Traditions, continuity and innovations in psychological and historical-scientific cognition

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The text was prepared in the order of the discussion on the pages of the Psychological Journal of the article by Yu.N. Oleinik and A.L. Zhuravlev “Scientific traditions as a mechanism of continuity of psycholo-gical cognition”, published in two parts: Part 1. — “The state and difficulties of studying” and Part 2. — “Problems and prospects of research” (Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, № 3–4, 2024). The valuable ideas of the article under discussion, which are important for psychological science and its history, are noted; in addition, controversial provisions are highlighted, and options for their correction and addition are proposed.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. G. Noskova

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: nog4813@mail.ru

ScD (Psychology), Professor, Professor of Department of Work and Engineering Psychology, Faculty of Psychology

Russian Federation, 125009, Moscow, Mokhovaya str., 11/9

References

  1. Bogdanov A.A. Nauka ob obshhestvennom soznanii. Kratkij kurs ideologicheskoj nauki v voprosah i otvetah. Moscow: Knigoizdatel’stvo pisatelej v Moskve, 1914. 199 p.
  2. Gajdenko P.P. Vvedenie. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 3–11.
  3. Gusel’ceva M.S. Ponjatie progressa i ego otrazhenie v naukah o cheloveke. Progress psihologii: Kriterii i priznaki. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, T.D. Marcinkovskaya, A.V. Jurevich. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2009. P. 13–31.
  4. Kuznecova N.I., Rozov M.A. O raznoobrazii nauchnyh revoljucij. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. P. 60–82.
  5. Nosulenko V.N., Terehin V.A. Peredacha znanij: obzor osnovnyh modelej i tehnologij. Jeksperimental’naja psihologija. 2017. V. 10. № 4. P. 96–115.
  6. Olejnik Ju.N., Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 1. Sostojanie i trudnosti izuchenija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 3. P. 5–14.
  7. Olejnik Ju.N. Zhuravlev A.L. Nauchnye tradicii kak mehanizm preemstvennosti psihologicheskogo poznanija. Chast’ 2. Problemy, podhody i perspektivy issledovanija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2024. V. 45. № 4. P. 5–15.
  8. Tradicii i revoljucii v istorii nauki. Ed. P.P. Gajdenko. Moscow: Nauka, 1991. 264 p.
  9. Shackij E. Utopija i tradicija: Perev. s pol’sk. Ed. V.A. Chalikova. Moscow: Progress, 1990. 454 p.
  10. Jurevich A.V. Psihologija i metodologija. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN, 2005. 312 p.
  11. Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creat the Dinamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences