<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Kazan medical journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kazan medical journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Казанский медицинский журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0368-4814</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-9359</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">2091</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/KMJ2091</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Theoretical and clinical medicine</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Теоретическая и клиническая медицина</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Comparative analysis of echocardiography, multispiral computed tomography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in left ventricular mass evaluation</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Сравнительный анализ данных эхокардиографии, мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии и перфузионной сцинтиграфии миокарда в оценке массы миокарда левого желудочка</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Galyavich</surname><given-names>A S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Галявич</surname><given-names>Альберт Сарварович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rafikov</surname><given-names>A Y</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рафиков</surname><given-names>Алексей Юрьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>alex_raf@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Saifullina</surname><given-names>G B</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сайфуллина</surname><given-names>Гузель Бариевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Казанский государственный медицинский университет</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Interregional Clinical and Diagnostic Center, Kazan, Russia</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Межрегиональный клинико-диагностический центр, г. Казань</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2012-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2012</year></pub-date><volume>93</volume><issue>6</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 93, NO6 (2012)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 93, №6 (2012)</issue-title><fpage>855</fpage><lpage>858</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2016-03-28"><day>28</day><month>03</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2012, Galyavich A.S., Rafikov A.Y., Saifullina G.B.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2012, Галявич А.С., Рафиков А.Ю., Сайфуллина Г.Б.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2012</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Galyavich A.S., Rafikov A.Y., Saifullina G.B.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Галявич А.С., Рафиков А.Ю., Сайфуллина Г.Б.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/2091">https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/2091</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim. To perform a comparative analysis of multispiral computed tomography, echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the evaluation of left ventricular mass. Methods. The study included 44 patients (15 female, 29 male) aged of 21 to 73 years (mean age was 55±11 years). Left ventricular mass was assessed by noninvasive multispiral computed tomography coronary angiography using the 64-slice «Aquillon 64» (Toshiba, Japan) scanner. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed on the «Vivid-7» (GE, USA) ultrasound system. Scintigraphic analysis of left ventricular mass was performed on the single-detector gamma camera «Millenium-MPR» (GE, USA) using the «4-D MSPECT» (University of Michigan Medical Center) software. Results. A comparative analysis of left ventricular mass showed that the differences in median values were statistically significant between all the methods presented. The differences in left ventricular mass calculated using the Bland-Altman method were as follows: between multispiral computed tomography and echocardiography -32±41 gr, between multispiral computed tomography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy «4-D MSPECT» 34±48 gr. Conclusion. Multispiral computed tomography, echocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy assess left ventricular mass differently, with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy giving the lowest and echocardiography giving the highest mass. Results gained at multispiral computed tomography lies in between the myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Цель. Проведение сравнительного анализа данных мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии, эхокардиографии и перфузионной сцинтиграфии миокарда в оценке массы миокарда левого желудочка. Методы. Обследованы 44 человека в возрасте от 21 до 73 лет, средний возраст составил 55±11 лет (15 женщин и 29 мужчин). Томографический анализ массы миокарда левого желудочка проводили в ходе неинвазивной мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии-коронарографии. Исследование осуществляли на 64-спиральном компьютерном томографе «Aquillon 64» (Toshiba, Япония). Эхокардиографическое обследование пациентов проводили на аппарате «Vivid-7» (GE, США). Сцинтиграфические исследования были выполнены на однодетекторной гамма-камере «Millenium-MPR» (GE, США). Сцинтиграфический анализ массы левого желудочка проводили с помощью программы «4-D MSPECT» (Университета мичиганского медицинского центра). Результаты. При сравнительном анализе различия медиан значений массы миокарда левого желудочка были статистически значимы между всеми представленными методами. По методу Бленда-Альтмана различия методов в оценке массы миокарда левого желудочка составили: между данными мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии и эхокардиографии -32±41 г, между данными мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии и перфузионной сцинтиграфии миокарда «4D MSPECT» 34±48 г. Вывод. Мультиспиральная компьютерная томография, эхокардиография и перфузионная сцинтиграфия миокарда предоставляют разные данные о массе миокарда левого желудочка: минимальный показатель массы миокарда получен при перфузионной сцинтиграфии миокарда, максимальный - при эхокардиографии, промежуточные значения - при мультиспиральной компьютерной томографии.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>64-slice multispiral computed tomography</kwd><kwd>coronary angiography</kwd><kwd>echocardiography</kwd><kwd>scintigraphy</kwd><kwd>left ventricular myocardial mass</kwd><kwd>left ventricular hypertrophy</kwd><kwd>coronary heart disease</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>мультиспиральная компьютерная томография</kwd><kwd>коронарография</kwd><kwd>эхокардиография</kwd><kwd>сцинтиграфия</kwd><kwd>масса миокарда левого желудочка</kwd><kwd>гипертрофия левого желудочка сердца</kwd><kwd>ишемическая болезнь сердца</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Bavelaar-Croon C., Kayser H., van der Wall E. et al. Left ventricular function: correlation of quantitative gated SPECT and MR imaging over a wide range of values // Radiology. - 2000. - Vol. 217. - P. 572-575.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Brindis R., Douglas P., Hendel R. et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI) // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2005. - Vol. 46. - P. 1587-1605.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Dewey M., Müller M., Eddicks S. et al. Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography comparison with magnetic resonance imaging // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2006. - Vol. 48. - P. 2034-2044.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Drazner M., Rame E., Marino E.K. et al. Increased left ventricular mass is a risk factor for the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within five years. The Cardiovascular Health Study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2004. - Vol. 43. - P. 2207-2215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Faber T.L., Cooke C.D., Folks R.D. et al. Left ventricular function and perfusion from gated SPECT perfusion images: an integrated method // J. Nucl. Med. - 1999. - Vol. 40, N 4. - P. 650-659.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Gottdiener J., Arnold A., Aurigemma G. Predictors of congestive heart failure in the elderly: the cardiovascular health study // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. - 2000. - Vol. 35. - P. 1628-1637.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Gupta S., Berry J., Ayers C.R. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy, aortic wall thickness, and lifetime predicted risk of cardiovascular disease. The Dallas Heart Study // Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img. - 2010. - Vol. 3. - P. 605-613.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Lang R.M., Bierig M., Devereux R. et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. - 2005. - Vol. 18. - P. 1440-1463.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Mahnken A., Koos R., Katoh M. et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction // Eur. Radiol. - 2005. - Vol. 15. - P. 714-720.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Salm L.P., Schuijf J.D., de Roos A. et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. - 2006. - Vol. 7. - P. 308-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Stolzmann P., Scheffel H., Trindade P. et al. Left ventricular and left atrial dimensions and volumes comparison between dual-source CT and echocardiography // Invest. Radiol. - 2008. - Vol. 43, N 5. - P. 284-289.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Yamamuro M., Tadamura E., Kubo S. et al. Cardiac functional analysis with multi-detector row CT and segmental reconstruction algorithm: comparison with echocardiography, SPECT, and MR imaging // Radiology. - 2005. - Vol. 234. - P. 381-390.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
