Syntactic Opposition for Nouns and Verbs as an Argument of a Clause in Late Classical Chinese Text Lunheng I A. D.

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

This article analyzes the syntactic features of presumably nominal and verbal lexemes in argument positions based on the material of a late classical text of the 1st century AD. “Lunheng”. The main proposed tool for syntactic analysis is a system of distinctive contexts (allow to determine the syntactic position of the lexeme under study). Such acriteriahelped to parse and analyze more than twenty-five thousand clauses. It appeared that there is a great frequency difference in the number of verb and noun lexemes encountered in given argument contexts (69.48% and 87.84%, respectively), there are also other differences in contexts’ frequency, conditions and restrictions of use. Potentially, these results may highlight some restrictions of free syntactic shift, and as a result indirectly indicate rigid flexibility of the system of categories in Old Chinese with a number of limitations.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Durymanova

Russian State University for the Humanities; National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: durymanova.a.d@mail.ru

Lecturer at the Russian State University for the Humanities, Lecturer at the National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Zádrapa, L. Word-Class Flexibility in Classical Chinese. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2011. 256 p.
  2. Sun, L. Flexibility in the Parts-of-Speech System of Classical Chinese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2020. 334 p.
  3. Bisang, W. Precategoriality and Argument Structure in Late Archaic Chinese. Constructional Approaches to Language. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s Publishing company, 2008b, pp. 55–88.
  4. Bisang, W. Precategoriality and Syntax-Based Parts of Speech: The Case of Late Archaic Chinese. Studies in Language. 2008, Vol. 32, pp. 568–589.
  5. Durymanova, A.D. Nouns and Verbsʼ Syntactic Shift: Some Evidences Against Old Chinese Parts-Of-Speech SystemʼS Flexibility (Analysis of Lunheng I A.D). 34th Paris Meeting on East Asian Linguistics. CRLAO, 2021, p. 22.
  6. Kryukov, M.V., Huang Shuin. Drevnekitajskij yazyk [Ancient Chinese]. Moscow: Main editorial office for oriental literature, 1978. 497 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Schuessler, A.A. Dictionary of Early Zhou Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawaii press, 1987. 876 p.
  8. Croft, W. Parts of Speech as Language Universals and as Language-Particular Categories. Approaches to the Typology ot Word Classes. Vogel, Comrie (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2000, pp. 65–102.
  9. Radford, A. Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988, p. 640.
  10. Durymanova, A.D. Protivopostavlenie imen i glagolov v drevnekitajskom pamjatnike Lunheng I v. n.e. [Nouns and Verbs’ Opposition in Lunheng I A.D]. Thesis Synopsis. ... PhD. Russian State Uni. for the Humanities, 2021. 63 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Durymanova A.D. Funkciya argumentnogo distinktivnogo konteksta u 被 bej (na materiale kitajskogo pozdneklassicheskogo teksta “Lunhen”) [Argument Distinctive Context Functioning of 被bei (Based on the Material of the Late Classical Chinese Text – “Lunheng”)]. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya [Bulletin of the NSU. Series: History and Philology]. 2022, No. 21(4), pp. 114–127. (In Russ.)
  12. Big Chinese Dictionary. Sichuan: Sichuan cishuchubanshe, 1993. 2555 p. (In Chin.)
  13. Starostin, S.A. Zametki o drevnekitajskom yazyke [Ancient Chinese Notes]. Znak: Sb. st. po lingvistike, semiotike i poetike pamyati A.N. Zhurinskogo [Sign: Collection of Articles on Linguistics, Semiotics and Poetics in Memory of A.N. Zhurinsky]. Moscow, 1994, pp. 93–125. (In Russ.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Noun lexemes’ frequency in argument DCon

Baixar (82KB)
3. Fig. 2. Verb lexemes’ frequency in argument DCon

Baixar (82KB)
4. Fig. 3. Specific argument DCon frequency in which noun lexemes occur (paragraph № 1)

Baixar (70KB)
5. Fig. 4. Specific argument DCon frequency in which verb lexemes occur

Baixar (57KB)
6. Fig. 5. Argument DCon implication

Baixar (57KB)
7. Fig. 6. Comparative histogram: noun and verbal lexemes occurring in single argument DCons

Baixar (86KB)
8. Fig. 7. Comparative histogram: noun and verbal lexemes occurring in more than two argument DCons

Baixar (95KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024