The third integrative wave in sociology. Part i: the relevance of a new agenda

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is analyzing fragmentation and integration waves in sociology development. The first integrative wave was in the 1920s – 1950s. It appeared in grand theories by P. Sorokin, T. Parsons, the Frankfurt school uniting heterogeneous ideas from classics in models of society as system. After the paradigm crisis of the 1960s-70s and following spread of postmodernist discourse, the second integrative wave arose in form of theories overcoming gaps between concepts of determinist structures and constructivist agency (J. Habermas, A. Giddens, P. Bourdieu) as well as in form of metatheorizing (G. Ritzer, P. Sztompka, J. Alexander). Today’s fragmentation of sociology under conditions of metaparadigm crisis and post-globalization is provoked by the rising postcolonial discourse, by attempts to stigmatize western classics and to create theoretical alternatives to the ‘global North’ domination in knowledge production as well as by conceptions opposing social reality of networks and flows to classical sociality of structures and agency. The third integrative wave is expected to come in the 2020s displacing tendencies of disintegration, discrimination, growing gaps and rising barriers. New theories are relevant as they create a coherent configuration of four types of structures: institutions, interactions, networks, and flows. Concepts of augmented social reality, augmented Modernity, and augmented data are proposed to be solutions for theoretical and methodological integration in sociology.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dmitry V. Ivanov

St. Petersburg State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dvi2001@rambler.ru

Dr. Sci. (Sociol.), Prof.

Russian Federation, St. Petersburg

References

  1. Akiwowo A. (1999) Indigenous Sociologies: Extending the Scope of the Argument. International Socio-logy. No. 2: 115–138.
  2. Alatas S. (2006) Alternative Discourses in Asian Social Science: Responses to Eurocentrism. New Delhi: Sage.
  3. Albrow M., King E. (1990) Globalization, knowledge and society. London: Sage.
  4. Alexander J. (1982) Theoretical Logic in Sociology. London: Routledge.
  5. Appadurai A. (1990) Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization, and Modernity. London: Sage.
  6. Appadurai A. (1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis.
  7. Baehr W. P. (2020) Sociology Arrested. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–15. (In Russ.)
  8. Baudrillard J. (1978) À l’ombre des majorités silencieuses ou la fin du social. Paris: Les Cahiers d‘Utopie.
  9. Beck U. (1997) Was ist Globalisierung? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  10. Castells M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  11. Connell R. (2007) Southern Theory. The Global Dynamics of Knowledge in Social Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  12. Delanty G., Mascareno A. (2023) Social theory: Legacies and future directions – An interview with Gerard Delanty. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 26(3): 408–423.
  13. Dobrenkov V. I. (2009) Value Orientations of Modern Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 8: 108–115. (In Russ.)
  14. Dudina V. I. (2013) Fictitious Crisis of Sociology and a New Shape of Epistemology. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 10: 13–21. (In Russ.)
  15. Dugin A. G. (2022) Eurasianism as a Non-Western Episteme for Russian Humanities. Vestnik RUDN. Ser. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya [Bulletin of RUDN University. International Relations]. Vol. 22(1): 142– 152. (In Russ.)
  16. Filippov A. F. (1997) About the Conception of Theoretical Sociology [O poniatii tereticheskoy sotsiologii]. Sociological Journal [Sotsiologitcheskiy zhurnal]. No. 1/2: 5–37. (In Russ.)
  17. Giddens A. (1990) The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  18. Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge.
  19. Gouldner A. (2003) The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology. St. Petersburg: Nauka. (In Russ.)
  20. House J. S. (2019) Culminating Crisis in American Sociology and its Role in Social Sciences and Public Policy: An Autobiographical, Mulitmethod, Reflexive Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol. 45. No. 1: 1–19.
  21. Ivanov D. V. (2020) Augmented Modernity: Effects of Post-globalization and Post-virtualization. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 5: 44–55. doi: 10.31857/S013216250009397-9. (In Russ.)
  22. Ivanov D. V. (2022) Grumbling ‘Oldies’, Whining ‘Youngsters’, and Progress of Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 2: 3–11. doi: 10.31857/S013216250018033-9. (In Russ.)
  23. Knorr Cetina K. (1997) Sociality with objects: social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, culture & society. Vol. 14(4): 1–30.
  24. Knorr Cetina K. (2009) The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 32. Issue 1: 61–87.
  25. Kravchenko S. A. (2002) Game-zation of Society (Toward Substantiating a New Sociological Paradigm) [Geimizatsia obschestva (k obosnovaniu novoy sotsiologicheskoy paradigmi]. Obschestvennie nauki i sovremennost [Social Sciences and Modernity]. No. 6: 48–53. (In Russ.)
  26. Latour B. (1996) On Interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity. Vol. 3. No 4: 228–245.
  27. Latour B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Lyotard J.-F. (1979) La condition postmoderne. Paris: Minuit.
  29. McLennan G. (2003) Sociology, Eurocentrism and Postcolonial Theory. European Journal of Social Theory. No. 1: 69–86.
  30. Ritzer G. (1975) Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. The American Sociologist. Vol. 10. No. 3: 156–167.
  31. Ritzer G. (1990) Metatheorizing in Sociology. Sociological Forum. Vol. 5. No 1: 3–15.
  32. Ritzer G. (2004) The Globalization of Nothing. London: Sage.
  33. Robertson R. (1992) Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London: SAGE Publications.
  34. Sztompka P. (1979) Sociological Dilemmas: Toward a Dialectic Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  35. Toshchenko Z. T. (2011) Kentavr-problema (Opyt filosofskogo i sotsiologicheskogo analiza [Centaur-problem (А philosophical and sociological analysis)]. Moscow: Novyi khronograph. (In Russ.)
  36. Urry J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
  37. Vandenberghe F., Fuchs S. (2019) On the Coming End of Sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology. Vol. 56. No. 1: 138–143.
  38. Wallerstein I. (1997) Eurocentrism and its avatars: the dilemmas of social science. New Left Review. Vol. 226: 93–108.
  39. Wallerstein I. (2000) Globalization or the Age of Transition? A Long-Term View of the Trajectory of the World System. International Sociology. Vol. 15 (2): 251–267.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences