Epoxide-Mediated Synthesis of Two-Component Al2O3–TiO2 Aerogels and Their UV-Protective Characteristics

L. A. Polevoi; Полевой Л. А.; I. V, Kolesnik; Колесник И. В.; G. P. Kopitsa; Копица Г. П.; M. V. Golikova; Голикова М. В.; N. V. Tsvigun; Цвигун Н. В.; T. V. Khamova; Хамова Т. В.; A. V. Sergeeva; Сергеева А. В.; Yu. E. Gorshkova; Горшкова Ю. Е.; D. A. Sandzhieva; Санджиева Д. А.; B. V. Ubushaeva; Убушаева Б. В.; A. E. Baranchikov; Баранчиков А. Е.; V. K. Ivanov; Иванов В. К.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23601505

Epoxide-Mediated Synthesis of Two-Component Al2O3–TiO2 Aerogels and Their UV-Protective Characteristics

Authors: Polevoi L.A.¹, Kolesnik I.V.², Kopitsa G.P.³^,4, Golikova M.V.¹, Tsvigun N.V.⁵, Khamova T.V.³, Sergeeva A.V.⁶, Gorshkova Y.E.⁷, Sandzhieva D.A.⁸^,9, Ubushaeva B.V.⁸^,9, Baranchikov A.E.¹, Ivanov V.K.¹^,2
Affiliations:
1. Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Moscow State University
3. Grebenshchikov Institute of Silicate Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
4. Konstantinov St. Petersburg Institute of Nuclear Physics, National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”
5. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography, Federal Research Center “Crystallography and Photonics”, Russian Academy of Sciences
6. Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, Far-Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
7. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
8. Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas (National Research University)
9. Topchiev Institute of Petrochemical Synthesis, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 12 (2023)
Pages: 1831-1848
Section: НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИЕ МАТЕРИАЛЫ И НАНОМАТЕРИАЛЫ
URL: https://kazanmedjournal.ru/0044-457X/article/view/666106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23601505
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XENVOW
ID: 666106

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

A new method was proposed to synthesize aerogels based on Al2O3–TiO2 by the hydrolysis of mixed solutions of titanium tetrachloride and aluminum nitrate in the presence of propylene oxide, followed by supercritical drying of the obtained gels. The aerogels are characterized by a high specific surface area (140–500 m2/g) and a high specific porosity (1.7–2.7 cm3/g). Heat treatment of the Al2O3–TiO2 aerogels at temperatures up to 600°C does not lead to crystallization of titanium dioxide, whereas the formation of crystalline anatase in aerogels based on individual TiO2 is observed already at a temperature of 450°C. Using the standardized ISO 24443-2016 method, the SPF value of the obtained materials was determined, which turned out to be comparable to the characteristics of a commercial inorganic UV filter based on TiO2 (Kronos 1171). At the same time, the photocatalytic activity of the Al2O3–TiO2 aerogels turned out to be more than 120 times lower than the similar characteristics of the commercial UV filter based on titanium dioxide. The results obtained demonstrated that the Al2O3–TiO2 aerogels are promising as components of sunscreens.

Keywords

titanium oxide, aluminum oxide, composites, aerogels

References

Jin S.-G., Padron F., Pfeifer G.P. // ACS Omega. 2022. V. 7. № 37. P. 32936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04424
Guerra K.C., Zafar N., Crane J.S. Skin Cancer Prevention // StatPearls. 2023. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing, 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 30137812/
Nohynek G.J., Schaefer H. // Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001. V. 33. № 3. P. 285. https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.2001.1476
Gonzalez H., Tarras-Wahlberg N., Strömdahl B. et al. // BMC Dermatol. 2007. V. 7. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-5945-7-1
Gabard B. Sunscreens // Cosmetics. Berlin: Springer, 1999. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59869-2_9
Bryden A.M., Moseley H., Ibbotson S.H. et al. // Br. J. Dermatol. 2006. V. 155. № 4. P. 737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07458.x
Victor F.C., Cohen D.E., Soter N.A. // J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2010. V. 62. № 4. P. 605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.084
Schneider S.L., Lim H.W. // Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2019. V. 35. № 6. P. 442. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12439
Serpone N., Dondi D., Albini A. // Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2007. V. 360. № 3. P. 794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2005.12.057
Morsella M., D’Alessandro N., Lanterna A.E. et al. // ACS Omega. 2016. V. 1. № 3. P. 464. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.6b00177
Nakata K., Fujishima A. // J. Photochem. Photobiol., C: Photochem. Rev. 2012. V. 13. № 3. P. 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001
Horie M., Sugino S., Kato H. et al. // Toxicol. Mech. Methods. 2016. V. 26. № 4. P. 284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2016.1175530
Sun S., Song P., Cui J. et al. // Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 9. № 16. P. 4198. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY01020C
Jang E., Sridharan K., Park Y.M. et al. // Chem. A Eur. J. 2016. V. 22. № 34. P. 12022. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201600815
Becker L.C., Boyer I., Bergfeld W.F. et al. // Int. J. Toxicol. 2016. V. 35. № 3. P. 16S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581816677948
Cassin G., Diridollou S., Flament F. et al. // Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2018. V. 40. № 1. P. 58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12433
Yorov K.E., Kolesnik I.V., Romanova I.P. et al. // J. Supercrit. Fluids. 2021. V. 169. P. 105099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2020.105099
Pierre A.C., Pajonk G.M. // Chem. Rev. 2002. V. 102. № 11. P. 4243. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0101306
Hüsing N., Schubert U. // Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998. V. 37. № 1–2. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980202)37:1/2<22::AID-ANIE22>3.0.CO;2-I
Feinle A., Elsaesser M.S., Hüsing N. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016. V. 45. № 12. P. 3377. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00710K
Yorov K.E., Baranchikov A.E., Kiskin M.A. et al. // Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2022. V. 48. № 2. P. 89. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070328422020014
Singh P., Nanda A. // Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2014. V. 36. № 3. P. 273. https://doi.org/10.1111/ics.12124
Chen L., Zhu J., Liu Y.-M. et al. // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2006. V. 255. № 1–2. P. 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2006.04.043
Moussaoui R., Elghniji K., ben Mosbah M. et al. // J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2017. V. 21. № 6. P. 751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2017.04.001
Donėlienė J., Fataraitė-Urbonienė E., Danchova N. et al. // Gels. 2022. V. 8. № 7. P. 422. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8070422
Gaweł B., Gaweł K., Øye G. // Materials. 2010. V. 3. № 4. P. 2815. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3042815
Lermontov S.A., Straumal E.A., Mazilkin A.A. et al. // Mater. Lett. 2017. V. 215. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.031
Yorov K.E., Sipyagina N.A., Malkova A.N. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2016. V. 52. № 2. P. 163. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168516020035
Yorov K.E., Sipyagina N.A., Baranchikov A.E. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016. V. 61. № 11. P. 1339. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023616110048
Baranchikov A.E., Kopitsa G.P., Yorov K.E. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 6. P. 874. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362106005X
Livage J., Henry M., Sanchez C. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 1988. V. 18. № 4. P. 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6786(88)90005-2
Gash A.E., Tillotson T.M., Satcher Jr J.H. et al. // J. Non. Cryst. Solids. 2001. V. 285. № 1–3. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00427-6
Itoh H., Tabata T., Kokitsu M. et al. // J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 1993. V. 101. № 1177. P. 1081. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj.101.1081
Wei T.-Y., Chen C.-H., Chang K.-H. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2009. V. 21. № 14. P. 3228. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9007365
Baumann T.F., Gash A.E., Chinn S.C. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2005. V. 17. № 2. P. 395. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm048800m
Straumal E.A., Ivanov V.K., Malkova A.N. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2017. V. 84. № 3. P. 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-017-4429-5
Lermontov S.A., Yurkova L.L., Straumal E.A. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018. V. 63. № 3. P. 303. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023618030142
Yorov K.E., Yapryntsev A.D., Baranchikov A.E. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 86. № 2. P. 400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-018-4647-5
Kameneva S.V., Yorov K.E., Kamilov R.K. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023. V. 107. P. 586.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-023-06149-z
Rouquerol J., Llewellyn P., Rouquerol F. // Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2007. V. 160. P. 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80008-5
Фиалков Ю.Я. Растворитель как средство управления химическим процессом. М., 1990.
Kuzin E.N., Krutchinina N.E. // Inorg. Mater. 2019. V. 55. № 8. P. 834. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168519080065
Wang T.-H., Navarrete-López A.M., Li S. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. A 2010. V. 114. № 28. P. 7561. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp102020h
Archambault J., Rivest R. // Can. J. Chem. 1958. V. 36. № 11. P. 1461. https://doi.org/10.1139/v58-216
Cottineau T., Richard-Plouet M., Rouet A. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2008. V. 20. № 4. P. 1421. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm702531q
Emons H.-H., Janneck E., Pollmer K. // Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1984. V. 511. № 4. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19845110415
Suzuki H., Ishiguro S.-I. // Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 1998. V. 54. № 5. P. 586. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108270197018817
Titanium(IV), Zirconium, Hafnium and Thorium // Hydrolys. Met. Ions. Weinheim: Wiley, 2016. P. 433. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527656189.ch10
Aluminium, Gallium, Indium and Thallium // Hydrolys. Met. Ions. Hydrolys. Met. Ions, Weinheim: Wiley, 2016. P. 757. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527656189.ch13
Gash A.E., Tillotson T.M., Satcher J.H. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2001. V. 13. № 3. P. 999. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0007611
Du X., Wang Y., Su X. et al. // Powder Technol. 2009. V. 192. № 1. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2008.11.008
Thommes M., Kaneko K., Neimark A.V. et al. // Pure Appl. Chem. 2015. V. 87. № 9–10. P. 1051. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117
Gao M., Liu B., Zhao P. et al. // J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2019. V. 91. № 3. P. 514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05057-5
Guinier A., Fournet G. Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1955. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1956.120199326
Teixeira J. Experimental Methods for Studying Fractal Aggregates // Growth Form. Dordrecht: Springer, 1986. P. 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5165-5_9
Kim D., Jung J., Ihm J. // Nanomaterials. 2018. V. 8. № 6. P. 375. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060375
Keysar S., De Hazan Y., Cohen Y. et al. // J. Mater. Res. 1997. V. 12. № 2. P. 430. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1997.0063
Meng F., Schlup J.R., Fan L.T. // Chem. Mater. 1997. V. 9. № 11. P. 2459. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm9700662
Chane-Ching J.-Y., Klein L.C // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1988. V. 71. № 1. P. 86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05765.x
Catauro M., Tranquillo E., Dal Poggetto G. et al. // Materials. 2018. V. 11. № 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122364
Diko M. // Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 2015. P. 149. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2015.0052
Feng G., Jiang F., Jiang W. et al. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. № 15. P. 18704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.096
Kirillova S.A., Almjashev V.I., Gusarov V. V. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011. V. 56. № 9. P. 1464. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023611090117
Dransfield G.P. // Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry. 2000. V. 91. № 1. P. 271. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033216
Kim M.G., Kang J.M., Lee J.E. et al. // ACS Omega. 2021. V. 6. № 16. P. 10668. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00043
Nishizawa H., Aoki Y. // J. Solid State Chem. 1985. V. 56. № 2. P. 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4596(85)90052-0
Bachina A.K., Almjasheva O.V., Popkov V.I. et al. // J. Cryst. Growth 2021. V. 576. P. 126371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2021.126371
Almjasheva O.V., Lomanova N.A., Popkov V.I. et al. // Nanosyst. Physics, Chem. Math. 2019. V. 10. № 4. P. 428. https://doi.org/10.17586/2220-8054-2019-10-4-428-437
Lin H., Li L., Zhao M. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012. V. 134. № 20. P. 8328. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3014049
Hammouda B. // J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2010. V. 43. № 4. P. 716. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889810015773
Schmidt P.W., Avnir D., Levy D. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 1991. V. 94. № 2. P. 1474. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460006
Pogorelov V., Doroshenko I., Pitsevich G. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2017. V. 235. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.037
Roscoe J.M., Abbatt J.P.D. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2005. V. 109. № 40. P. 9028. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp050766r
Thomas K., Hoggan P.E., Mariey L. et al. // Catal. Lett. 1997. V. 46. № 1/2. P. 77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019017123596
Hanaor D.A.H., Sorrell C.C. // J. Mater. Sci. 2011. V. 46. № 4. P. 855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-010-5113-0
Akkaya Arier U.O., Tepehan F.Z. // Compos. Part B Eng. 2014. V. 58. P. 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.023
Hanini F., Bouabellou A., Bouachiba Y. et al. // IOSR J. Eng. 2013. V. 3. № 11. P. 21. https://doi.org/10.9790/3021-031112128
Riaz S., Sajid-ur-Rehman, Abutalib M. et al. // J. Electron. Mater. 2016. V. 45. № 10. P. 5185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-4754-4
Filatova E.O., Konashuk A.S. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2015. V. 119. № 35. P. 20755. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b06843
Prange M.P., Zhang X., Ilton E.S. et al. // J. Chem. Phys. 2018. V. 149. № 2. P. 024502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037104
Tzompantzi F., Piña Y., Mantilla A. et al. // Catal. Today. 2014. V. 220–222. P. 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.027
Carp O., Huisman C.L., Reller A. // Prog. Solid State Chem. 2004. V. 32. № 1–2. P. 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001