<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Kazan medical journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kazan medical journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Казанский медицинский журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0368-4814</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-9359</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">690052</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/KMJ690052</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">PNKGNV</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Early endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in combination treatment of acute pancreatitis of various etiologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Раннее эндоскопическое стентирование панкреатического протока в комплексном лечении пациентов с острым панкреатитом различной этиологии: систематический обзор и метаанализ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6171-9885</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5655-5223</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Samartsev</surname><given-names>Vladimir A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Самарцев</surname><given-names>Владимир Аркадьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д-р мед. наук, профессор</p></bio><email>savarcev-v@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-0613</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">1826-9662</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Parshakov</surname><given-names>Aleksandr A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Паршаков</surname><given-names>Александр Андреевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>parshakov@live.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5046-6130</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">2815-6374</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Pushkarev</surname><given-names>Boris S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пушкарев</surname><given-names>Борис Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>канд. мед. наук</p></bio><email>boris.pushkarev.08@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1922-9547</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">7653-0912</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Domrachev</surname><given-names>Andrei A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Домрачев</surname><given-names>Андрей Алексеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>atals999@icloud.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0983-5955</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">9652-7276</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Golovikhin</surname><given-names>Ivan A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Головихин</surname><given-names>Иван Андреевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>gia2004ivan@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Academician Ye.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Пермский государственный медицинский университет им. акад. Е.А. Вагнера</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="preprint" iso-8601-date="2026-01-14" publication-format="electronic"><day>14</day><month>01</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-08" publication-format="electronic"><day>08</day><month>02</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>107</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>116</fpage><lpage>127</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-09-03"><day>03</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2025-10-09"><day>09</day><month>10</month><year>2025</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2026, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2026, Эко-Вектор</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Эко-Вектор</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2029-02-08"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/690052">https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/690052</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Acute pancreatitis is a critical emergency in contemporary abdominal surgery. Moderate and severe pancreatitis demonstrate the greatest management difficulties, with mortality rates reaching 50%–80% when complications develop. A promising treatment method is early endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting. However, there is currently no consensus on the efficacy and safety of this method, particularly in acute non-biliary pancreatitis. AIM: To analyze and summarize published data from on the efficacy and safety of early endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in the combination therapy of patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis. A systematic review of publications was conducted across the Russian Science Citation Index, Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The search had no lower time limit, and its endpoint (upper limit) was set for June 1, 2025. The identified publications enabled traditional and Bayesian meta-analyses comparing treatment outcomes for patients who underwent endoscopic stenting as part of combination therapy and those whose management did not include this intervention. The inclusion criteria were retrospective and prospective comparative studies, diagnosed acute pancreatitis, and intervention time of up to 72 hours from disease onset. The endpoints included the incidence of infected pancreatic necrosis, organ dysfunction, pancreatic pseudocysts, and mortality rate. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. The heterogeneity of studies was assessed using Cochran’s Q test, I<sup>2</sup>, and τ<sup>2</sup>. The risk of publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots. If asymmetry was detected, correction was applied using the trim-and-fill method. A separate analysis of the acute biliary pancreatitis subgroup was conducted. The meta-analysis included 13 studies reporting the treatment outcomes for 1798 patients. Regardless of the etiology of acute pancreatitis, patients who underwent pancreatic duct stenting showed a lower incidence of organ dysfunction, pancreatic pseudocysts, and mortality. Moreover, in the acute biliary pancreatitis subgroup, a decreased risk of infected pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic pseudocysts was reported after pancreatic duct stenting. Thus, the meta-analysis revealed that early endoscopic stenting of the pancreatic duct is an effective option for combination therapy for patients with moderate to severe acute pancreatitis. However, the non-randomized design and high risk of systematic errors in the included studies indicate that the reported results are preliminary and require confirmation in multicenter randomized controlled studies.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Проблема острого панкреатита остаётся одной из наиболее актуальных в современной абдоминальной хирургии. Наибольшие сложности в лечении вызывает панкреатит средней и тяжёлой степени тяжести: летальность при развитии осложнений может достигать 50–80%. Перспективным методом лечения является раннее эндоскопическое стентирование панкреатического протока. Однако в настоящее время отсутствует единый консенсус относительно эффективности и безопасности этого метода, особенно при небилиарных формах острого панкреатита. Целью исследования является<bold> </bold>анализ и обобщение имеющихся в литературе данных об эффективности и безопасности раннего эндоскопического стентирования панкреатического протока в комплексном лечении пациентов со среднетяжёлым и тяжёлым острым панкреатитом различной этиологии. Нами выполнен систематический обзор публикаций, входящих в следующие базы данных: Российский индекс научного цитирования, Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane. Поиск не имел ограничений по нижней временной границе, а его окончание (верхняя граница) было установлено на 1 июня 2025 г. На основании найденных публикаций проведены классический и байесовский метаанализы результатов лечения пациентов, которым в составе комплексного лечения выполнялось эндоскопическое стентирование, и пациентов, лечение которых не включало данного вмешательства. Критерии включения: ретроспективные и проспективные сравнительные исследования, подтверждённый диагноз «острый панкреатит», сроки вмешательства — до 72 ч от начала заболевания. В качестве конечных точек оценивали частоту развития инфицированного панкреонекроза, органной дисфункции, псевдокист поджелудочной железы и летальности. Метаанализ выполнен с использованием модели со случайными эффектами. Гетерогенность исследований оценена с помощью Q-теста, показателей I<sup>2</sup> и τ<sup>2</sup>. Риск публикационных смещений оценён посредством воронкообразных диаграмм; при выявлении асимметрии применяли коррекцию методом Trim and Fill. Отдельно выполнен анализ подгруппы пациентов с острым билиарным панкреатитом. В метаанализ включено 13 исследований, содержащих результаты лечения 1798 пациентов. Независимо от этиологической формы острого панкреатита отмечено снижение частоты развития органной дисфункции, образования псевдокист поджелудочной железы и летальности у пациентов после стентирования панкреатического протока. В подгруппе острого билиарного панкреатита также зафиксировано снижение риска развития инфицированного панкреонекроза и псевдокист поджелудочной железы после стентирования панкреатического протока.<bold> </bold>Таким образом,<bold> </bold>проведённый метаанализ позволяет предположить, что раннее эндоскопическое стентирование панкреатического протока у пациентов со среднетяжёлым и тяжёлым острым панкреатитом различной этиологии может быть эффективным методом комплексного лечения. Однако ввиду нерандомизированного дизайна включённых исследований и высокого риска систематических ошибок полученные результаты носят предварительный характер и требуют подтверждения в рамках многоцентровых рандомизированных контролируемых исследований.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>acute pancreatitis</kwd><kwd>acute biliary pancreatitis</kwd><kwd>pancreatic duct stenting</kwd><kwd>complications</kwd><kwd>meta-analysis</kwd><kwd>Bayesian meta-analysis</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>острый панкреатит</kwd><kwd>острый билиарный панкреатит</kwd><kwd>стентирование панкреатического протока</kwd><kwd>осложнения</kwd><kwd>метаанализ</kwd><kwd>байесовский метаанализ</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Cianci P, Restini E. Management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis: Endoscopic and surgical approaches. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(28):4536–4554. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i28.4536 EDN: VBCEKG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Iannuzzi JP, King JA, Leong JH, et al. Global Incidence of Acute Pancreatitis Is Increasing Over Time: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(1):122–134. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.043 EDN: VVFMJH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Zilio MB, Eyff TF, Azeredo-Da-Silva ALF, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the aetiology of acute pancreatitis. HPB. 2019;21(3):259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.08.003 EDN: SXXWHD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis — 2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–111. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779 EDN: YQUVVJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Singh A, Bush N, Bhullar FA, et al. Pancreatic duct pressure: A review of technical aspects and clinical significance. Pancreatology. 2023;23(7):858–867. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.09.141 EDN: IYNPKQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Testoni PA, Testoni S. Endoscopic Management of Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. J Clin Med. 2025;14(7):2150. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072150 EDN: CGAURJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Dubravcsik Z, Hritz I, Fejes R, et al. Early ERCP and biliary sphincterotomy with or without small-caliber pancreatic stent insertion in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis: better overall outcome with adequate pancreatic drainage. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):729–736. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.660702 EDN: PHTCUV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Xiong R, Xiong D, Wu Z, Xiao X. Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of early endoscopic treatment of Acute biliary pancreatitis based on lightweight deep learning model. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024;24(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03361-1 EDN: KIKWGT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Bugiantella W, Rondelli F, Boni M, et al. Necrotizing pancreatitis: A review of the interventions. Int J Surg. 2016;28:S163–S171. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.038 EDN: CPHTVY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Yao W, Wang Z, Yang Y, et al. Treatment of acute pancreatitis with early pancreatic stenting: a case series of 336 patients. Gland Surg. 2021;10(9):2780–2789. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-574 EDN: TVSEBA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Peng B, Wang Z, Zhao C, et al. A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of pancreatic duct stent implantation in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis requiring ERCP. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01557-x EDN: HGHPJO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Hisai H, Sakurai T, Seki R, et al. The safety and efficacy of pancreatic duct stent placement in the emergency ERCP of acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016;83(5):AB271–AB272. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, London NJ, et al. Controlled trial of urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy versus conservative treatment for acute pancreatitis due to gallstones. Lancet. 1988;2(8618):979–983. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90740-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Fan ST, Lai EC, Mok FP, et al. Early treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis by endoscopic papillotomy. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(4):228–232. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280402</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Acosta JM, Katkhouda N, Debian KA, et al. Early ductal decompression versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis with ampullary obstruction: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2006;243(1):33–40. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000194086.22580.92</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Petrov MS, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MGH, et al. Early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management in acute biliary pancreatitis without cholangitis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):250–257. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815edddd EDN: LKZJKJ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Dubravcsik Z, Hritz I, Keczer B, et al. Network meta-analysis of prophylactic pancreatic stents and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of moderate-to-severe post-ERCP pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2021;21(4):704–713. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.006 EDN: WVQSJU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Arabpour E, Azarboo A, Pouladi A, et al. A network meta-analysis of optimal strategies for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):13702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98969-y EDN: PBCWCA</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley &amp; Sons; 2019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Röver C, Friede T. Using the bayesmeta R package for Bayesian random-effects meta-regression. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023;229:107303. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107303 EDN: DCLMVZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Fejes R, Kurucsai G, Szekely A, et al. Feasibility and safety of emergency ERCP and small-caliber pancreatic stenting as a bridging procedure in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis but difficult sphincterotomy. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(8):1878–1885. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0864-x EDN: NATEHB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Lee JK, Jang DK, Kang HW, Lee SH. Feasibility of Temporary Pancreatic Stenting after Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Acute Biliary Pancreatitis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2017;70(5):247–252. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2017.70.5.247</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Korolkov AYu, Smirnov AA, Popov DN, et al. Surgical treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis. Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery. 2021;180(1):40–44. doi: 10.24884/0042-4625-2021-180-1-40-44 EDN: MGINLQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Yao W, Wang G, Wang Q, et al. Stenting of the pancreatic duct in the early phase of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022;22(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02494-5 EDN: NACHRQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Dibirov MD, Khachatryan NN, Erin SA, et al. Results of 300 pancreatic duct stenting in acute pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020;(11):86–92. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202011186 EDN: QNECXQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Malkov IS, Zainutdinov AM, Khamzin II, et al. Improvement of acute destructive pancreatitis management. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021;(4):34–38. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202104134 EDN: TWDZJH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Mozharovsky VV, Mutnykh AG, Zhukov IN, Mozharovsky KV. Pancreatic duct stenting in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2019;9:13–17. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201909113 EDN: VISNZW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Chen L, Wang N, Yao W, et al. Efficacy analysis of pancreatic duct stenting in treating severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02250-3 EDN: WIQFWO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Chengsi Z, Weijie Y, Anning C, Zuozheng W. Treatment of hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis by pancreatic duct stenting: a retrospective study. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(9):3793–3795. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2482377/v1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Lopushkov AV, Turovets MI, Popov AS, et al. The influence of early endoscopic transpapillary interventions on the risk of infection of pancreatic necrosis. Endoscopic Surgery. 2024;30(1):12–19. doi: 10.17116/endoskop20243001112 EDN: QAMFAV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Novikov SV, Rogal ML, Yartsev PA, Teterin YuS. Pancreatic duct stenting in acute severe pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2022;(6):18–26. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202206118 EDN: JCBGDG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Ding G, Qin M, Cai W, et al. The safety and utility of pancreatic duct stents in the emergency ERCP of acute biliary pancreatitis but difficult sphincterotomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(120):2374–2376. doi: 10.5754/hge12363</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>McCarthy J, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ. Preliminary experience with endoscopic stent placement in benign pancreatic diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34(1):16–18. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71222-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Huibregtse K, Schneider B, Vrij AA, Tytgat GN. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(88)71221-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Kozarek RA, Patterson DJ, Ball TJ, Traverso LW. Endoscopic placement of pancreatic stents and drains in the management of pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 1989;209(3):261–266. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198903000-00002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Buriev IM, Grashchenko SA, Zhuravleva LV, et al. Pancreatic stenting in the prevention and combination therapy of acute pancreatitis. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2022;27(2):65–72. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2022-2-65-72 EDN: ONOJWI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Shapovalianz SG, Fedorov ED, Budzinskiy SA, Kotieva AY. Main Pancreatic Duct Stenting for Acute Pancreatitis Induced by Endoscopic Transpapillar Procedures. Annals of HPB Surgery. 2014;19(1):17–27. EDN: RYZMAV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Ekstrem AV, Lopushkov AV, Turovets MI. Early stenting of the main pancreatic duct and the risk of systemic complications of alcohol-alimentary necrosis pancreatitis. Modern problems of science and education. 2024;(2):4. doi: 10.17513/spno.33299 EDN: KSQLMG</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Dubravcsik Z, Madacsy L, Gyokeres T, et al. Preventive pancreatic stents in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis (PREPAST trial): pre-study protocol for a multicenter, prospective, randomized, interventional, controlled trial. Pancreatology. 2015;15(2):115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.02.007 EDN: UPHZCZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Karjula H, Nordblad Schmidt P, Mäkelä J, et al. Prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting in severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy. 2019;51(11):1027–1034. doi: 10.1055/a-0865-1960</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>James TW, Crockett SD. Management of acute pancreatitis in the first 72 hours. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018;34(5):330–335. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000456</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Aleksandrova IV, Il'inskiy ME, Rey SI, et al. Early progressive organ failure in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2013;(9):29–33. EDN: RBMTLT</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
