Preparation of NASICON Na3Zr2Si2PO12 by Pyrolysis of Organic Solutions: Features of Phase Formation

D. N. Grishchenko; Грищенко Д. Н.; V. G. Kuryavyi; Курявый В. Г.; A. B. Podgorbunsky; Подгорбунский А. Б.; M. A. Medkov; Медков М. А.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X22601043

Preparation of NASICON Na3Zr2Si2PO12 by Pyrolysis of Organic Solutions: Features of Phase Formation

Authors: Grishchenko D.N.¹, Kuryavyi V.G.¹, Podgorbunsky A.B.¹, Medkov M.A.¹
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Chemistry, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 1 (2023)
Pages: 17-25
Section: СИНТЕЗ И СВОЙСТВА НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СОЕДИНЕНИЙ
URL: https://kazanmedjournal.ru/0044-457X/article/view/665319
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22601043
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GVETOJ
ID: 665319

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

A new promising method for the synthesis of NASICON (Na3Zr2Si2PO12) by pyrolysis of organic solutions has been developed. Sodium oleate, zirconyl oleate, tributyl phosphate, and tetraethoxysilane have been used as precursors. The molar ratios of the components of the mixture for the formation of NASICON have been established. The effect of sodium on the formation of the zirconium dioxide phase has been proven. A finely dispersed material with an average grain size of 0.2 µm has been obtained. Changes in morphology and composition depending on the time and temperature of firing the sample are studied. The results have been confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. To refine the parameters of the crystal lattice, a full-profile analysis has been performed by the Rietveld method. The process of obtaining NASICON takes about 9 h, i.e. it is the least time consuming of all the alternative ways of synthesis. The advantages of this method are the possibility of lowering the sintering temperature, the absence of the need to control many parameters during synthesis, and minimizing the duration and multi-stage process. The method contributes to the development and production of more promising ion-substituted structures.

Keywords

pyrolysis of organic solutions, NASICON, unit cell parameters, phase composition, solid electrolyte, ionic conductivity

References

Wang H., Zhao G., Wang S. et al. // Nanoscale. 2022. V. 14. № 3. P. 823. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1nr06959d
Rao Y.B., Bharathi K.K., Patro L.N. // Solid State Ionics. 2021. V. 366–377. P. 115671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2021.115671
Майоров П.А., Асабина Е.А., Петьков В.И. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2020. Т. 65. № 5. С. 660. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X2005013X
Kim H.J., Choi J.W., Kim S.D., Yoo K.S. // Mater. Sci. Forum. 2007. V. 544–545. P. 925. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.544-545.925
Tetsuya K., Miyachi Y., Shimanoe K., Yamazoe N. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2001. V. 80. № 1. P. 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-4005(01)00878-4
Paściak G., Mielcarek W., Prociów K., Warycha J. // Ceram. Int., Part. B. 2014. V. 40. № 8. P. 12783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.132
Jalalian-Khakshour A., Phillips Ch., Jackson L. et al. // J. Mater. Sci. 2020. V. 55. P. 2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04162-8
Naqash S., Sebold D., Tietz F., Guillon O. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019. V. 102. № 3. P. 1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.15988
Yang G., Zhai Y., Yao J. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2021. V. 57. P. 4023. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cc07261c
Zhang S., Quan B., Zhiyong Z., Zhao B. // Mater. Lett. 2004. V. 58. № 1. P. 226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00450-6
Porkodi P., Yegnaraman V., Kamaraj P. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2008. V. 20. № 20. P. 6410. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm800208k
Shimizu Y., Azuma Y., Michishita S. // J. Mater. Chem. 1997. V. 7. P. 1487.
Zhou M. // Sens. Actuators, B: Chem. 2007. V. 122. № 2. P. 419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2006.06.011
Ignaszak A., Pasierb P., Gajerski R., Komornicki S. // Thermochim. Acta. 2005. V. 426. № 1–2. P. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2004.07.002
Fuentes R.O., Figueiredo F., Soares M.R., Marques F.-M.B. // J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2005. V. 25. № 4. P. 455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.02.019
Fuentes R.O., Marques F.M.B., Franco J.I. // Bol. Soc. Esp. Cerám. Vidrio. 1999. V. 38. № 6. P. 631.
Fuentes R.O., Figueiredo F., Marques F.-M.B., Franco J.I. // Solid State Ionics. 2001. V. 139. № 3–4. P. 309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00683-X
Narayanan S., Reid S., Butler S., Thangadurai V. // Solid State Ionics. 2019. V. 331. P. 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2018.12.003
Naqash S., Ma Q., Tietz F., Guillon O. //Solid State Ionics. 2017. V. 302. P. 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2016.11.004
Oh J.A.S., He L., Plewa A. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019. V. 11. № 43. P. 40125. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b14986
Fuentes R.O., Figueiredo F.M., Marques F.M.B., Franco J.I. // Solid State Ionics. 2001. V. 140. № 1–2. P. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00701-9
Lee J.S., Chang C.M., Lee Y.I. et al. // J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004. V. 87. № 2. P. 305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2004.00305.x