Simeon Bekbulatovich and the question of the «literary game» played by Ivan the Terrible

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

详细

Contesting the latest biography (compiled by A. V. Belyakov) of the Tatar Prince Simeon Bekbulatovich, who, at the request of Ivan the Terrible, had occupied the Moscow throne for a whole year, the author of the article discusses the famous petition addressed by the Tsar to his «substitute». The petition is generally considered to be a sample of the Tsar’s «buffoonish» manner of verbal manipulations, that are also traceable in quite a number of his epistles. The author of the article suggests that Ivan the Terrible’s game technique should be understood as a sequence of actions and statements stimulated by his religious experience. This is in better agreement with the cultural context of the 16th century than the standard references to the sophisticated cruelty of the tyrant, who pretended to be a holy fool.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Dmitrii Bulanin

Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkinskij Dom), Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: dmitriibulanin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5480-7964

Chief Researcher

俄罗斯联邦, St. Petersburg

参考

  1. Beliakov A. V. Chingisidy v Rossii XV–XVII vekov: prosopograficheskoe issledovanie. Riazan’, 2011.
  2. Beliakov A. V. Simeon Bekbulatovich: Primer adaptatsii vykhodtsev s Vostoka v Rossii XVI v. SPb., 2022.
  3. Cherniavskii M. Khan ili vasilevs: Odin iz aspektov russkoi srednevekovoi politicheskoi teorii // Iz istorii russkoi kul’tury. M., 2002. T. 2. Kn. 1. Kievskaia i Moskovskaia Rus’.
  4. Halperin Ch. Simeon Bekbulatovich and Mongol Influence on Ivan’s Muscovy // Russian History. 2012. Vol. 39. № 3.
  5. Ivanov S. A. Blazhennye pokhaby: Kul’turnaia istoriia iurodstva. M., 2005 (ser. «Studia historica»).
  6. Likhachev D. S. Velikoe nasledie: Klassicheskie proizvedeniia literatury Drevnei Rusi. 2-e izd., dop. M., 1979.
  7. Lileev N. V. Simeon Bekbulatovich, khan Kasimovskii, velikii kniaz’ vseia Rusi, vposledstvii velikii kniaz’ Tverskoi, 1567–1616 (Istoricheskii ocherk). Tver’, 1891.
  8. Lotman Iu. M., Uspenskii B. A. Novye aspekty izucheniia kul’tury Drevnei Rusi // Voprosy literatury. 1977. № 3.
  9. Panchenko A. M., Uspenskii B. A. Ivan Groznyi i Petr Velikii: Kontseptsii pervogo monarkha. Stat’ia pervaia // Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury. L., 1983. T. 37.
  10. Poln. sobr. russkikh letopisei. M., 1978. T. 34.
  11. Poslaniia Ivana Groznogo / Podg. teksta D. S. Likhacheva i Ia. S. Lur’e; per. i komm. Ia. S. Lur’e; pod red. V. P. Adrianovoi-Peretts. M.; L., 1951 (ser. «Literaturnye pamiatniki»).
  12. Uspenskii B. A. Tsar’ i patriarkh: Kharizma vlasti v Rossii (Vizantiiskaia model’ i ee russkoe pereosmyslenie). M., 1998.
  13. Uspenskii B. A., Uspenskii F. B. Inocheskie imena na Rusi. M.; SPb., 2017.
  14. Vremennik Ivana Timofeeva / Podg. k pechati, per., komm. O. A. Derzhavinoi; pod red. V. P. Adrianovoi-Peretts. M.; L., 1951 (ser. «Literaturnye pamiatniki»).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024