Determination of Conditions for Selective Sorption of Silver(I) on Thiocarbamoylated Polyethylene

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Sorption properties of thiocarbamoylated polyethylene with respect to silver(I) from multicomponent solutions have been studied. It was found that the synthesized sorbent is characterized by a high sorption capacity and selectivity with respect to silver ions. In the static sorption mode, quantitative extraction is possible from solutions with a concentration of Ag(I) 1 · 10–4 mol/dm3 in the pH range from 1 to 7, with concomitant Ca(II), Mg(II), Cu(II), Fe(III), Zn(II), Cd(II), Ni(II), Mn(II), Co(II), Pb(II) have no effect on the degree of extraction of silver ions. The high selectivity of sorption is maintained under dynamic conditions in the presence of excessive amounts of base metal ions at pH 2. The total dynamic sorption capacity for silver is 0.35 mmol/g (solution transmission rate 2 cm3/min, pH 2, sorbent weight 0.1 g, C = 1 · 10–4 mol/dm3). The composition of the eluents providing the highest values of the degree of desorption of silver from the surface of the sorbent has been determined. It was found that during sorption using a sorbent after the sorption-desorption stage, its silver capacity decreases slightly.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

E. Melnik

UNIIM – Affiliated Branch of the D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology; Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU)

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ea-melnik@mail.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg, 620075; Yekaterinburg, 620002

Y. Petrova

UNIIM – Affiliated Branch of the D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology

Email: ea-melnik@mail.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg, 620075

L. Neudachina

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU)

Email: ea-melnik@mail.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg, 620002

A. Pestov

Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin (UrFU); I.Ya. Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ea-melnik@mail.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg, 620002; Yekaterinburg, 620137

V. Osipova

I.Ya. Postovsky Institute of Organic Synthesis of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ea-melnik@mail.ru
Ресей, Yekaterinburg, 620137

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Calisi А., Lorusso C., Gallego-Urrea J.A. et al. // Sci. Total Environ. 2022. V. 851. P. 158113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2022. 158113
  2. Sim W., Barnard R.T., Blaskovich M.A.T. et al. // Antibiotics. 2018. V. 7. № 4. P. 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics7040093
  3. Borah D., Das N., Sarmah P. et al. // Mater. Today Commun. 2023. V. 34. P. 105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105110
  4. Khatabi H., Bidoki S.M., Haji A. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2022. V. 290. P. 126548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126548
  5. Singh C., Anand S.K., Upadhyay R. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023. V. 297. P. 127413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127413
  6. Yu S., Yin Y., Liu J. // Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts. 2013. V. 15. P. 78. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EM30595J
  7. Morgan T.P., Wood C.M. // Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004. V. 23. № 5. Р. 1261. https://doi.org/10.1897/03-181
  8. Bilberg K., Malte H., Wang T. et al. // Aquat. Toxicol. 2010. V. 96. № 2. P. 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.10.019
  9. Botelho M.T., Passos M.J.A.R.C., Trevizani T.H. et al. // Mutat. Res., Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2022. V. 881. P. 503527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2022.503527
  10. Andreï J., Guérold F., Bouquerel J. et al. // Aquat. Toxicol. 2023. V. 256. P. 106421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2023.106421
  11. Xiang Q.Q., Kang Y.H., Lian L.H. et al. // Aquat. Toxicol. 2022. V. 252. P. 106318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2022.106318
  12. Yeo M.K., Kang M. // Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008. V. 29. № 6. P. 1179. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.6.1179
  13. Padhye L.P., Jasemizad T., Bolan S. et al. // Sci. Total Environ. 2023. V. 871. P. 161926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161926
  14. Islam M.A., Dada T.K., Parvin M.I. et al. // J. Water Process Engineer. 2022. V. 48. P. 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102935
  15. Петрова Ю.С., Алифханова Л.М.К., Кузнецова К.Я. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. № 7. С. 991.
  16. Корнейков Р.И. // Неорган. материалы. 2021. Т. 57. № 4. С. 437.
  17. Алифханова Л.М.К., Петрова Ю.С., Босенко С.Н. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 4. С. 540.
  18. Çelik Z., Gülfen M., Aydın A.O. // J. Hazard. Mater. 2010. V. 174. № 1–3. P. 556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.087
  19. Maleki H., Durães L., Portugal A. // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2014. V. 385. P. 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.10.017
  20. Ladhe A.R., Frailie P., Hua D. et al. // J. Membr. Sci. 2009. V. 326. № 2. P. 460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.10.025
  21. Herman P., Pércsi D., Fodor T. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2023. V. 387. P. 122598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122598
  22. Melnyk I.V., Vaclavikova M., Ivanicova L. et al. // Appl. Surface Sci. 2023. V. 609. P. 155253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155253
  23. Liu P., Wang X., Tian L., et al. // J. Water Process Engineer. 2020. V. 34. P. 101184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101184
  24. Losev V.N., Elsufiev E.V., Buyko O.V. et al. // Hydrometallurgy. 2018. V. 176. P. 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2018.01.016
  25. Thomas H.C. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1944. V. 66. № 10. P. 1466.
  26. Родионова А.П., Землякова Е.О., Корякова О.В. и др. // Известия АН. Сер. Химическая. 2019. № 6. С. 1248.
  27. Zhang L., Zhao Y., Mu C. et al. // Sustainable Chem. Pharm. 2020. V. 17. P. 100287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2020.100287
  28. Ghanei-Motlagh M., Fayazi M., Taher M.A. et al. // Chem. Eng. J. 2016. V. 290. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.025
  29. Akhond M., Absalan G., Sheikhian L. et al. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2006. V. 52. P. 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.014
  30. Yang T., Zhanga L., Zhong L. et al. // Hydrometallurgy. 2018. V. 175. P. 179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.11.007
  31. Safarpour M., Safikhani A., Vatanpour V. // Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021. V. 279. P. 119678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119678
  32. Мельник Е.А., Сысолятина А.А., Холмогорова А.С. и др. // Эталоны. Стандартные образцы. 2022. Т. 18(2). С. 57. https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-177-2022-18-2-57-71
  33. Kinnunen V., Perämäki S., Matilainen R. // Spectrochim. Acta. Part B. 2022. V. 193. P. 106431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2022.106431

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Supplement
Жүктеу (222KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 1. The effect of the acidity of the medium on the sorption of silver ions from a multicomponent system. 1 – C = = 1 × 10-4 mol/l, C = 4 × 10-4 mol/L; 2 – C = = 1 × 10-4 mol/L, C = 1 × 10-4 mol/l; msorbent = = 0.0100 g, d < 0.071 mm.

Жүктеу (67KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 2. Silver sorption isotherm(I) – and the results of its processing by mathematical models. C = 1 × × 10-4 mol/l; msorbent = 0.0100 g, d < 0.071 mm, pH 2.

Жүктеу (215KB)
Метадеректер
5. 3. Dynamic output curves of metal ion sorption on thiocarbamoylated polyethylene: msorbent = = 0.1000 g (1), 0.0500 g (2); 0.0100 g (3); C = 1 × 10-4 mol/l; C = 8 × 10-4 mol/l; 0.125 mm > d > 0.100 mm, the transmission rate of the model solution is 2 cm3/min, pH 2.

Жүктеу (171KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 4. Dependence of the degree of silver extraction(I) on the volume of the passed solution, sorbent = 0.1 g (a), 0.05 g (b). 1 – the first sorption cycle; 2 – the second sorption cycle; 3 – the third sorption cycle. C = 1 × 10-4 mol/l; C = 8 × × 10-4 mol/l; 0.125 mm > d > 0.100 mm, the transmission rate of the model solution is 2 cm3/min, pH 2.

Жүктеу (282KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024