On modern problems of the mechanism of judges’ responsibility for disciplinary misconduct; law enforcement practice, general approaches. Part 1. Termination of the powers of a judge for a serious offense after the constitutional innovations of 2020 – constitutional or disciplinary responsibility?

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The article criticizes the current situation regulated by law, in which a gross disciplinary misconduct of a judge, entailing the early termination of his judicial powers, is considered as a measure of disciplinary responsibility. The conclusion is substantiated that the early termination of the powers of a judge for gross misconduct should entail a measure of not disciplinary, but constitutional responsibility. The mechanism of constitutional responsibility of a judge is partially provided for by the constitutional innovations of 2020 only for a little over two thousand judges, and the Federation Council can apply it, which is not typical for a legislative body, and which destroys the unity of the status of judges. The rationale for its development should be based on the premise that a judge’s gross misconduct, which deserves early termination of his powers, is primarily a violation of the judge’s oath, which currently does not provide for any consequences under current legislation and corporate regulation. Appropriate proposals are made with the necessary justifications.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Mikhail Kleandrov

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mklean@bk.ru

Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Law, Professor, Chief Researcher

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Avakyan S. A. Sanctions in Soviet State Law // Soviet State and Law. 1973. No. 11. Pp. 30, 31 (in Russ.).
  2. Avdeenkova M. P. Constitutional and legal responsibility in Russia: problems of formation and implementation: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2003 (in Russ.).
  3. Aliev T. T. Constitutional responsibility as a special type of legal responsibility // Modern law. 2010. No. 11. P. 33 (in Russ.).
  4. Barsukov V. Themis strengthens the fight against corruption. The Higher Qualification Board of Judges continues to update the judicial system // Nezavisimaya gas. 2023. 20 Nov. (in Russ.).
  5. Bobrova N. A., Zrazhevskaya T. D. Responsibility in the system of guarantees of constitutional norms. Voronezh, 1985. Pp. 57, 58, 69, 70 (in Russ.).
  6. The Great Legal Encyclopedia. M., 2005. P. 567 (in Russ.).
  7. Bulletin of the Higher Qualification Board of Judges of the Russian Federation. 2021. No. 5 (79). P. 23 (in Russ.).
  8. Vinogradov V. A. Constitutional responsibility: issues of theory and legal regulation. M., 2000. Pp. 78–99 (in Russ.).
  9. Vitruk N. V. General theory of legal responsibility. 2nd ed., rev. and add. M., 2009.
  10. State and Law. 2000. No. 3. P. 27 (in Russ.).
  11. Goshulyak V. V. Theoretical and legal problems of constitutional and legal responsibility // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2009. No. 24 (in Russ.).
  12. Dobrynin N. M. On the issue of constitutional responsibili-ty // State and Law. 2010. No. 10. Pp. 17–25 (in Russ.).
  13. Zrazhevskaya T. D. Responsibility as a means of strengthening legality in state-legal relations // Legal guarantees and the regime of socialist legality in the USSR. Yaroslavl, 1977. P. 55 (in Russ.).
  14. Zrazhevskaya T. D. Responsibility under Soviet State Law. Voronezh, 1980. Pp. 91–114 (in Russ.).
  15. Kleandrov M. I. The mechanism of ethical responsibility of a judge: problems of formation. M., 2017 (in Russ.).
  16. Kleandrov M. I. On the Council of Judicial power of the Russian Federation. M., 2016 (in Russ.).
  17. Kleandrov M. I. Responsibility of a judge. M., 2011. Pp. 69– 233 (in Russ.).
  18. Kleandrov M. I. Status of a judge: legal and related components. M., 2008 (in Russ.).
  19. Kolesnikov A. The Constitution is a fixable matter. This was told by Valery Zorkin and Vladimir Putin // Kommersant. 2023. 13 Dec. (in Russ.).
  20. Kolosova N. M. Constitutional responsibility in the Russian Federation: Responsibility of state authorities and other subjects of law for violation of the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation. M., 2000 (in Russ.).
  21. Kolyushin E. I. Constitutional (State) Law of Russia. M., 1999. Pp. 23–26 (in Russ.).
  22. Kondrashev A. A. Constitutional and legal responsibility in the Russian Federation: theory and practice. M., 2006 (in Russ.).
  23. Kondrashov A. A. Measures of constitutional and legal responsibility in modern Constitutional Law: grounds for classification and types of sanctions // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2010. No. 7. Pp. 48–50 (in Russ.).
  24. Constitutional and legal responsibility: problems of Russia, experience of foreign countries / ed. by S. A. Avakyan. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
  25. Kornya A. Ethics of judicial life. The servants of Themis will receive recommendations on proper behavior on the Internet // Kommersant. 2023. 6 Dec. (in Russ.).
  26. Kutafin O. E. The subject of Constitutional Law. M., 2001. P. 396 (in Russ.).
  27. Kutafin O. E., Lebedev V. M., Semigin G. Yu. Judicial power in Russia. History, documents: in 6 vols. M., 2003. Vol. III. P. 469; vol. VI. The Russian Federation / res. ed. L. B. Alekseeva. P. 36 (in Russ.).
  28. Lipinsky D. A. The regulatory function of constitutional responsibility // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2003. No. 4. P. 27 (in Russ.).
  29. Luchin V. O. Constitutional torts // State and Law. 2000. No. 1. Pp. 12–19 (in Russ.).
  30. Luchin V. O. Constitution of the Russian Federation. Problems of implementation. M., 2002. Pp. 278, 279, 283, 359, 360 (in Russ.).
  31. Luchin V. O., Zabrovskaya L. V. The legal nature of constitutional torts // Law and civil society in modern Russia: collection of scientific articles. M., 2003. P. 297 (in Russ.).
  32. Matrosov S. N. Theoretical and legal foundations of constitutional responsibility: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2002. P. 48 (in Russ.).
  33. Nikiforova N. V. Constitutional and legal responsibility in the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: problems of implementation and development: dis. … PhD in Law. Tyumen, 2009 (in Russ.).
  34. The report of the Chairman of the Higher Qualification Board of Judges of the Russian Federation N. V. Timoshin to the X All-Russian Congress of Judges dated November 29, 2022 // Bulletin of the Higher Qualification Board of Judges of the Russian Federation. 2023. No. 1 (87). P. 29 (in Russ.).
  35. Piskotin M. I. Political responsibility of employees of the public administration apparatus in socialist countries // Report at the International Scientific Conference on the topic “Responsibility of an employee of public administration”. Warsaw, 1975 (in Russ.).
  36. Sapunova M. O. The legal responsibility of judges in the Russian Federation: theoretical and legal analysis: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2000. Pp. 79, 84 (in Russ.).
  37. Sergeev A. L. Constitutional responsibility of federal state authorities of the Russian Federation: dis. … PhD in Law. M., 2006. P. 29 (in Russ.).
  38. Serkov P. P. Constitutional responsibility in the Russian Federation: modern theory and practice. M., 2014 (in Russ.).
  39. Scifsky F. S. Responsibility for constitutional offenses: abstract … PhD in Law. Tyumen, 1998. P. 4 (in Russ.).
  40. Trofimova G. A. Constitutional and legal responsibility of federal courts // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2011. No. 11 (in Russ.).
  41. Trofimova G. A. The concept of constitutional and legal responsibility as a branch type of legal responsibility // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2016. No. 7. Pp. 3–8 (in Russ.).
  42. Yakovlev V. F. The status of a judge is the status of power // State and Law. 2004. No. 11. P. 5 (in Russ.).
  43. Yaroshenko N. I. The foundations of constitutional and legal responsibility in the field of norm control // Journal of Russ. 2014. No. 1. P. 102 (in Russ.).

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1

下载 (1024KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024