Russian romanticism as a problem

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Russian Romanticism was not a transitional link between Classicism (Sentimentalism) and Realism. Following in the footsteps of A. Schlegel and J. de Stael, many Russian authors treated the concepts of Classicism and Romanticism as the two all-encompassing notions that describe the entire historical space of the European culture: Classicism was an offspring of pagan antiquity, while Romanticism emerged from the Christian Middle Ages. The same two universal principles were evolving, closely linked together, in the works of the Russian writers of the first third of the 19th century, and they left the historical stage simultaneously.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mariia N. Virolainen

Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkinskij Dom), Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: virolainen@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0892-5556

Chief Researcher

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Baldensperger F. «Romantique» — ses analogues et équivalents // Harvard Studies and Notes in Philology and Literature. 1937. Vol. 19.
  2. Beliak N. V., Virolainen M. N. «Malen’kie tragedii» kak kul’turnyi epos novoevropeiskoi istorii (Sud’ba lichnosti — sud’ba kul’tury) // Pushkin: Issledovaniia i materialy. SPb., 1991. T. 14.
  3. Berkovskii N. Ia. Lektsii i stat’i po zarubezhnoi literature. SPb., 2002.
  4. Bestuzhev-Marlinskii A. A. Soch.: V 2 t. M., 1981. T. 2.
  5. Dmitrieva E. E. Nemetskii klassitsizm // Evropeiskii klassitsizm: Entsiklopedicheskii putevoditel’. T. 1 (v pechati).
  6. Evropeiskii romantizm. M., 1973.
  7. Fedorov F. P. Romanticheskii khudozhestvennyi mir: prostranstvo i vremia. Riga, 1988.
  8. Frizman L. G. Paradoks Katenina // Katenin P. A. Razmyshleniia i razbory. M., 1981.
  9. Gertsen A. I. Sobr. soch.: V 30 t. M., 1954. T. 3.
  10. Istoriia russkoi literatury: V 4 t. L., 1981. T. 2 / Pod red. E. N. Kupreianovoi.
  11. Ivinskii D. P. O Pushkine. M., 2005.
  12. K istorii russkogo romantizma. M., 1973.
  13. Katenin P. A. Razmyshleniia i razbory. M., 1981.
  14. Kiukhel’beker V. K. Puteshestvie. Dnevnik. Stat’i / Izd. podg. N. V. Koroleva, V. D. Rak. L., 1979 (ser. «Literaturnye pamiatniki»).
  15. Kurilov A. S. Nachalo teoreticheskogo osoznaniia romantizma russkoi kritikoi // Istoriia romantizma v russkoi literature: Vozniknovenie i utverzhdenie romantizma v russkoi literature (1790–1825). M., 1979.
  16. Lappo-Danilevskii K. Iu. Russkaia retseptsiia idei I. I. Vinkel’mana: Khronologiia i spetsifika // Drevnost’ i klassitsizm: Nasledie Vinkel’mana v Rossii. Antike und Klassizismus — Winckelmanns Erbe in Russland: Akten des internationalen Kongresses St. Petersburg 30. September — 1. Oktober 2015. Mainz; Ruhpolding; Petersberg, 2017.
  17. Lappo-Danilevskij K. Ju. Gefühl für das Schöne: Johann Joachim Winckelmanns Einfluss auf Literatur und ästhetisches Denken in Russland. Köln; Weimar; Wien, 2007.
  18. Maimin E. A. O russkom romantizme. M., 1975.
  19. Mann Iu. V. Poetika russkogo romantizma. M., 1976.
  20. Mann Iu. V. Russkaia filosofskaia estetika (1820–1830-e gg.). M., 1969.
  21. Modzalevskii B. L. Biblioteka Pushkina: Bibliograficheskoe opisanie. SPb., 1910 (Pushkin i ego sovremenniki: Materialy i issledovaniia. Vyp. 9–10).
  22. Na putiakh k romantizmu: Sb. nauch. trudov. L., 1984.
  23. Nadezhdin N. I. Literaturnaia kritika. Estetika / Vstup. stat’ia, sost. i komm. Iu. Manna. M., 1972.
  24. Polevoi N. A., Polevoi Ks. A. Literaturnaia kritika: Stat’i i retsenzii, 1825–1842 / Sost., vstup. stat’i i komm. V. Berezinoi i I. Sukhikh. L., 1990.
  25. Problemy romantizma v khudozhestvennoi literature i kritike. Kazan’, 1976.
  26. Problemy romantizma: Sb. statei. M., 1967.
  27. Pumpianskii L. V. Klassicheskaia traditsiia: Sobr. trudov po istorii russkoi literatury. M., 2000.
  28. Pushkin A. S. Poln. sobr. soch.: [V 16 t.]. M.; L., 1937–1949. T. 11, 13.
  29. Pushkin A. S. Soch.: Kommentirovannoe izdanie / Pod obshch. red. D. M. Betea. M., 2007. Vyp. 1.
  30. Pushkin v prizhiznennoi kritike: 1820–1827. SPb., 2001.
  31. Russkii romantizm. L., 1978.
  32. Tynianov Iu. N. Arkhaisty i Pushkin // Tynianov Iu. N. Pushkin i ego sovremenniki. M., 1968.
  33. Vaiskopf M. Vliublennyi demiurg: Metafizika i erotika russkogo romantizma. M., 2012.
  34. Vanslov V. V. Estetika romantizma. M., 1966.
  35. Vatsuro V. E. Anton Del’vig — literator // Del’vig A. A. Soch. L., 1986.
  36. Vatsuro V. E. Pushkinskaia pora. SPb., 2000.
  37. Viazemskii P. A. Soch.: V 2 t. M., 1982. T. 2. Literaturno-kriticheskie stat’i / Sost., podg. teksta i komm. M. I. Gillel’sona.
  38. Vigel’ F. F. Zapiski. M., 1928. T. 1.
  39. Vinkel’man I.-I. Izbr. proizvedeniia i pis’ma / Per. s nem. A. A. Aliavdinoi. [M.; L.], 1935.
  40. Vinogradov V. V. Pushkin i russkii literaturnyi iazyk XIX veka // Pushkin — rodonachal’nik novoi russkoi literatury: Sb. nauchno-issledovatel’skikh rabot. M.; L., 1941.
  41. Voprosy romantizma v russkoi literature. Kazan’, 1963.
  42. Zhukovskii V. A. Poln. sobr. soch.: V 20 t. M., 2019. T. 15.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences