Research of the photocatalytic activity of nano-sized powder and fiber based on nickel-zinc ferrite

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Nano-sized powder and nanostructured fibers of nickel-zinc ferrite with the composition Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 were synthesized. By means of X-ray diffraction analysis, it was proven that the synthesized samples correspond to the nickel-zinc ferrite phase. Based on the data obtained, it was established that fibers based on nickel-zinc ferrite have a higher value of the crystal lattice parameter and crystallite size than the synthesized nano-sized powder. SEM data confirm that the samples under study consist of nanosized particles: 20–60 nm for powder and 20–40 nm for fibers. The optical diffuse reflection method was used to determine the band gap for Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 samples, which was 1.58 eV for fibers and 1.67 eV for powder. The photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under the action of Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 samples of various morphologies has been studied. It was determined that a sample of nanostructured Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 fibers has greater photocatalytic activity, since the degree of degradation of methylene blue was 26% for nanofibers and 18% for nanopowder.

Sobre autores

S. Ivanin

Kuban State University; Kuban State Agrarian University named after. I.T. Trubilina

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: ivanin18071993@mail.ru
Rússia, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

V. Buz’ko

Kuban State University; Kuban State Technological University

Email: ivanin18071993@mail.ru
Rússia, Krasnodar; Krasnodar

R. Yakupov

Kuban State University

Email: ivanin18071993@mail.ru
Rússia, Krasnodar

I. Suhno

Kuban State Agrarian University named after. I.T. Trubilina

Email: ivanin18071993@mail.ru
Rússia, Krasnodar

Bibliografia

  1. Silva E.D.N., Brasileiro I.L.O., Madeira V.S. et al. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020. V. 8. P. 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104132
  2. Dehghani F., Hashemian S., Shibani A. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017. V. 48. P. 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.022
  3. Šutka A., Gross A. // Sens. Actuators B. 2016. V. 222. P. 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.027
  4. Beyki M.H., Ganjbakhsh S.E., Minaeian S. et al. // Carbohydr. Polym. 2017. V. 15. P. 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.056
  5. Zhang W., Zhou P., Liu W. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2020. V. 315. P. 113682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113682
  6. Kumar R., Jasrotia R., Himanshi P. et al. // Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023. V. 157. P. 111355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111355
  7. Li Y., Li Y., Xu X. et al. // Chem. Geol. 2019. V. 504. P. 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.11.022
  8. Jadhav S.A., Somvanshi S.B., Khedkar M.V. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020. V. 31. P. 11352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-03684-1
  9. Jacinto M.J., Ferreira L.F., Silva V.C. // J. Sol. Gel Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 96. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-020-05333-9
  10. Manohar A., Chintagumpala K., Kim K.H. // Ceram. Int. 2021. V. 47. P. 7052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.11.056
  11. Rosales-Gonzalez O., Bolarín-Miro A.M., Cortes-Escobedo C.A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. V. 49. № 4. P. 6006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.101
  12. Reddy D.H.K., Yunang Y.-S. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 315. P. 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.01.012
  13. Hammad A.B.A., Hemdan B.A., Nahrawy A.M.E. // J. Environ. Manage. 2020. V. 270. P. 110816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110816
  14. Kefeni K.K., Mamba B.B. // Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2020. V. 23. P. e00140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2019.e00140
  15. Sharma S.S., Dutta V., Raizada P. // J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021. V. 9. P. 105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105812
  16. Susmita P., Amarjyoti C. // Appl. Nanosci. 2014. V. 4. P. 839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0264-3
  17. Estrada-Flores S., Martínez-Luévanos A., Perez-Berumen C.M. // Bol. Soc. Espan. Ceram. Vid. 2020. V. 59. № 5. P. 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2019.10.003
  18. Martinson K.D., Belyak V.E., Sakhno D.D. // Nanosystems: Phys., Chem., Math. 2021. V. 12. № 6. P. 792. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2021-12-6-792-798
  19. Liu Y., Li Z., Green M. // J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2017. V. 50. № 19. P. 193003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa6500
  20. Paromova А.А., Sinitsina А.А., Boitsova Т.B. et al. // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2023. V. 93. № 2. P. 345. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070363223020159
  21. Садовников А.А., Нечаев Е.Г., Бельтюков А.Н. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 4. С. 432. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X2104019X
  22. Lavand A.B., Bhatu M.N., Malghe Y.S. // J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018. V. 8. № 1. P. 299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.05.019
  23. Nabiyouni G., Ghanbari D., Ghasemi J. // J. Nano Struct. 2015. V. 5. № 3. P. 289. https://doi.org/ 10.7508/jns.2015.03.011
  24. Mohd Q., Khushnuma A., Braj R.S. et al. // Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 2015. V. 137. P. 1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.09.039.
  25. Shamray I.I., Buz’ko V.Yu., Goryachko A.I. // IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020. V. 969. P. 012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/969/1/012101
  26. Buz’ko V.Yu., Shamrai I.I., Ryabova M.Yu. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2021. V. 57. № 1. P. 38. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168521010027
  27. Yan L., Yue M., Shaofeng Z. et al. // Asian J. Chem. 2013. V. 25. № 10. P. 5781. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.OH89
  28. Ma W., Wang N., Yang L. // J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019. V. 30. P. 20432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-02382-x
  29. Nag S., Ghosh A., Das D. et al. // Synth. Met. 2020. V. 267. P. 116459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2020.116459
  30. Chehade W., Basma H.M., Abdallah A. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2022. V. 48. № 1. P. 1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.209
  31. Dhiman P., Rana G., Dawi E.A. et al. // Water. 2023. V. 15. P. 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15010187
  32. Liu R., Zhang Y., Li H. et al. // J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015. V. 15. № 6. P. 4574. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2015.9773
  33. Yang X., Wang Z., Jing M. et al. // Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2014. V. 225. P. 1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1819-3
  34. Martinson K.D., Sakhno D.D., Belyak V.E. et al. // Nanosystems: Phys., Chem., Math. 2020. V. 11. № 5. P. 595. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2020-11-5-595-600.
  35. Martinson K.D., Beliaeva A.D., Sakhno D.D. et al. // Water. 2022. V. 14. P. 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030454
  36. Vyzulin S.A., Kalikintseva D.A., Miroshnichenko E.L. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci: Phys. 2018. V. 82. № 11. P. 1451. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873818110242
  37. Vyzulin S.A., Kalikintseva D.A., Miroshnichenko E.L. et al. // Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci: Phys. 2018. V. 82. № 8. P. 943. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1062873818080439
  38. Kalikintseva D.A., Buz’ko V.Y., Vyzulin S.A. et al. // Izvest. Ross. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Fizich. 2021. V. 85. № 1. P. 112. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0367676521010142
  39. Surendran P., Lakshmanan A., Sakthy Priya S. et al. // Appl. Phys. A. 2020. V. 126. P. 257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-3435-6
  40. Якупов Р.П., Бузько В.Ю., Иванин С.Н., Панюшкин В.Т. Пат. RU 2802465 Cl. 29.08.2023.
  41. Makula P., Pacia M., Macyk W. // J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018. V. 9. P. 6814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024