Multidisciplinary Approach to the Treatment of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: A Case–Control Study
- Authors: Kutepov D.E.1,2, Fedorova A.A.2,3, Pasechnik I.N.2, Glukhova S.I.4
-
Affiliations:
- Clinical hospital No. 1
- Central State Medical Academy
- Clinical Sanatorium “Barvikha”
- Scientific Institution V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
- Section: Original research
- Submitted: 11.07.2025
- Accepted: 12.12.2025
- Published: 27.01.2026
- URL: https://kazanmedjournal.ru/kazanmedj/article/view/687278
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/KMJ687278
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KSPZJG
- ID: 687278
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft tissue infection represents a massive soft tissue lesion accompanied by sepsis.
AIM: This work aimed to identify predictors of adverse outcome in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infection treated in the intensive care unit.
METHODS: Among 89 patients with sepsis of various etiologies treated in the intensive care unit, 12 patients (6 men and 6 women) with necrotizing soft tissue infection were selected. The patients were divided into two groups according to clinical outcome: group 1 (n = 8) consisted of discharged patients; group 2 (n = 4) included patients with fatal outcome. The obtained data were subjected to statistical analysis. The significance of intergroup differences was assessed using nonparametric statistical methods (Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson’s χ2 test). Differences were considered statistically significant at p = 0.05–0.01.
RESULTS: All patients included in the study demonstrated clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis (septic shock). Group 1 demonstrated a significant reduction in inflammatory markers by day 3 of intensive care during intensive therapy including extracorporeal detoxification techniques: C-reactive protein decreased from 296.5 (Me 282.7–361.7) to 66.5 (Me 62.7–105.5) mg/L (p = 0.011), and procalcitonin decreased from 14.66 (Me 1.94–33.20) to 2.81 (Me 0.89–6.03) ng/mL (p = 0.027), along with regression of organ dysfunction. Group 2 showed no positive clinical trends: vasopressor support remained necessary, and levels of inflammatory markers (procalcitonin and C-reactive protein) exceeded baseline values. By day 3 of intensive care, no significant changes in C-reactive protein or procalcitonin levels were detected (p = 0.179). Limb amputations were performed in four patients: in one patient in group 1 and in three patients in group 2.
CONCLUSION: Predictors of adverse outcome in necrotizing soft tissue infection include limb amputation due to persistent inflammatory process, sustained requirement for vasopressor support, and absence of positive trends in procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels.
About the authors
Dmitri E. Kutepov
Clinical hospital No. 1; Central State Medical Academy
Email: kutepovde@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7236-6288
SPIN-code: 6310-0172
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Head, depart. of extracorporeal methods of treatment, Professor, Depart. of anesthesiology and reanimatology
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowAnna A. Fedorova
Central State Medical Academy; Clinical Sanatorium “Barvikha”
Author for correspondence.
Email: annyfed@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4556-8375
SPIN-code: 9950-4903
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Head, ultrasound depart., Assistant Professor,
Depart. of radiology
Igor N. Pasechnik
Central State Medical Academy
Email: pasigor@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8121-4160
SPIN-code: 4433-1418
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Head, Depart. of anesthesiology and reanimatology
Russian Federation, MoscowSvetlana I. Glukhova
Scientific Institution V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Email: sveglukhova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4285-0869
SPIN-code: 3151-2282
Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), senior research associate
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Sklizkov DS, Shlyapnikov SA, Batyrshin IM, et al. Necrotizing soft tissue infections. Diagnosis, classification, and modern approaches to treatment (literature review). Infection in surgery. 2020;18(3–4):52–58. (In Russ.) EDN: LVEBXV
- Cui Z, Lu S, Bai Y, et al. Necrotizing soft tissue infection: clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and management of 32 cases in Beijing. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(5):03000605211018442. doi: 10.1177/03000605211018442
- Huang KF, Hung MH, Lin YS, et al. Independent predictors of mortality for necrotizing fasciitis: a retrospective analysis in a single institution. J Trauma. 2011;71(2):467–473. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318220d7fa
- Ogica A, Burdelski C, Rohde H, et al. Necrotizing soft tissue infections in intensive care. J Intensive Care Med. 2022;37(3):393–400. doi: 10.1177/08850666211010127 EDN: GHQPWL
- Nawijn F, Hietbrink F, Peitzman AB, Leenen LPH. Necrotizing soft tissue infections, the challenge remains. Front Surg. 2021;8:721214. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.721214 EDN: VBWQTQ
- Myopathies in Clinician's Practice: A Guide for Physicians. Pasechnik IN, Burns SA, Boyarintseva VV, editors. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2023. 448 p. (In Russ.)
- Sukovatykh BS, Blinkov YuYu, Zaitsev IA, et al. Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Management: a Clinical Case Study. Journal of experimental and clinical surgery. 2024;17(2):78–83. doi: 10.18499/2070-478X-2024-17-2-78-83 EDN: IITUYB
- Pasechnik IN, Ryabov AL, Vershinina MG. Sepsis and diabetes mellitus: state of the issue. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2016;(1):80–84. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2016180-84 EDN: VOATUF
- Bonne SL, Kadri SS. Evaluation and management of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Infect Dis Clin. 2017;31(3):497–511. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.05.011 EDN: YHOKWY
- Park HG, Yang JH, Park BH, Yi HS. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a retrospective review of predictive factors for limb loss. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022;14(2):297. doi: 10.4055/cios19166 EDN: YQASDE
- Larichev AB. Again about sepsis: philosophy of dialectical unity of definition and clinical practice. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2015;(10):84–87. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20151084-87 EDN: VKGSWR
- Bagnenko SF, Gorobets ES, Gusarov VG, et al. Clinical guidelines sepsis (in adults). Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2025;22(1):81–109. doi: 10.24884/2078-5658-2025-22-1-81-109 EDN: TXBXUW
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287 EDN: EVYMIC
Supplementary files

