BIMETALLIC Pt-Ag CATALYSTS SUPPORTED ON MESOPOROUS SILICON OXIDE MСM-41 IN THE 4-NITROPHENOL REDUCTION

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Mesoporous MCM-41 with a specific surface area of 1134 m2/g was synthesized. Based on it, supported mono- and bimetallic Pt-Ag catalysts with different metal ratios were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation. Using XRD and DRS methods, it was shown that after the reductive high-temperature treatment of Pt-Ag catalysts, metal nanoparticles in contact with Pt and Ag were formed on the surface. The TPR-H2 method showed an increase in the reactivity of bimetallic catalysts compared to monometallic catalysts due to the interaction of AgOx and PtOy centers. The catalysts were studied in the reduction reaction of 4-nitrophenol with sodium borohydride. A significant increase in the rate of reduction of 4-nitrophenol on bimetallic catalysts due to the synergistic effect of Pt and Ag was established.

About the authors

A. S. Savel’eva

National Research Tomsk State University

Tomsk, Russia

E. V. Evdokimova

National Research Tomsk State University

Tomsk, Russia

G. V. Mamontov

National Research Tomsk State University

Email: grigoriymamontov@mail.ru
Tomsk, Russia

References

  1. Lu Ch., Wang X., Zhang J. et al. // Environ. Pollut. 2021. V. 283. P. 117132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117132
  2. Pallares R.M., Karstens S.L., Arino T. et al. // ACS Applied Nano Materials. 2023. V. 6.№10. P. 8141. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c01394
  3. Chatterjee S., Bhattacharya S.K. //ACSOmega. 2021. V. 6.№32. P. 20746. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00896
  4. Maric I., Drazic G., Radin E. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023. V. 607. P. 155073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155073
  5. Chen H., Zhuang Q., Wang H. et al. // Colloids Surf., A. 2022. V. 649. P. 129459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129459
  6. Tokazhanov G., Han S., Lee W. // Catal. Commun. 2021. V. 158. P. 106337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2021.106337
  7. Zhang Yu, Han H., Ma Zh. // Appl. Сatal. A. 2023. V. 665. P. 119377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119377
  8. Filiz B.C. // Adv. Powder Technol. 2020. V. 31. № 9. P. 3845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2020.07.026
  9. Menumerov E., Hughes R.A., Neretina S. // Nano Lett. 2016. V. 16.№12. P. 7791. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03991
  10. Chernykh M., Mikheeva N., Zaikovskii V. et al. // Catalysts. 2020. V. 10. № 5. P. 580. doi: 10.3390/catal1005058
  11. Li W., Ge X., Zhang H. et al. // Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016. V. 3. P. 663. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6QI00002A
  12. Taratayko A., Larichev Yu., Zaikovskii V. et al. // Catal. Today. 2021. V. 375.№1. P. 576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2020.05.001
  13. Salaev M.A., Salaeva A.A., Kharlamova T.S. et al. // Appl. Catal., B. 2021. V. 295. P. 120286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120286
  14. Zuo Sh., Wang X., Yang P. et al. // Catal. Commun. 2017. V. 94. P. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.02.017
  15. Jeong Min Hye, So Jungseo, Oh Jinho et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2023. V. 638. P. 158067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158067
  16. Виканова К.В., Редина Е.А., Капустин Г.И. // Журн. физ. химии. 2022. Т. 96.№1. С. 56. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453722010277
  17. Zhang Y., Zhou J. // J. Catal. 2021. V. 395. P. 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2021.01.025
  18. Lin L., Yao S., Gao R. et al. // Nature Nanotechnology. 2019. V. 14. P. 354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0366-5
  19. Yu W., Porosoff M.D., Chen J.G. // Chem. Rev. 2012. V. 112.№11. P. 5780. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300096b
  20. Эллерт О.Г., Цодиков М.В., Николаев С.А. и др. // Успехи химии. 2014. Т. 83.№8. С. 718. https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2014v083n08ABEH004432
  21. Caravaggio G., Nossova L., Turnbull M. // Catalysts. 2023. V. 13.№6. P. 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13060926.
  22. Wisniewska J., Dziedzic I., Ziolek M. // RSC Adv. 2020. V. 10. P. 14570. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01562H
  23. Wisniewska J., Ziolek M. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. P. 9534. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA28365A
  24. Gonzalez Hernandez N.N., Contreras J. L., Pinto M. et al. // Catalysts. 2020. V. 10. P. 1212. doi: 10.3390/catal10101212.
  25. Intaphong P., Suebsom P., Phuruangrat A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. P. 1600. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621100089
  26. Kharlamova T.S., Salina M.V., Svetlichnyi V.A. // Catal. Today. 2022. V. 384–386. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.08.031
  27. Mamontov G.V., Grabchenko M.V., Sobolev V.I. et al. // Appl. Catal., A. 2016. V. 528. P. 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.10.005
  28. Zhang P., Liu B., Li Y. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. P. 2036. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621140096
  29. Mamontov G.V., Gorbunova A.S., Vyshegorodtseva E.V. et al. // Catal. Today. 2019. V. 333. P. 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.05.015
  30. Martnez-Edo G., Balmori A., Ponton I. et al. // Catalysts. 2018. V. 8. P. 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8120617
  31. Vyshegorodtseva E.V., Larichev Yu.V., Mamontov G.V. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Tech. 2019. V. 92. № 2. P. 496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05034-y
  32. Ravikovitch P.I., Haller G.L., Neimark A.V. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998. V. 76–77. P. 203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00047-5
  33. Kolesnikov A.L., Uhlig H., Mollmer J. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017. V. 240. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.11.017
  34. Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87.№9–10. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
  35. Panecatl Bernal Y., Alvarado J., Rojas R. et al. // Optik. 2019. V. 185. P. 429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.117
  36. Shinji K., Mijuki I., Asako T. et al. // Appl. Catal., A. 2012. V. 427–428. P. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2012.03.033
  37. Dutov V.V., Mamontov G.V., Zaikovskii V.I. et al. // Appl. Catal., B. 2018. V. 221. P. 598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.051
  38. Бондарчук И.С., Мамонтов Г.В. // Кинетика и катализ. 2015. Т. 56.№3. С. 382. http://doi.org/10.7868/S0453881115030028
  39. Czaplinska J., Decyk P., Ziolek M. // Appl. Catal., A. 2015. V. 504. P. 361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.054
  40. Lee J., Jang E.J., Oh D.G. et al. // J. Catal. 2020. V. 385. P. 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2020.03.019
  41. Barrales-Cortes C.A., Perez-Pastenes H., Pina-Victoria J.C. et al. // Top. Catal. 2020. V. 63.№5–6. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-020-01312-0
  42. Smiechowicz I., Kocemba I., Rogowski J. et al. // Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 2018. V. 124. P. 633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-018-1383-3
  43. Hung Ch., Yeh Ch., Shih Ch. et al. // Catalysts. 2019. V. 9. P. 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9040362
  44. Grabchenko M.V., Mamontov G.V., Zaikovskii V.I. et al. // Catal. Today. 2019. V. 333. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.05.014
  45. Zhang J., Gao K., Wang S. et al. // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. P. 6447. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra26142f
  46. Liao G., Gong Y., Zhong L. et al. // Nano Research. 2019. V. 12.№10. P. 2407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-019-2441-5
  47. Varshney Sh., Bar-Ziv R., Zidki T. // ChemCatChem. 2020. V. 12. P. 4680. doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202000584

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences