<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Kazan medical journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Kazan medical journal</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Казанский медицинский журнал</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">0368-4814</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2587-9359</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">11537</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/KMJ2019-264</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Review Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Current views on the possibility of cervical insufficiency correction</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Современные представления о возможности коррекции истмико-цервикальной недостаточности</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Yakovleva</surname><given-names>O V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Яковлева</surname><given-names>Ольга Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>jkovlevaov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Glukhova</surname><given-names>T N</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Глухова</surname><given-names>Татьяна Николаевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>jkovlevaov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Rogozhina</surname><given-names>I E</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рогожина</surname><given-names>Ирина Евгеньевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email>jkovlevaov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Saratov State Medical University n.a. V.I. Razumovskiy</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Саратовский государственный медицинский университет им. В.И. Разумовского</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-03-29" publication-format="electronic"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 100, NO2 (2019)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 100, №2 (2019)</issue-title><fpage>264</fpage><lpage>269</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-03-29"><day>29</day><month>03</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N., Rogozhina I.E.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Яковлева О.В., Глухова Т.Н., Рогожина И.Е.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N., Rogozhina I.E.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Яковлева О.В., Глухова Т.Н., Рогожина И.Е.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/11537">https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/11537</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The main role in spontaneous abortion in 2nd and 3d trimesters is assigned to cervical insufficiency. According to a number of researchers, bed rest, elevated lower limbs, restriction of physical activity, tocolysis, antibacterial therapy do not affect the prolongation of pregnancy and are ineffective for preventing premature spontaneous labor. Correction of cervical insufficiency can be carried out by a vaginal form of progesterone, cerclage, pessary. The use of vaginal progesterone is justified in women with recurrent miscarriage, a history of premature birth, and shortening of the cervix to less than 25 mm. Indications for surgical correction are limited to patients with habitual loss of pregnancy due to cervical weakness or a history of premature birth. In the absence of significant obstetric history, cerclage has no advantages over the use of progesterone. The optimal time for cerclage is up to 20 weeks of pregnancy. Unlike progesterone cerclage has complications, the frequency and severity of which are attributable to the timing and indications for correction. Transabdominal cerclage is performed only when there is a technical impossibility of vaginal access due to the absence of a vaginal part of the cervix or after unsuccessful attempts of vaginal cerclages. Most often, the use of a pessary is associated with the diagnosis of a short cervix in terms of more than 24 weeks of gestation in the absence of an aggravated history. The combined use of gestagens, pessary and cerclage does not increase the efficiency of carrying a singleton pregnancy. Methods for the prevention of preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy, such as the introduction of a specialized outpatient service, bed rest, antibacterial therapy, progesterone, preventive cerclage or the insertion of a pessary do not change the incidence and mortality of newborns.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Основную роль в самопроизвольном прерывании беременности во II-III триместрах отводят истмико-цервикальной недостаточности. По данным ряда исследователей, постельный режим, приподнятый тазовый конец, ограничение физической деятельности, токолиз, антибактериальная терапия не влияют на пролонгирование беременности и неэффективны для профилактики преждевременных самопроизвольных родов. Истмико-цервикальную недостаточности можно скорректировать с помощью вагинальной формы прогестерона, серкляжа, пессария. Применение вагинальной формы прогестерона оправдано у женщин с привычным невынашиванием беременности, преждевременными родами в анамнезе и укорочением шейки матки до &lt;25 мм. Показания к хирургической коррекции ограничены пациентками с привычной потерей беременности ввиду несостоятельности шейки матки или с преждевременными родами в анамнезе. При отсутствии отягощённого акушерского анамнеза серкляж не имеет преимуществ перед применением прогестерона. Оптимальные сроки серкляжа - до 20-й недели беременности. В отличие от прогестерона серкляж может сопровождаться осложнениями, частота и тяжесть которых обусловлены сроками и показаниями для коррекции. Трансабдоминальный серкляж выполняют только при технической невозможности влагалищного доступа ввиду отсутствия влагалищной части шейки матки или после безуспешных попыток влагалищных серкляжей. Чаще всего применение пессария связано с диагностикой короткой шейки матки на сроках более 24 нед гестации при отсутствии отягощённого анамнеза. Сочетанное применение гестагенов, пессария и серкляжа не повышает эффективность вынашивания одноплодной беременности. Методы профилактики преждевременных родов при многоплодии, такие как введение специализированной амбулаторной службы, назначение постельного режима, антибактериальной терапии, прогестерона, профилактического серкляжа или наложение пессария, не изменяют показатели заболеваемости и смертности новорождённых.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>progestogen</kwd><kwd>cerclage</kwd><kwd>obstetric pessary</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>истмико-цервикальная недостаточность</kwd><kwd>прогестерон</kwd><kwd>серкляж</kwd><kwd>акушерский пессарий</kwd><kwd>сervical insufficiency</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Blencowe H., Cousens S., Chou D. et al. Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births. Reprod. Health. 2013; 10 (1): S2. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Delnord M., Blondel B., Zeitlin J. What contributes to disparities in the preterm birth rate in European countries? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 27 (2): 133–142. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Delnord M., Blondel B., Zeitlin J. What contributes to disparities in the preterm birth rate in European countries? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 27 (2): 133-142. DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000156.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romero R., Yeo L., Miranda J. et al. A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix. J. Perinatal. Med. 2013; 41 (1): 27–44. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0272.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Romero R., Yeo L., Miranda J. et al. A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix. J. Perinatal. Med. 2013; 41 (1): 27-44. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2012-0272.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yorifuji T., Makino S., Yamamoto Y. et al. Effectiveness of delayed absorbable monofilament suture in emergency cerclage. Taiwanese J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 53 (3): 382–384. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4049792.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yorifuji T., Makino S., Yamamoto Y. et al. Effectiveness of delayed absorbable monofilament suture in emergency cerclage. Taiwanese J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 53 (3): 382-384. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4049792.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">American College of Obstetricians and Gyneco­logists. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123 (2): 372–379. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123 (2): 372-379. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Romero R., Conde-Agudelo A., El-Refaie W. et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 49 (3): 303–314. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17397.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Romero R., Conde-Agudelo A., El-Refaie W. et al. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth and neonatal morbidity and mortality in women with a twin gestation and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis of individual patient data. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 49 (3): 303-314. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17397.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Conde-Agudelo A., Romero R., Da Fonseca E. et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 219 (1): 10–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Conde-Agudelo A., Romero R., Da Fonseca E. et al. Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 219 (1): 10-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Dodd J.M., Grivell R.M., Brien C.M. et al. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017; 10: CD012024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Vaginal micronized progesterone capsules for the prevention of miscarriage and preterm birth: a review of the clinical evidence. 2014; 28. https://www.cadth.ca/vaginal-micronized-progesterone-capsules-prevention-mis</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Vaginal micronized progesterone capsules for the prevention of miscarriage and preterm birth: a review of the clinical evidence. 2014; 28. https://www.cadth.ca/vaginal-micronized-progesterone-capsules-prevention-mis carriage-and-preterm-birth-review-clinical (access date: 09.12.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">carriage-and-preterm-birth-review-clinical (access date: 09.12.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Preterm labour and birth. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2015; 20: 24. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25/doc uments/preterm-labour-and-birth-appendices-a-g2 (access date: 09.12.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Preterm labour and birth. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). 2015; 20: 24. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25/doc</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Norman J.E., Marlow N., Messow C. et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2016; 387: 2106-2116. DOI: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(16)00350-0.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">uments/preterm-labour-and-birth-appendices-a-g2 (access date: 09.12.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">El-refaie W., Abdelhafez M.S., Badawy A. Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm labor in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with sonographic short cervix: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016; 293 (1): 61-67. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3767-1.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Norman J.E., Marlow N., Messow C. et al. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the ­OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind ­trial. Lancet. 2016; 387: 2106–2116. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dodd J.M., Grivell R.M., Obrien C.M. et al. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 10: CD012024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">6736(16)00350-0.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pustotina O. Effectiveness of dydrogesterone, 17-OH progesterone and micronized progesterone in prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2018; 31 (14)6 1830-1838. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330406.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">El-refaie W., Abdelhafez M.S., Badawy A. Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm labor in asymptomatic twin pregnancies with sonographic short cervix: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016; 293 (1): 61–67. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3767-1.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eleje G.U., Ikechebelu J.I., Ahizechukwu C.E. et al. Cervical cerclage in combination with other treatments for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 11. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012871.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dodd J.M., Grivell R.M., Obrien C.M. et al. Prenatal administration of progestogens for preventing spontaneous preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 10: CD012024. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012024.pub2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alfirevic Z., Stampalija T., Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 6. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pustotina O. Effectiveness of dydrogesterone, ­17-OH progesterone and micronized progesterone in prevention of preterm birth in women with a short cervix. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2018; 31 (14)6 1830–1838. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330406.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simonazzi G., Curti A., Bisulli M. et al. Cervical lacerations in planned versus labor cerclage removal: a systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015; 193: 19-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.032.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eleje G.U., Ikechebelu J.I., Ahizechukwu C.E. et al. Cervical cerclage in combination with other treatments for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancies. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 11. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012871.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sato Y., Hidaka N., Nakano T. et al. Efficacy of an emergency cervical cerclage using absorbable monofilament sutures. J. Pregnancy. 2018; 4049792: 5. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4049792.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alfirevic Z., Stampalija T., Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2017; 6. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Neveu M.E., Fernandez H., Deffieux X. et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 218: 21-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simonazzi G., Curti A., Bisulli M. et al. Cervical lacerations in planned versus labor cerclage removal: a systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015; 193: 19–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.032.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown R., Gagnon R., Delisle M.F. et al. Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013; 35 (12): 1115-1127. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30764-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sato Y., Hidaka N., Nakano T. et al. Efficacy of an emergency cervical cerclage using absorbable monofilament sutures. J. Pregnancy. 2018; 4049792: 5. DOI: 10.1155/2018/4049792.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anon. ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 142. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123 (2, Pt. 1): 372-379. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Neveu M.E., Fernandez H., Deffieux X. et al. Fertility and pregnancy outcomes after transvaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2017; 218: 21–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.09.007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berghella V., Ciardulli A., Rust O.A. et al. Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50: 569-577. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17457.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown R., Gagnon R., Delisle M.F. et al. Cervical insufficiency and cervical cerclage. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013; 35 (12): 1115–1127. DOI: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30764-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kindinger L.M., Kyrgiou M., MacIntyre D.A. et al. Preterm birth prevention post-conization: a model of cervical length screening with targeted cerclage. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (11): е0163793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anon. ACOG. Practice Bulletin No. 142. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 123 (2, Pt. 1): 372–379. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Marcellin L. Prevention of preterm birth by uterine cervical cerclage. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2016; 45 (10): 1299-1323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.022.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berghella V., Ciardulli A., Rust O.A. et al. Cerclage for sonographic short cervix in singleton gestations without prior spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using individual patient-level data. Ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 50: 569–577. DOI: 10.1002/uog.17457.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Auber M., Hamou L., Roman H. et al. Transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage: 13 cases at Rouen University Hospital. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2012; 40 (12): 741-745. DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.07.036.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kindinger L.M., Kyrgiou M., MacIntyre D.A. et al. Preterm birth prevention post-conization: a model of cervical length screening with targeted cerclage. PLoS One. 2016; 11 (11): е0163793. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163793.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Huras H., Kalinka J., Dębski R. Short cervix in twin pregnancies: current state of knowledge and the proposed scheme of treatment. Ginekol. Pol. 2017; 88 (11): 626-632. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0112.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marcellin L. Prevention of preterm birth by uterine cervical cerclage. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris). 2016; 45 (10): 1299–1323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.022.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hita M.M., Paniza L.R., Durán S.R. Pessary cervical and prevention preterm birth based on literature review. Int. J. Pregn. Chi. Birth. 2018; 4 (4): 188-193. DOI: 10.15406/ipcb.2018.04.00108.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Auber M., Hamou L., Roman H. et al. Transabdo­minal cervico-isthmic cerclage: 13 cases at Rouen University Hospital. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2012; 40 (12): ­741–745. DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2011.07.036.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Falcao V., Melo C., Matias A. et al. Cervical pessary for the prevention of preterm birth: is it of any use? J. Perinatal. Med. 2016; 45 (1): 21-27. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0076.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Huras H., Kalinka J., Dębski R. Short cervix in twin pregnancies: current state of knowledge and the proposed scheme of treatment. Ginekol. Pol. 2017; 88 (11): 626–632. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saccone G., Maruotti G.M., Giudicepietro A. et al. Effect of cervical pessary on spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and short cervical length: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 318 (23): 2317-2324. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.18956.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hita M.M., Paniza L.R., Durán S.R. Pessary cervical and prevention preterm birth based on literature review. Int. J. Pregn. Chi. Birth. 2018; 4 (4): 188‒193. DOI: 10.15406/ipcb.2018.04.00108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saccone G., Ciardulli A., Xodo S. et al. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with short cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2017; 30 (24): 2918-2925. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1268595.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Falcao V., Melo C., Matias A. et al. Cervical pessary for the prevention of preterm birth: is it of any use? J. Perinatal. Med. 2016; 45 (1): 21–27. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0076.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2014; 15. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guid ance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/Multifetal-Pregnancy-Reduction (access date: 01.12.2018).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saccone G., Maruotti G.M., Giudicepietro A. et al. Effect of cervical pessary on spontaneous preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies and short cervical length: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017; 318 (23): 2317–2324. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.18956.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dodd J.M., Dowswell T., Crowther C.A. Specialised antenatal clinics for women with a multiple pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD00 5300.pub4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saccone G., Ciardulli A., Xodo S. et al. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in twin pregnancies with short cervical length: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Matern. Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2017; 30 (24): 2918–2925. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1268595.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zimerman A., Maymon R., Viner Y. et al. Prevention of preterm birth in twins with short mid-trimester cervical length less than 25 mm - combined treatment with arabin's cerclage pessary and intravaginal micronized progesterone compared with conservative treatment. Harefuah. 2018; 157 (5): 301-304. PMID: 29804334.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">American College of Obstetricians and Gyneco­logists (ACOG). Multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Washington (DC): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). 2014; 15. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guid</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fox N.S., Gupta S., Lam-Rachlin J. et al. Cervical Pessary and vaginal progesterone in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 127 (4): 625-630. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001300.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">ance-and-Publications/Committee-Opinions/­Committee-on-Ethics/Multifetal-Pregnancy-Reduction (access date: 01.12.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jarde A., Lewis-Mikhael A.M., Dodd J.M. et al. The more, the better? Combining interventions to prevent preterm birth in women at risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2017; 39 (12): 1192-1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.007.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Dodd J.M., Dowswell T., Crowther C.A. Specia­lised antenatal clinics for women with a multiple ­pregnancy for improving maternal and infant outcomes. Cochrane Database of Syst. Rev. 2015. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005300.pub4.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Zimerman A., Maymon R., Viner Y. et al. Prevention of preterm birth in twins with short mid-trimester cervical length less than 25 mm — combined treatment with arabin's cerclage pessary and intravaginal micronized progesterone compared with conservative treatment. Harefuah. 2018; 157 (5): 301–304. PMID: 29804334. 34. Fox N.S., Gupta S., Lam-Rachlin J. et al. Cervical Pessary and vaginal progesterone in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 127 (4): 625–630. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Jarde A., Lewis-Mikhael A.M., Dodd J.M. et al. The more, the better? Combining interventions to prevent preterm birth in women at risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2017; 39 (12): 1192–1202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.07.007.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
