Razlichnye podkhody k opredeleniyu lingvisticheskoy vezhlivosti

Abstract


The article gives a brief overview of various concepts of linguistic politeness, and discusses the dependence of this category on the type of culture.

About the authors

G R Vlasyan

References

  1. Демьянков В.З. Тайна диалога // Диалог: Теоретические проблемы и методы исследования. М., 1992.
  2. Карасик В.И. Язык социального статуса. М., 2002.
  3. Ларина Т.В. Категория вежливости и стиль коммуникации: сопоставление английских и русских лингвокультурных традиций. М., 2009.
  4. Словарь по этике / Под ред. И.С.Кона. М., 1983.
  5. Формановская Н.И. Речевое взаимодействие: коммуникация и прагматика. М., 2007.
  6. Формановская Н.И. Речевой этикет и культура общения. М., 1989.
  7. Brown P. Gender, politeness, and confrontation in Tenejapa // Discourse Processes. 1990. Vol. 13 (1).
  8. Brown P., Levinson S. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, 1987.
  9. Fraser B. Perspective on Politeness // Journal of Pragmatics. 1990. 14 (2).
  10. Fraser B., Nolen W. The assosiation of deference with linguistic form // International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 1981. № 27.
  11. Goffman E. On Face-Work: an Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction // Communication in Face-to-Face Interaction. Harmondsworth, 1972.
  12. Grice H. Logic and Conversation // Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. N.Y., 1975.
  13. Huang H., Tian G. A sociolinguistic view of linguistic taboo in Chinese // International Journal of the Sociology of Language. 1990. № 81.
  14. Hymes D. Models of the interaction of language and social life // Directions in sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. N.Y., 1986.
  15. Lakoff R.T. Conversational Implicature // Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, 1995.
  16. Lakoff R.T. Language in Context // Language. 1972. № 48.
  17. Leech G. Principles of Pragmatics. L., N.Y., 1983.
  18. Thomas J. Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. L., 1995.
  19. Yokoyama O.T. Disbelief, lies, and manipulations in a Transactional Discourse Model // Argumentation. 1988. № 2.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 0

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies