григорьева М.В. Субъективное благополучие личности как результат школьной адаптации в разных условиях обучения // Психологическая наука и образование. 2009. № 2. С. 41–45.
  5. Клементьева М.В. «Подлинное Я» как предиктор формирующейся взрослости студентов // Психологическая наука и образование. 2020. Том 25. № 3. С. 64–74.
  6. Маленова А.Ю., Маленов А.А., Федотова Е.Е. Структура субъективного благополучия и ее гендерные особенности у студенческой молодежи // Вестник Омского университета. Серия «Психология». 2019. № 3. С. 22–33.
  7. Матюшкина Е.Я. Учебный стресс у студентов при разных формах обучения // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2016. Т. 24, № 2. С. 47–63. doi: 10.17759/cpp.2016240204
  8. Нартова-Бочавер С.К., Бардадымов В.А., Ерофеева В.Г., Хачатурова М.Р., Хачатрян Н.Г. Трудные жизненные ситуации обучающейся молодежи // Вопросы образования. 2023 (в печати).
  9. Осин Е.Н., Леонтьев Д.А. Краткие русскоязычные шкалы диагностики субъективного бла¬гополучия: психометрические характеристики и сравнительный анализ // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2020. № 1. С. 117–142.
  10. Фомина Т.Г., Моросанова В.И. Особенности взаимосвязи осознанной саморегуляции, субъективного благополучия и академической успеваемости у младших школьников // Экспериментальная психология. 2019. Т. 12, №. 3. С. 164–175.
  11. Хачатурова М.Р. Совладающий репертуар личности: обзор зарубежных исследований // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2013. Т. 10. №3. С. 160–169.
  12. Arnett J.J. Emerging adulthood: What is it, and what is it good for? Child Development Perspectives. 2007. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 68–73.
  13. Arnett J.J. Presidential address: The emergence of emerging adulthood: A personal history. Emerging Adulthood. 2014. Vol. 2, N 3. P. 155–162. doi: 10.1177/2167696814541096
  14. Beiter R., Nash R., McCrady M., Rhoades D., Linscomb M., Clarahan M., Sammut S. The prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and stress in a sample of college students. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2015. Vol. 173. P. 90–96.
  15. Bhattacharya A., Mehrotra S., Bhola P. Challenges to Mental Well-being, Perceived Resources, and Felt Needs During COVID-19 Among College Youth in India. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2022. Vol. 21, N 1(4). URL: https://www.ojhas.org/issue81/2022-1- 4.html (date of access: 10.03.2023).
  16. Chy S. Emerging Adulthood: Impacts of Adult Care on Education, Work, and Well-Being. Emerging Adulthood. 2023.
  17. Cutuli D. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2014. Sep 19; 8: 175.
  18. Daly M., Robinson E. Psychological distress and adaptation to the COVID-19 crisis in the United States. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2020. Vol. 136. P. 603–609.
  19. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin. 1984. Vol. 95, N 3. P. 542–575.
  20. Diener E., Lucas R.E., Scollon C.N. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. Am Psychol. 2006. Vol. 61, N 4. P. 305–314.
  21. Galanaki E., Sideridis G. Dimensions of Emerging Adulthood, Criteria for Adulthood, and Identity Development in Greek Studying Youth: A Person-Centered Approach. Emerging Adulthood. 2019. Vol. 7, N 6. P. 411–431.
  22. Harms P. D., Brady L., Wood D., Silard A. Resilience and well-being. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. Salt Lake City, UT: DEF Publishers. 2018.
  23. Hsieh H.F, Shannon S.E. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 2005. Vol. 15, N 9. P. 1277–1288.
  24. Hurst C.S., Baranik L.E., Daniel F. College student stressors: A review of the qualitative research. Stress and Health. 2013. Vol. 29, N 4. P. 275–285. doi: 10.1002/smi.2465
  25. Kalisch R., Baker D.G., Basten U., Boks M.P. et al. The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders. Nature Human Behaviour. 2017. Vol. 1, N 11. P. 784–790.
  26. Kansky J., Diener E. Benefits of Well-Being: Health, Social Relationships, Work, and Resilience. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing. 2017. Vol. 1, N 2. P. 129–169.
  27. Kern M.L., Waters L.E., Adler A., White M.A. A multidimensional approach to measuring well-being in students: Application of the PERMA framework. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2015. Vol. 10, N 3. P. 262–271.
  28. Keyes C.L.M. Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 61, N 2. P. 121–140.
  29. Lopez-Zafra E., Ramos-Alvarez M.M., El Ghoudani K., Luque-Reca O. et al. Social Support and Emotional Intelligence as Protective Resources for Well-Being in Moroccan Adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019.
  30. Marks D.F., Yardley L. (ed.). Research methods for clinical and health psychology. Sage, 2004.
  31. Marroquin B., Vine V., Morgan R. Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects of stay-at-home policies, social distancing behavior, and social resources. Psychiatry Research. 2020. Vol. 293, 113419.
  32. Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: Demarcation, varieties, developments. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Freie Universität Berlin. 2019. Vol. 20, N 3. P. 1–26.
  33. Prati G., Pietrantoni, L. Optimism, social support, and coping strategies as factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 2009. Vol. 14, N 5. P. 364–388.
  34. Preetz R., Filser A., Brömmelhaus A., Baalmann T., Feldhaus, M. Longitudinal Changes in Life Satisfaction and Mental Health in Emerging Adulthood During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Risk and Protective Factors. Emerging Adulthood. 2021. Vol. 9, N 5. P. 602–617.
  35. Priestley M., Hall A., Wilbraham S.J., Mistry V. et al. Student perceptions and proposals for promoting wellbeing through social relationships at university. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2022. Vol. 46, N 9. P. 1243–1256.
  36. Rosen J.A., Glennie E.J., Dalton B.W. et al. Noncognitive skills in the classroom: new perspectives on educational research. RTI Press, 2004.
  37. Rueger S.Y., Malecki C.K., Pyun Y., et al. A Meta analytic review of the association between perceived social support and depression in childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin. 2016. Vol. 142, N 10. P. 1017–1067.
  38. Ryff C.D., Keyes C.L.M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995. Vol. 69, N 4. P. 719–727.
  39. Salari N., Hosseinian-Far A., Jalali R., Vaisi-Raygani A. et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Globalization and Health. 2020. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 57.
  40. Schueller S.M., Parks A.C. The science of self-help: Translating positive psychology research into increased individual happiness. European Psychologist. 2014. Vol. 19, N 2. P. 145–155.
  41. Sheldon K.M., Lyubomirsky S. Revisiting the Sustainable Happiness Model and Pie Chart: Can Happiness Be Successfully Pursued? The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2019. P. 1–10.
  42. Szkody E., Stearns M., Stanhope L., McKinney C. Stress‐buffering role of social support during COVID‐19. Family Process. 2020. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12618.
  43. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The State of the World’s Children 2021: On My Mind – Promoting, protecting and caring for children’s mental health, UNICEF, New York, October 2021. URL: https://www.unicef.org/media/114636/file/SOWC-2021-full-report-English.pdf (date of access: 10.03.2023)
  44. Van den Berg Y.H. M., Burk W.J., Cillessen A.H.N., Roelofs K. Emerging Adults’ Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Longitudinal Study on the Importance of Social Support. Emerging Adulthood. 2021. Vol. 9, N 5. P. 618–630.
  45. Vindegaard N., Benros M.E. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020. Vol. 89. P. 531–542.
  46. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., et al. A longitudinal study on the mental health of general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2020. Vol. 87. P. 40–48.
  47. Witt A., Ordonez A., Martin A., et al. Child and adolescent mental health service provision and research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, opportunities, and a call for submissions. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2020. Vol. 14. P. 1–4.
  48. Xiong J., Lipsitz O., Nasri F., Lui L.M.W., et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020. Vol. 277. P. 55–64.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences