Chemosensor properties of Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 nanocomposite

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The method of modification of accordion-like complex composition Ti0.2V1.8CTx MXene with tin(IV) and vanadium oxides by hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2 in water-alcoholic medium in the presence of dispersed particles of two-dimensional vanadium-titanium carbide was developed. The Ti0.2V1.8CTx-10mol.% SnO2 composition coating was carried out by microplotter printing on a specialized substrate followed by heat treatment in air at 300°С for 1h. For the formed layer Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 nanocomposite chemosensor properties were comprehensively studied for a number of analyte gases: 100 ppm CO, NH3, NO2, benzene, acetone, ethanol, 1000 ppm H2, methane and 10% oxygen. Its high sensitivity and selectivity at operating temperatures of 150 and 200°С to nitrogen dioxide were shown: the responses to 100 ppm NO2 were 281 and 873%, respectively.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Е. Simonenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

A. Mokrushin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

I. Nagornov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

Yu. Gorban

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences; D.I. Mendeleev Russian University of Chemical Technology. D.I. Mendeleev Russian Chemical and Technological University

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991; Moscow, 125047

Т. Simonenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

N. Simonenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

N. Kuznetsov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ep_simonenko@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

Bibliografia

  1. Pang J., Mendes R.G., Bachmatiuk A. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019. V. 48. № 1. P. 72. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00324F
  2. Tang Q., Zhou Z. // Prog. Mater. Sci. 2013. V. 58. № 8. P. 1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.04.003
  3. Iqbal A., Sambyal P., Koo C.M. // Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020. V. 30. № 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000883
  4. VahidMohammadi A., Rosen J., Gogotsi Y. // Science. 2021. V. 372. № 6547. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf1581
  5. Lei J.-C., Zhang X., Zhou Z. // Front. Phys. 2015. V. 10. № 3. P. 276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-015-0493-x
  6. Hong Ng V.M., Huang H., Zhou K. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017. V. 5. № 7. P. 3039. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA06772G
  7. Zhan X., Si C., Zhou J. et al. // Nanoscale Horizons. 2020. V. 5. № 2. P. 235. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NH00571D
  8. Zhang X., Zhang Z., Zhou Z. // J. Energy Chem. 2018. V. 27. № 1. P. 73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2017.08.004
  9. Mashangva T.T., Goel A., Bagri U. et al. // Appl. Mater. Today. 2024. V. 38. P. 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2024.102163
  10. Deshmukh K., Kovářík T., Khadheer Pasha S.K. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 424. P. 213514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213514
  11. Venkateshalu S., Grace A.N. // Appl. Mater. Today. 2020. V. 18. P. 100509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100509
  12. Alwarappan S., Nesakumar N., Sun D. et al. // Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022. V. 205. P. 113943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113943
  13. Mehdi Aghaei S., Aasi A., Panchapakesan B. // ACS Omega. 2021. V. 6. № 4. P. 2450. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c05766
  14. Bhardwaj R., Hazra A. // J. Mater. Chem. С. 2021. V. 9. № 44. P. 15735. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC04085E
  15. Nahirniak S., Saruhan B. // Sensors. 2022. V. 22. № 3. P. 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030972
  16. Tran V.A., Tran N.T., Doan V.D. et al. // Micromachines. 2023. V. 14. № 2. P. 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020247
  17. Qin R., Shan G., Hu M. et al. // Mater. Today Phys. 2021. V. 21. P. 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100527
  18. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Mokrushin A.S. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2023. V. 13. № 5. P. 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050850
  19. Chourasia N.K., Rawat A., Chourasia R.K. et al. // Mater. Adv. 2023. V. 4. № 23. P. 5948. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3MA00631J
  20. Ta Q., Thakur D., Noh J.-S. // Chemosensors. 2023. V. 11. № 9. P. 477. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11090477
  21. Peng B., Huang X. // Front. Chem. 2022. V. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2022.1037732
  22. Naguib M., Kurtoglu M., Presser V. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2011. V. 23. № 37. P. 4248. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102306
  23. Wang S., Jiang Y., Liu B. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2021. V. 343. P. 130069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130069
  24. Pazniak H., Varezhnikov A.S., Kolosov D.A. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2021. V. 33. № 52. P. 2104878. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202104878
  25. Kumar A.N., Pal K. // Mater. Adv. 2022. V. 3. № 12. P. 5151. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00301e
  26. Rathi K., Arkoti N.K., Pal K. // Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2022. V. 9. № 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202200415
  27. Thomas T., Ramos Ramón J.A., Agarwal V. et al. // Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022. V. 336. P. 111872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.111872
  28. Okawa A., Yang M., Hasegawa T. et al. // Discov. Mater. 2023. V. 3. № 1. P. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-023-00048-4
  29. Wang P., Guo S., Zhao Y. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2024. V. 398. P. 134710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.134710
  30. Wang W., Yao Y., Xin J. et al. // Nanotechnology. 2024. V. 35. № 21. P. 215502. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ad2b4a
  31. Wu M., An Y., Yang R. et al. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021. V. 4. № 6. P. 6257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c01059
  32. Lee E., VahidMohammadi A., Yoon Y.S. et al. // ACS Sensors. 2019. V. 4. № 6. P. 1603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b00303
  33. Simonenko N.P., Glukhova O.E., Plugin I.A. et al. // Chemosensors. 2022. V. 11. № 1. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11010007
  34. Guo L., Han H., Li Y. et al. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2023. V. 123. № 1. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0156402
  35. Simonenko N.P., Glukhova O.E., Plugin I.A. et al. // Chemosensors. 2023. V. 11. № 7. P. 1.
  36. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Mokrushin A.S. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2023. V. 13. № 850. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13050850
  37. Wang X., Zhang D., Zhang H. et al. // Nano Energy. 2021. V. 88. P. 106242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106242
  38. Cai Y., Wang Y., Wen X. et al. // Anal. Chim. Acta. 2022. V. 1225. P. 340256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.340256
  39. Qiu J., Xia X., Hu Z. et al. // Nanotechnology. 2022. V. 33. № 6. P. 065501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ac33d3
  40. Ma J., Zhai H., Zhang Z. et al. // ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023. V. 6. № 21. P. 19797. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03615
  41. Lee S.H., Eom W., Shin H. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. № 9. P. 10434. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b21765
  42. Tran N.M., Ta Q.T.H., Noh J.-S. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021. V. 273. P. 125087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125087
  43. Zhang Y., Jiang Y., Duan Z. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2021. V. 344. № 2. P. 130150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130150
  44. Zhang Y., Li Y., Jiang Y. et al. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2024. V. 411. P. 135788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2024.135788
  45. Tian X., Yao L., Cui X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022. V. 10. № 10. P. 5505. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA10773A
  46. Le V.T., Vasseghian Y., Doan V.D. et al. // Chemosphere. 2022. V. 291. P. 133025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133025
  47. Phuong Doan T.H., Hong W.G., Noh J.-S. // RSC Adv. 2021. V. 11. № 13. P. 7492. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA10879K
  48. Chen W.Y., Sullivan C.D., Lai S.-N. et al. // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 7. № 33. P. 29195. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c03272
  49. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Averin A.A. et al. // Chemosensors. 2023. V. 11. № 2. P. 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11020142
  50. Majhi S.M., Ali A., Greish Y.E. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2023. V. 13. № 1. P. 3114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30002-6
  51. Zhang D., Yu S., Wang X. et al. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2022. V. 423. P. 127160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127160
  52. Simonenko E.P., Nagornov I.A., Mokrushin A.S. et al. // Micromachines. 2023. V. 14. № 4. P. 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14040725
  53. Wang C., Li R., Feng L. et al. // Chemosensors. 2022. V. 10. № 3. P. 109. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors10030109
  54. Wang J., Yang Y., Xia Y. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2022. V. 353. P. 131087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.131087
  55. Gasso S., Mahajan A. // ACS Sensors. 2022. V. 7. № 8. P. 2454. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.2c01213
  56. Симоненко Е.П., Мокрушин А.С., Нагорнов И.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2024. V. 69. № 4. В печати.
  57. Wang Z., Wang F., Hermawan A. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021. V. 73. P. 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.07.040
  58. Yao Y., Han Y., Zhou M. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022. V. 10. № 15. P. 8283. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA11018G
  59. Wu X., Gong Y., Yang B. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022. V. 581. P. 152364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152364
  60. Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P., Nagornov I.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 5. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622050187
  61. Simonenko E.P., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2019. V. 670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.004
  62. Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko E.P., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019. V. 463. P. 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.208
  63. Mokrushin A.S., Nagornov I.A., Simonenko Т. L. et al. // Mater. Sci. Eng., B. 2021. V. 271. P. 115233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115233
  64. Schreyer M., Guo L., Thirunahari S. et al. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2014. V. 47. № 2. P. 659. https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714003379
  65. Davey W.P. // Phys. Rev. 1925. V. 25. № 6. P. 753. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.25.753
  66. Seki H., Ishizawa N., Mizutani N. et al. // J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 1984. V. 92. № 1064. P. 219. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj1950.92.1064_219
  67. The crystal structures of three new vanadium oxide minerals. 1957. https://doi.org/10.3133/tei684

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Microstructure of the obtained multilayer MXene Ti0.2V1.8CTx according to TEM data

Baixar (205KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of the initial MAX phase Ti0.2V1.8AlC (1), the synthesized multilayer MAXene Ti0.2V1.8CTx (2) and the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–SnO2 composite material obtained by hydrothermal synthesis (3)

Baixar (174KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Microstructure of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–SnO2 composite nanomaterial according to TEM data; yellow arrows indicate the incorporation of SnO2 nanoparticles between the MXene layers, green arrows indicate their location on the surface of accordion-like aggregates

Baixar (125KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Microstructure of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–SnO2 coating after its oxidation at a temperature of 300°C and the formation of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 composition according to SEM data. The arrows indicate the aggregates of multilayer MXene in the composition of the materials.

Baixar (989KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Selectivity diagram of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 composite coating, composed of responses to various gases (100 ppm CO, NH3, NO2, C6H6, C3H6O, C2H5OH, 1000 ppm H2, CH4, 10% O2) at detection temperatures of 150 and 200С

Baixar (155KB)
Metadados
7. Fig. 6. Responses of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 composite coating to 4–100 ppm NO2 (a); dependence of the response on the NO2 concentration in the gas atmosphere (b); measurements were carried out at an operating temperature of 200C

Baixar (117KB)
Metadados
8. Fig. 7. Signal reproducibility of the Ti0.2V1.8CTx–V2O5–SnO2 composite coating when detecting 10 ppm NO2 at an operating temperature of 200°C

Baixar (82KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024