<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Kazan medical journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kazan medical journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Казанский медицинский журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0368-4814</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-9359</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">696334</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/KMJ696334</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">MUQFMC</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Theoretical and clinical medicine</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Теоретическая и клиническая медицина</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Diagnostic value of inflammatory and renal tubular biomarkers in patients with cardiorenal syndrome: a cross-sectional study</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Диагностическое значение воспалительных и тубулярных почечных биомаркёров у пациентов с кардиоренальным синдромом: одномоментное исследование</trans-title></trans-title-group><trans-title-group xml:lang="zh"><trans-title>诊断炎症和肾小管损伤生物标志物在心肾综合征患者中的临床价值：一项横断面研究</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4041-6905</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Almammadov</surname><given-names>Fazil Ch.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Алмаммадов</surname><given-names>Фазил Чобан</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="AZ">Azerbaijan</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Depart. of Family Medicine</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук, каф. семейной медицины</p></bio><email>xeyalcafarov4@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5177-1634</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Jafarova</surname><given-names>Gulnara A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Джафарова</surname><given-names>Гюльнара Алыша</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="AZ">Azerbaijan</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Biology), senior research associate, Depart. of Biological Chemistry</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. биол. наук, старший научный сотрудник, каф. биологической химии</p></bio><email>gulcicekceferova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Azerbaijan Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Азербайджанский медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2026-03-28" publication-format="electronic"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-07" publication-format="electronic"><day>07</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>107</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">Kazan medical journal</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">Казанский медицинский журнал</issue-title><fpage>200</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-11-16"><day>16</day><month>11</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-01-26"><day>26</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="zh">Copyright ©; 2026,</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2029-04-07"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/696334">https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/696334</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>BACKGROUND: </bold>Early and accurate assessment of inflammatory and renal tubular biomarkers is clinically relevant to diagnose and evaluate progression of type 2 cardiorenal syndrome; however, their combined diagnostic value remains insufficiently studied.</p> <p><bold>AIM: </bold>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of inflammatory and renal tubular biomarkers in patients with type 2 cardiorenal syndrome.</p> <p><bold>METHODS: </bold>The study was conducted at the 1st Clinical Medical Center in Baku in 2020–2024 and included 200 patients with type 2 cardiorenal syndrome and 51 apparently healthy individuals. Patients were stratified by functional class of chronic heart failure based on the New York Heart Association classification and the stage of chronic kidney disease: group 1 (<italic>n</italic> = 74) with functional class I–II and stage I–II, respectively; group 2 (<italic>n</italic> = 9) with functional class I–II and stage III–IV, respectively; group 3 (<italic>n</italic> = 73) with functional class III–IV and stage I–II, respectively; group 4 (<italic>n</italic> = 44) with functional class III–IV and stage III–IV, respectively. The levels of cystatin C, lipocalin, liver-type fatty acid–binding protein, kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) in blood and urine, interleukin-6, interleukin-18, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were determined. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and correlations were evaluated using the Spearman correlation method.</p> <p><bold>RESULTS:</bold> In all groups, a pronounced increase in the studied markers compared with the control group was observed (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), with progressive elevation in line with disease severity. The levels of cystatin C, lipocalin, liver-type fatty acid–binding protein, and KIM-1 increased 2.9-, 2.1-, 3.1-, and 2.3/2.0-fold, respectively, in group 1 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001); 4.2-, 2.9-, 5.6-, and 5.1/2.7-fold in group 2 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001); 3.4-, 2.4-, 4.2-, and 2.6/2.3-fold in group 3 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001); and 6.4-, 3.4-, 7.2-, and 5.8/3.4-fold in group 4 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-18, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha also increased: 3.9- and 2.8-fold and by 89.0%, respectively, in group 1; 5.2-, 2.9-, and 2.5-fold in group 2; 4.4-, 4.0-, and 2.1-fold in group 3; and 6.4-, 5.2-, and 3.1-fold in group 4 (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Marker concentrations correlated with the stage of chronic kidney disease (ρ = 0.676–0.861; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and the functional class of chronic heart failure (ρ = 0.301–0.514; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), whereas lipocalin and KIM-1 correlated with interleukin-6 and interleukin-18 levels (ρ = 0.894–0.920; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). The highest diagnostic value was identified for liver-type fatty acid–binding protein (AUC: 0.819; 95% CI: 0.761–0.876; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), lipocalin (AUC: 0.768; 95% CI: 0.702–0.834; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and KIM-1 (AUC: 0.745; 95% CI: 0.678–0.813; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p> <p><bold>CONCLUSION:</bold> Inflammatory and renal tubular biomarkers have high diagnostic value and are consistent with the progression of cardiorenal dysfunction in type 2 cardiorenal syndrome.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование</bold>.<bold> </bold>Ранняя и точная оценка воспалительных и почечных тубулярных биомаркёров имеет важное клиническое значение для диагностики и оценки прогрессирования кардиоренального синдрома 2-го типа, однако их совместная диагностическая ценность изучена недостаточно.</p> <p><bold>Цель исследования</bold>.<bold> </bold>Оценить диагностическую значимость воспалительных и почечных тубулярных биомаркёров у пациентов с кардиоренальным синдромом 2-го типа.</p> <p><bold>Методы</bold>.<bold> </bold>В исследование, проведённое в 1-м Клиническом медицинском центре г. Баку в 2020–2024 гг., включены 200 пациентов с кардиоренальным синдромом 2-го типа и 51 практически здоровый человек. Пациенты распределены по функциональному классу хронической сердечной недостаточности согласно классификации Нью-Йоркской кардиологической ассоциации и стадии хронической болезни почек: 1-я группа (n=74) — функциональный класс I–II и стадии I–II; 2-я группа (n=9) — функциональный класс I–II и стадии III–IV; 3-я группа (n=73) — функциональный класс III–IV и стадии I–II; 4-я группа (n=44) — функциональный класс III–IV и стадии III–IV. Определяли уровни цистатина C, липокалина, белка, связывающего жирные кислоты печёночного типа, молекулы повреждения почек-1 (KIM-1; в крови и моче), IL-6, IL-18 и фактора некроза опухолей-α. Диагностическую точность оценивали методом ROC-анализа, корреляции — методом Спирмена.</p> <p><bold>Результаты</bold>.<bold> </bold>Во всех группах отмечено значимое повышение исследуемых маркёров по сравнению с контролем (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001) с нарастанием по мере тяжести заболевания. В 1-й группе уровни цистатина C, липокалина, белка, связывающего жирные кислоты печёночного типа, и KIM-1 увеличились соответственно в 2,9; 2,1; 3,1 и 2,3/2,0 раза (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001); во 2-й группе — в 4,2; 2,9; 5,6 и 5,1/2,7 раза (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001); в 3-й группе — в 3,4; 2,4; 4,2 и 2,6/2,3 раза (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001); в 4-й группе — в 6,4; 3,4; 7,2 и 5,8/3,4 раза (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001). Уровни IL-6, IL-18 и фактора некроза опухолей-α также возрастали: в 1-й группе — в 3,9; 2,8 раза и на 89,0%; во 2-й — 5,2 раза; 2,9 и 2,5 раза; в 3-й — 4,4; 4,0 и 2,1 раза; в 4-й — 6,4; 5,2 и 3,1 раза (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001). Концентрации маркёров коррелировали со стадией хронической болезни почек (ρ=0,676–0,861; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001) и функциональным классом хронической сердечной недостаточности (ρ=0,301–0,514; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001), а липокалин и KIM-1 — с IL-6 и IL-18 (ρ=0,894–0,920; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001). Наибольшая диагностическая ценность выявлена для белка, связывающего жирные кислоты печёночного типа (AUC 0,819; 95% ДИ 0,761–0,876; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001), липокалина (AUC 0,768; 95% ДИ 0,702–0,834; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001) и KIM-1 (AUC 0,745; 95% ДИ 0,678–0,813; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0,001).</p> <p><bold>Заключение</bold>.<bold> </bold>Воспалительные и почечные тубулярные биомаркёры обладают высокой диагностической значимостью и отражают прогрессирование сердечно-почечной дисфункции при кардиоренальном синдроме 2-го типа.</p></trans-abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="zh"><p><bold>论证</bold>：早期及准确评估炎症和肾小管损伤生物标志物，对 2 型心肾综合征的诊断及其进展评估具有重要的临床意义。然而，目前关于这些生物标志物联合诊断价值的相关研究尚不充分。</p> <p><bold>目的</bold>：本研究旨在评估炎症和肾小管损伤生物标志物在 2 型心肾综合征患者中的诊断价值。</p> <p><bold>方法</bold>：本研究为一项横断面研究，纳入了 2020 年至 2024 年间在巴库市第一临床医学中心诊治的 200 例 2 型心肾综合征患者，并选取 51 例健康体检者作为对照组。患者根据美国纽约心脏病协会 (NYHA) 心功能分级及慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 分期进行分组：第 1 组 (<italic>n</italic>=74)：NYHA I-II 级且 CKD I-II 期；第 2 组 (<italic>n</italic>=9)：NYHA I-II 级且 CKD III-IV 期；第 3 组 (<italic>n</italic>=73)：NYHA III-IV 级且 CKD I-II 期；第 4 组 (<italic>n</italic>=44)：NYHA III-IV 级且 CKD III-IV 期。检测指标包括：血清及尿液中的胱抑素 C、中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白 (NGAL)、肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白 (L-FABP)、肾损伤分子-1 (KIM-1)，以及炎症因子白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、白细胞介素-18 (IL-18) 和肿瘤坏死因子-α (TNF-α)。采用 ROC 曲线评估诊断效能，采用 Spearman 相关分析评估变量间的相关性。</p> <p><bold>结果</bold>：与对照组相比，各组患者各项指标水平均显著升高 (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)，且随疾病严重程度的增加呈上升趋势。第 1、2、3 和 4 组中，胱抑素 C、NGAL、L-FABP 及 KIM-1（血清/尿液）水平较对照组分别升高 2.9、2.1、3.1 和 2.3/2.0 倍（第 1 组）；4.2、2.9、5.6 和 5.1/2.7 倍（第 2 组）；3.4、2.4、4.2 和 2.6/2.3 倍（第 3 组）；6.4、3.4、7.2 和 5.8/3.4 倍（第 4 组）(均 <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)。炎症因子 IL-6、IL-18 和 TNF-α 水平亦呈现增高趋势：第 1 组分别升高 3.9 倍、2.8 倍及 89.0%；第 2 组分别升高 5.2 倍、2.9 倍及 2.5 倍；第 3 组分别升高 4.4 倍、4.0 倍及 2.1 倍；第 4 组分别升高 6.4 倍、5.2 倍及 3.1 倍 (均 <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)。各检测指标与慢性肾脏病分期呈正相关 (ρ=0.676~0.861, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)，与慢性心力衰竭心功能分级亦呈正相关 (ρ=0.301~0.514, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)；NGAL 及 KIM-1 与 IL-6 和 IL-18 呈显著正相关 (ρ=0.894~0.920, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)。ROC 曲线分析显示，L-FABP (AUC 0.819, 95% CI 0.761~0.876, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001)、NGAL (AUC 0.768, 95% CI 0.702~0.834, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001) 及 KIM-1 (AUC 0.745, 95% CI 0.678~0.813, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001) 具有较高的诊断价值。</p> <p><bold>结论</bold>：综上所述，炎症及肾小管损伤生物标志物具有较高的临床诊断价值，能够有效反映 2 型心肾综合征患者心肾功能障碍的进展情况。</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cardiorenal syndrome</kwd><kwd>neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin</kwd><kwd>kidney injury molecule-1</kwd><kwd>liver-type fatty acid–binding protein</kwd><kwd>cystatin C</kwd><kwd>interleukin-6</kwd><kwd>interleukin-18</kwd><kwd>tumor necrosis factor-alpha</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>кардиоренальный синдром</kwd><kwd>липокалин, ассоциированный с желатиназой нейтрофилов</kwd><kwd>молекула повреждения почек-1</kwd><kwd>белок, связывающий жирные кислоты печёночного типа</kwd><kwd>цистатин С</kwd><kwd>интерлейкин-6</kwd><kwd>интерлейкин-18</kwd><kwd>фактор некроза опухолей-α</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="zh"><kwd>心肾综合征</kwd><kwd>中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白</kwd><kwd>肾损伤分子-1</kwd><kwd>肝型脂肪酸结合蛋白</kwd><kwd>胱抑素 C</kwd><kwd>白细胞介素-6</kwd><kwd>白细胞介素-18</kwd><kwd>肿瘤坏死因子-α</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Reznik EV, Nikitin IG. Cardiorenal syndrome in patients with chronic heart failure as a stage of the cardiorenal continuum (part I): definition, classification, pathogenesis, diagnosis, epidemiology. The Russian Archives of Internal Medicine. 2019;9(1):5–22. doi: 10.20514/2226-6704-2019-9-1-5-22 EDN: WEOQBU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Tsibul’kin NA, Novozhilova AA, Khakimova DM. Cardiorenal syndrome: pathogenesis, clinical picture. Kazan medical journal. 2016;97(2):274–278. doi: 10.17750/KMJ2016-274 EDN: VRCQPX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Medvedeva EA, Shilyaeva NV, Iskhakov EN, Schukin YuV. Cardiorenal syndrome in chronic heart failure: pathogenesis, diagnostics, prognosis and opportunities for treatment. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2017;(1):136–141. doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2017-1-136-141 EDN: XRMCRD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Mitsas AC, Elzawawi M, Mavrogeni S, et al. Heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome: a narrative review on pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic regimens-from a cardiologist's view. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):7041. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237041 EDN: RTXGFQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Gallo G, Lanza O, Savoia C. New insight in cardiorenal syndrome: from biomarkers to therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(6):5089. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065089 EDN: HWUXJC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Ferdinand KC, Norris KC, Rodbard HW, Trujillo JM. Humanistic and economic burden of patients with cardiorenal metabolic conditions: a systematic review. Diabetes Ther. 2023;14(12):1–18. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01464-8 EDN: BXTHTO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bouquegneau A, Krzesinski JM, Delanaye P, Cavalier E. Biomarkers and physiopathology in the cardiorenal syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;443:100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.10.041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Goffredo G, Barone R, Di Terlizzi V, et al. Biomarkers in Cardiorenal Syndrome. J Clin Med. 2021;10(15):3433. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153433 EDN: DCBBYX</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Rahimova RR, Dashdamirova GS, Shahverdiyeva IJ, Karimova IA. Studying the activity of matrix metalloproteinases and antibodies to DNA in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis. Kazan medical journal. 2023;104(6):851–858. doi: 10.17816/KMJ624114 EDN: TWDYCU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Benoit SW, Ciccia EA, Devarajan P. Cystatin C as a biomarker of chronic kidney disease: latest developments. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020;20(10):1019–1026. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1768849 EDN: HVFTZA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Dundar A, Irmak H, Ayhanci T, Cetik Yildiz S. Evaluation of serum levels of kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as potential biomarkers of renal tubular damage in brucellosis patients. Int J Gen Med. 2025;18:5039–5046. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S544766 EDN: SNZGCN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Xu Y, Xie Y, Shao X, et al. L-FABP: a novel biomarker of kidney disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;445:85–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.03.017</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Delalić Đ, Brežni T, Prkačin I. Diagnostic value and utility of commonly used biomarkers of cardiac and renal function in cardiorenal syndromes: a narrative review. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2023;33(3):030502.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Kumar A, Chidambaram V, Geetha HS, et al. Renal Biomarkers in Heart Failure: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JACC Adv. 2024;3(2):100765. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100765 EDN: CFOVQQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Xu C, Lin S, Mao L, Li Z. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as predictor of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med. 2022;9:859318. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.859318</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Romejko K, Markowska M, Niemczyk S. The review of current knowledge on neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10470. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310470 EDN: LJRZBY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Sunayama T, Yatsu S, Matsue Y, et al. Urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein as a prognostic marker in patients with acute heart failure. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(1):442–449. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13730 EDN: COLCPW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Sircuta AF, Grosu ID, Schiller A, et al. The relationship between circulating kidney injury molecule-1 and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Biomedicines. 2024;12(8):1903. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12081903 EDN: QCDITM</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Marchiori GN, Defagó MD, Baraquet ML, et al. Interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein for optimal immunometabolic profiling of the lifestyle-related cardiorenal risk. Diagnosis. 2024;11(1):82–90. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0159 EDN: VMOUPU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Dri E, Lampas E, Lazaros G, et al. Inflammatory mediators of endothelial dysfunction. Life. 2023;13(6):1420. doi: 10.3390/life13061420 EDN: URKLUZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Vasquez F, Tiscornia C, Lorca-Ponce E, et al. Cardiorenal syndrome: molecular pathways linking cardiovascular dysfunction and chronic kidney disease progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(15):7440. doi: 10.3390/ijms26157440 EDN: YEDNTC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Virzì GM, Breglia A, Brocca A, et al. Levels of proinflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and tissue damage markers in patients with acute heart failure with and without cardiorenal syndrome type 1. Cardiorenal Med. 2018;8(4):321–331. doi: 10.1159/000492602</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Katkenov N, Mukhatayev Z, Kozhakhmetov S, et al. Systematic review on the role of IL-6 and IL-1β in cardiovascular diseases. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024;11(7):206. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11070206 EDN: YREJZD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Papamichail A, Kourek C, Briasoulis A, et al. Targeting key inflammatory mechanisms underlying heart failure: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;25(1):510. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010510 EDN: TTAWPR</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Gupta L, Thomas J, Ravichandran R, et al. Inflammation in cardiovascular disease: a comprehensive review of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e45483. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45483 EDN: QZYWAF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Mitsis A, Sokratous S, Karmioti G, et al. The Role of C-Reactive Protein in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unmasking Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Insights. J Clin Med. 2025;14:4795. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134795 EDN: NYMFVK</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Gupta A, Sontakke T, Acharya S, Kumar S. A comprehensive review of biomarkers for chronic kidney disease in older individuals: current perspectives and future directions. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e70262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70262 EDN: MXONYZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Mitsides N, Mitra V, Saha A, et al. Urinary liver-type fatty acid binding protein, a biomarker for disease progression, dialysis and overall mortality in chronic kidney disease. J Pers Med. 2023;13(10):1481. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101481 EDN: QZLAZS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Satta E, Strollo F, Borgia L, et al. Urinary L-FABP: a novel biomarker for evaluating diabetic nephropathy onset and progression-a narrative review. Diabetes Ther. 2025;16:1107–1124. doi: 10.1007/s13300-025-01731-w EDN: JMIDHG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Dutta A, Saha S, Bahl A, et al. A comprehensive review of acute cardiorenal syndrome: need for novel biomarkers. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1152055. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1152055 EDN: ILZNDI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Aletras G, Bachlitzanaki M, Stratinaki M, et al. Integrating novel biomarkers into clinical practice: a practical framework for diagnosis and management of cardiorenal syndrome. Life. 2025;15(10):1540. doi: 10.3390/life15101540 EDN: RUXIWD</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
